Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Impact of overweight and obesity on health-related quality of life—a Swedish population study

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of overweight and obesity on health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) in the general population in western Sweden.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.

SUBJECTS: A total of 5633 men and women aged 16–64 y born in Sweden.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scale and summary component scores of the SF-36 Health Survey.

RESULTS: Obese men aged 16–34 y rated their HRQL lower than normal-weight men did on all four physical health scales of the SF-36 and on two of the four mental health scales. Obese women in the same age group rated their health worse than normal-weight women on three of the physical health scales. Thus, in younger men and women the analysis indicated a clearer negative association between obesity and physical health than between obesity and mental health. Obese women aged 35–64 y rated their health worse on all scales than normal-weight women did, while obese men in this age group rated their health worse on only two SF-36 subscales—physical functioning and general health perception. The massively obese men and women suffered from a poor level of HRQL.

CONCLUSION: Not only does the level of obesity affect HRQL, the impact of overweight and obesity also differs by age and sex. The importance of aspects of both physical and mental health should be fully recognised.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Taft C . How to assess quality of life in medicine: rationale and methods. In: Guy-Grand B, Ailhaud G (eds) Progress in obesity research: 8 Libbey: London 1999 749–755.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ware JE . Standards for validating health measures: definition and content J Chron Dis 1987 40: 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Sjöström L, Backman L, Bengtsson C, Bouchard C, Dahlgren S, Jonsson E, Larsson B, Lindstedt S, Näslund I, Olbe L, Wedel H . Swedish obese subjects (SOS)—an intervention study of obesity. Baseline evaluation of health and psychosocial functioning in the first 1743 subjects examined Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1993 17: 503–512.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karlsson J, Sjöström L, Sullivan M . Swedish obese subjects (SOS)—an intervention study of obesity. Two-year follow-up of health-related quality of life (HRQL) and eating behavior after gastric surgery for severe obesity Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998 22: 113–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wadden TA, Stunkard AJ . Psychosocial consequences of obesity and dieting. In: Stunkard AJ, Wadden TA (eds) Obesity: theory and therapy Raven Press: New York 1993 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fontaine KR, Cheskin L, Barofsky I . Health-related quality of life in obese persons seeking treatment J Fam Pract 1996 43: 265–270.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kolotkin RL, Head S, Hamilton M, Tse CJ . Assessing impact of weight on quality of life Obes Res 1995 3: 49–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fitzgibbon ML, Stolley MR, Kirschenbaum DS . Obese people who seek treatment have different characteristics than those who do not seek treatment Hlth Psychol 1993 12: 342–345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown WJ, Dobson AJ, Mishra G . What is a healthy weight for middle aged women? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998 22: 520–528.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Le Pen C, Levy E, Loos F, Banzet MN, Basdevant A . ‘Specific’ scale compared with ‘generic’ scale: a double measurement of the quality of life in a French community sample of obese subjects J Epidemiol Community Health 1998 52: 445–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Han TS, Tijhuis MAR, Lean MEJ, Seidell JC . Quality of life in relation to overweight and body fat distribution Am J Public Hlth 1998 88: 1814–1820.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Doll HA, Petersen SEK, Stewart-Brown SL . Obesity and physical and emotional well-being: associations between body mass index, chronic illness, and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 questionnaire Obes Res 2000 8: 160–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware J . SF-36 Hälsoenkät, manual och tolkningsguide Sektionen för vårdforskning, Medicinska fakulteten, Sahlgrenska Sjukhuset: Göteborg 1994.

  14. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B . SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide New England Medical Center, The Health Institute: Boston, MA 1993.

  15. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware J . The Swedish SF-36 health survey—I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden Soc Sci Med 1995 41: 1349–1358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Persson L-O, Karlsson J, Bengtsson C, Steen B, Sullivan M . The Swedish SF-36 health survey II. Evaluation of clinical validity: results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenburg J Clin Epidemiol 1998 51: 1095–1103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sullivan M, Karlsson J . The Swedish SF-36 health survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population J Clin Epidemiol 1998 51: 1105–1113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. WHO Expert Committee . Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry, WHO Technical Report Series no. 854 WHO: Geneva 1995.

  19. Särndal C-E, Swensson B, Wretman J . Model assisted survey sampling Springer: New York 1992.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL . Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods Duxbury Press: Boston, MA 1978.

  21. Rothman KJ, Greenland S . Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn Lippincott-Raven: New York 1998.

  22. Seidel JC, Flegal KM . Assessing obesity: classification and epidemiology Br Med Bull 1997 53: 238–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman MA, Brownell KD . Psychological correlates of obesity: moving to the next research generation Psychol Bull 1995 1: 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mannucci E, Ricca V, Bariculli E, Di Bernardo M, Travaglini R, Cabras PL, Rotella CM . Quality of life and overweight: the obesity related well-being (Orwell 97) questionnaire Addict Behav 1999 3: 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wadden TA, Foster GD, Stunkard AJ, Linowitz JR . Dissatisfaction with weight and figure in obese girls: discontent but not depression Int J Obes 1989 13: 89–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L . Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age Br Med J 1993 306: 1437–1440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Laforge RG, Rossi JS, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Levesque DA, McHorney CA . Stage of regular exercise and health-related quality of life Prev Med 1999 28: 349–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Taft C, Karlsson J, Sullivan M . Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores? Quality Life Res 2001 10: 395–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahlmén EM, Bengtsson CB, Sullivan BM, Bjelle A . A comparison of overall health between patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a population with and without rheumatoid arthritis Scand J Rheumatol 1990 19: 413–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Seidell JC . Time trends in obesity: an epidemiological perspective Horm Metab Res 1997 29: 155–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnsson CL . Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960–1994 Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998 22: 39–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stewart AW, Jackson RT, Ford MA, Beaglehole R . Underestimation of relative weight by use of self-reported height and weight Am J Epidemiol 1987 125: 122–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kuskowska-Wolk A, Karlsson P, Stolt M, Rössner S . The predictive validity of body mass index based on self-reported weight and height Int J Obes 1989 13: 441–453.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Roberts RJ . Can self-reported data accurately describe the prevalence of overweight? Public Hlth 1995 109: 275–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pi-Sunyer FX . Medical hazards of obesity Ann Intern Med 1993 119: 655–660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to the county council of Västra Götalandsregionen for permission to use the data. We gratefully acknowledge helpful comments on the manuscript from Charles Taft. We also extend our thanks to Helen A Doll, IJO referee of this paper, for challenging and constructive criticism. This article was made possible by support from the Medical Faculty, Göteborg University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Sullivan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larsson, U., Karlsson, J. & Sullivan, M. Impact of overweight and obesity on health-related quality of life—a Swedish population study. Int J Obes 26, 417–424 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801919

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801919

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links