Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Quality of food eaten in English primary schools: school dinners vs packed lunches

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 61, pages 856–864 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the food and nutrient intakes of primary school children eating school dinners and packed lunches.

Subjects:

Six-hundred and twenty-one 7-year-old children participating in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children in South West England.

Methods:

Diet was assessed by 3-day unweighed food record.

Results:

The composition of both types of school meals compared unfavourably with dietary guidelines. Intakes of energy, non-starch polysaccharides (NSP), calcium, iron, folate, retinol equivalents, zinc, copper, magnesium, iodine and riboflavin were too low, and intakes of total and saturated fat were too high. However, children who ate school dinners had higher lunchtime intakes of protein, starch, NSP and most vitamins and minerals and lower intakes of sugar (14.2 and 20.9% of energy in school dinners and packed lunches, respectively, P<0.001) and saturated fat (12.0 and 16.2%, P<0.001). Only around half of the recommended amount of fruit and vegetables was eaten by children having either type of school meal. There were also differences in the whole day's nutrient intake according to school meal type. Children eating packed lunches had lower daily intakes of potassium and zinc, and higher intakes of sugar and saturated fat. Differences in nutrient intake were independent of maternal education.

Conclusions:

The food and nutrient content of both school dinners and packed lunches needed improvement. However, the standard of food brought from home by children was, if anything, worse than that served at school. Recent moves to improve school dinners will need to be complemented by education about what constitutes a healthy packed lunch.

Sponsorship:

University of Bristol.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen GE, Lifschitz C, Friis-Hansen B (1979). Dietary habits and serum lipids during the first 4 years of life. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 68, 165–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham SA, Gill C, Welch A, Day K, Cassidy A, Khaw KT et al. (1994). Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. Br J Nutr 72, 619–643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron N (1986). In: Falkner F, Tanner JM (eds). Human Growth: A Comprehensive Treatise, Vol. 3. Plenum Press: New York and London, pp 3–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho H, Nadow M (2004). Understanding barriers to implementing quality lunch and nutrition education. J Commun Health 29, 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley H (2005). Nutrient-based standards for school food. The Caroline Walker Trust and National Heart Forum: Abbots Langley, Hertfordshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2001). National Food Survey 2000. The Stationery Office: London http://statistics.defra.gov.uk/esg/publications/nfs/2000/default.asp.

  • Department of Education and Employment (2001). The Education Nutritional Standards for School Lunches (England) Regulations 2000. The Stationery Office, London.

  • Department of Health (1991). Report on Health and Social Subjects, No 41, Dietary Reference Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the UK. Report of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy HMSO: London.

  • De Swiet M, Fayers P, Shinebourne EA (1980). Value of repeated blood pressure measurements: the Brompton Study. BMJ i, 1567–1569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geleijnse JM, Grobbee D, Hofman A (1990). Sodium and potassium intake and blood pressure change in childhood. BMJ 300, 899–902.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn L, Emmett P, Rogers I, ALSPAC Study Team (2005). Food and nutrient intakes of a population sample of 7-year-old children in the south-west of England in 1999/2000 – what difference does gender make? J Hum Nutr Diet 18, 7–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golding J, Pembrey M, Jones R, the ALSPAC Study Team (2001). The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children I. Study methodology. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 15, 74–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory J, Lowe S (2000). National Diet and Nutrition Survey: young people aged 4 to 18 years, Volume 1: Report of the diet and nutrition survey The Stationery Office: London.

  • Jefferson A, Cowbrough K (2004). School Lunch Box Survey 2004. Community Nutrition Group and Food Standards Agency: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensink RP, Katan MB (1990). Effect of dietary trans fatty acids on high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in healthy subjects. N Engl J Med 323, 439–445.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson M, Bradbury J, Poulter J, McGee A, Msebele S, Jarvis L (2004). School Meals in Secondary Schools in England. King's College: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • North K, Emmett P, the ALSPAC Study Team (2000). Multivariate analysis of diet among three-year-old children and associations with socio-demographic characteristics. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 73–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Price GM, Paul AA, Key FB, Harter AC, Cole TJ, Day KC . et al. (1995). Measurement of diet in a large national survey: comparison of computerised and manual coding of records in household measures. J Hum Nutr Diet 8, 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers I, Emmett P, ALSPAC Study Team (2003). The effect of maternal smoking status, educational levels and age on food and nutrient intakes in preschool children. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 854–864.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton C, Kirk T, Belton NR (1996). The contribution of specific dietary patterns to energy and nutrient intakes in 7-8-year-old Scottish schoolchildren. II. Weekday lunches. J Hum Nutr Diet 9, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Bayle M, Munoz-Fernandez MT, Gonzalez-Requejo A (1999). A longitudinal study of blood pressure in Spanish schoolchildren. Arch Dis Childhood 81, 169–171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (2003). Salt and Health. The Stationery Office: London.

  • Whincup PH, Owen CG, Sattar N, Cook DG (2005). School dinners and markers of cardio vascular health and type 2 diabetes in 13–16 year olds: cross sectional study. BMJ 331, 1060–1061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help in recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists and nurses. The UK Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the authors who also serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Medicine, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    I S Rogers, A R Ness, K Hebditch, L R Jones & P M Emmett

Authors
  1. I S Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A R Ness
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K Hebditch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L R Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P M Emmett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P M Emmett.

Additional information

Guarantor: IS Rogers.

Contributor: All authors contributed to the design of the study and the interpretation of the data. PME, ISR and LRJ initiated and supervised the collection and preparation of the data. ISR and KH analysed the data. All authors contributed to the drafting and revision of the article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, I., Ness, A., Hebditch, K. et al. Quality of food eaten in English primary schools: school dinners vs packed lunches. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 856–864 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602592

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602592

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links