Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Whole-body three-dimensional photonic scanning: a new technique for obesity research and clinical practice

Abstract

Information on body shape has long been used in categorizing and monitoring obesity. Alongside abdominal circumferences, recent studies further emphasize the value of indices such as sagittal diameter adjusted for thigh girth in categorizing cardiovascular risk. Whole-body three-dimensional photonic scanning has rapidly emerged as a new technology for digital anthropometric measurement. Photonic scanners capture sophisticated raw data on body surface topography in a few seconds, from which extensive body shape information can be extracted using computer algorithms. Photonic scanning now has the potential to play a key role in (1) categorizing obesity (including childhood screening), (2) ranking abdominal size and shape in large-scale epidemiological studies, (3) monitoring individual patients to evaluate treatment efficacy and (4) estimating surface area for drug dosage calculations. New statistical modeling techniques offer the opportunity to develop novel parameters of body shape for linking with biological health outcomes. The low cost, accuracy, ease of use and high acceptability of the technique make it highly suitable for both research and clinical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garrow JS, Webster J . Quetelet's index (W/H2) as a measure of fatness. Int J Obes 1985; 9: 147–153.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH . Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000; 320: 1240–1243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wells JCK . A Hattori chart analysis of body mass index in infants and children. Int J Obes 2000; 24: 325–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Price GM, Uauy R, Breeze E, Bulpitt CJ, Fletcher AE . Weight, shape, and mortality risk in older persons: elevated waist-hip ratio, not high body mass index, is associated with a greater risk of death. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 84: 449–460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox BD, Whichelow MJ, Prevost AT . The development of cardiovascular disease in relation to anthropometric indices and hypertension in British adults. Int J Obes 1998; 22: 966–973.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCarthy HD . Body fat measurements in children as predictors for the metabolic syndrome: focus on waist circumference. Proc Nutr Soc 2006; 65: 385–392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Bautista L, Franzosi MG, Commerford P, INTERHEART Study Investigators et al. Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27 000 participants from 52 countries: a case–control study. Lancet 2005; 366: 1640–1649.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kissebah AH, Vydelingum N, Murray R, Evans DJ, Hartz AJ, Kalkhoff RK et al. Relation of body fat distribution to metabolic complications of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1982; 54: 254–260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Larsson B, Svardsudd K, Welin L, Wilhelmsen L, Bjorntorp P, Tibblin G . Abdominal adipose tissue distribution, obesity, and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: 13 year follow-up of participants in the study of men born in 1913. BMJ 1984; 288: 1401–1404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ducimetiere P, Richard J, Cambien F . The pattern of subcutaneous fat distribution in middle-aged men and the risk of coronary heart disease: the Paris prospective study. Int J Obes 1986; 10: 229–240.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brambilla P, Bedogni G, Moreno LA, Goran MI, Gutin B, Fox KR et al. Cross-validation of anthropometry against magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in children. Int J Obes 2006; 30: 23–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clasey JL, Bouchard C, Teates CD, Riblett JE, Thorner MO, Hartman ML et al. The use of anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures to estimate total abdominal and abdominal visceral fat in men and women. Obes Res 1999; 7: 256–264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Han TS, McNeill G, Seidell JC, Lean ME . Predicting intra-abdominal fatness from anthropometric measures: the influence of stature. Int J Obes 1997; 21: 587–593.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McCarthy HD, Ashwell M . A study of central fatness using waist-to-height ratios in UK children and adolescents over two decades supports the simple message—‘keep your waist circumference to less than half your height’. Int J Obes 2006; 30: 988–992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Deurenberg-Yap M, Chew SK, Deurenberg P . Elevated body fat percentage and cardiovascular risks at low body mass index levels among Singaporean Chinese, Malays and Indians. Obes Rev 2002; 3: 209–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang J, Thornton JC, Russell M, Burastero S, Heymsfield S, Pierson Jr RN . Asians have lower body mass index (BMI) but higher percent body fat than do whites: comparisons of anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 60: 23–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pan WH, Flegal KM, Chang HY, Yeh WT, Yeh CJ, Lee WC . Body mass index and obesity-related metabolic disorders in Taiwanese and US whites and blacks: implications for definitions of overweight and obesity for Asians. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 79: 31–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu S, Heymsfield SB, Toyoshima H, Wang Z, Pietrobelli A, Heshka S . Race-ethnicity-specific waist circumference cutoffs for identifying cardiovascular disease risk factors. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 81: 409–415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kahn HS, Austin H, Williamson DF, Arensberg D . Simple anthropometric indices associated with ischemic heart disease. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1017–1024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Snijder MB, Visser M, Dekker JM, Goodpaster BH, Harris TB, Kritchevsky SB, Health ABC Study et al. Low subcutaneous thigh fat is a risk factor for unfavourable glucose and lipid levels, independently of high abdominal fat. The Health ABC Study. Diabetologia 2005; 48: 301–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Snijder MB, Dekker JM, Visser M, Bouter LM, Stehouwer CD, Kostense PJ et al. Associations of hip and thigh circumferences independent of waist circumference with the incidence of type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77: 1192–1197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zamboni M, Turcato E, Armellini F, Kahn HS, Zivelonghi A, Santana H et al. Sagittal abdominal diameter as a practical predictor of visceral fat. Int J Obes 1998; 22: 655–660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. van der Kooy K, Leenen R, Seidell JC, Deurenberg P, Visser M . Abdominal diameters as indicators of visceral fat: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometry. Br J Nutr 1993; 70: 47–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohrvall M, Berglund L, Vessby B . Sagittal abdominal diameter compared with other anthropometric measurements in relation to cardiovascular risk. Int J Obes 2000; 24: 497–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Empana JP, Ducimetiere P, Charles MA, Jouven X . Sagittal abdominal diameter and risk of sudden death in asymptomatic middle-aged men: the Paris Prospective Study I. Circulation 2004; 110: 2781–2785.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Riserus U, Arnlov J, Brismar K, Zethelius B, Berglund L, Vessby B . Sagittal abdominal diameter is a strong anthropometric marker of insulin resistance and hyperproinsulinemia in obese men. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2041–2046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Turcato E, Bosello O, Di Francesco V, Harris TB, Zoico E, Bissoli L et al. Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter as surrogates of body fat distribution in the elderly: their relation with cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Obes 2000; 24: 1005–1010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Horiguchi C . BL (body line) scanner—the development of a new 3-D measurement and reconstruction system. Int Arch Photogram Remote Sens 1998; 32: 421–429.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen CS, Hung YP, Chiang CC, Wu JL . Range data acquisition using color structured lighting and stereo vision. Image Vision Comp 1997; 15: 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Allen B, Curless B, Popovic Z . The space of human body shapes: reconstruction and parameterization from range scans. ACM Trans Graphics 2003; 22: 587–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ruto A, Lee M, Buxton B . Comparing principal and independent modes of variation in 3-D human torso shape using PCA and ICA. In: Proceedings of ICA Research Network International Workshop. University of Liverpool, 2006, pp 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wells JCK, Douros I, Fuller NJ, Elia M, Dekker L . Assessment of body volume using a near infra-red 3-D photographic scanner. Ann NY Acad Sci 2000; 904: 247–254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang J, Gallagher D, Thornton JC, Yu W, Horlick M, Pi-Sunyer FX . Validation of a 3-dimensional photonic scanner for the measurement of body volumes, dimensions, and percentage body fat. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 83: 809–816.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wells JCK, Treleaven P, Cole TJ . BMI compared with 3-D body shape: The UK national sizing survey. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 85: 419–425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wells JCK, Cole TJ, Bruner D, Treleaven PC . Body shape in American and British adults: between-country and inter-ethnic comparisons. Int J Obes 2007; July 31 [e-pub ahead of print].

  36. Treleaven PC . Sizing us up. IEEE Spectrum 2004; 41: 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jones PRM, Rioux M . Three-dimensional surface anthropometry: applications to the human body. Opt Lasers Engin 1997; 28: 89–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Treleaven P, Wells JCK . 3D body scanning & healthcare applications. IEEE Comp 2007; 40: 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gower JC . Generalised Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 1975; 40: 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Seo H, Magnenat-Thalmann N . An automatic modeling of human bodies from sizing parameters. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Symposium on Interactive 3-D Graphics. ACM Press: New York, 2003, pp 19–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH . Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third national health and nutrition examination survey. JAMA 2002; 287: 356–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin JD, Chiou WK, Weng HF, Tsai YH, Liu TH . Comparison of three-dimensional anthropometric body surface scanning to waist-hip ratio and body mass index in correlation with metabolic risk factors. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 757–766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. British National Formulary. British Medical Association/Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 39th edn. London, 2000.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J C K Wells.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wells, J., Ruto, A. & Treleaven, P. Whole-body three-dimensional photonic scanning: a new technique for obesity research and clinical practice. Int J Obes 32, 232–238 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803727

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803727

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links