Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Dietary intakes of adults in the Netherlands by childhood and adulthood socioeconomic position

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether there are socioeconomic differences in the intakes of total fat, fatty acids and fruit among adults in the Netherlands using childhood (parental) and participant's own socioeconomic position (SEP). Furthermore, to quantify the independent effects of childhood and adulthood SEP on dietary behavior in adulthood.

Design: Cross-sectional study among participants in the GLOBE study.

Subjects: A total of 2512 men and women, aged 25–78 y, living in a region in the southeast Netherlands.

Methods: Dietary intakes were collected by an interviewer-administered quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Average daily intakes of total energy, total, saturated, monounsaturated, polyunsaturated fat and fruit were calculated. The highest educational level was used to classify the participant's adulthood SEP. Parental indicators (mother's education and father's occupation when participants were 12 y of age) were used to classify childhood SEP.

Results: Males with lower levels of education had moderately higher energy intakes than their more educated counterparts, but did not differ in their intakes of total fat, fatty acids and fruit. Among females, the least educated groups had marginally higher intakes of total and monounsaturated fat than the most educated group, and were less likely to consume fruit. For most of these significant differences, the participant's own education demonstrated independent effects that were consistent with chronic disease inequalities. A small residual effect of mother's education was also demonstrated for intakes of some nutrients for males and females, and for fruit consumption among females. However, the effect size of mother's education was rather small and not always consistent with disease inequalities.

Conclusions: The results imply that socioeconomic disparities in intakes of some dietary factors may contribute to inequalities in chronic disease. Adulthood SEP potentially has a more direct influence on dietary intake inequalities than childhood SEP.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnett D, McGovern P, Jacobs D, Shahar E, Duval S, Blackburn H & Luepker R (2002): Fifteen-year trends in cardiovascular risk factors (1980–1982 through 1995–1997): the Minnesota Heart Survey. Am. J. Epidemiol. 156, 929–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shlomo Y & Kuh D (2002): A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int. J. Epidemiol. 31, 285–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom E, Hernell O & Persson L (1996): Cardiovascular risk indicators cluster in girls from families of low socio-economic status. Acta. Paediatr. 85, 1083–1090.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berkel van Schaik A & Tax B (1990): Towards a Standard Operationalisation Of Socio-Economic Status For Epidemiological and Sociomedical Research. van Rijswijk: Ministerie WVC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch L (1999): Development of food preferences. Ann. Rev. of Nutr. 19, 41–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blane D, Hart C, Davey Smith G, Gillis C, Hole D & Hawthorn V (1996): Association of cardiovascular disease risk factors with socioeconomic position during childhood and adulthood. Br. Med. J. 313, 1434–1438.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton-Smith C, Smith W, Woodward M & Tunstall-Pedoe H (1991): Nutrient intakes of different social-class groups: results from the Scottish Heart Health Study. Bri. J. Nutr. 65, 321–335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma H, Schrijvers C & Mackenbach J (1999): Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and importance of perceived control: cohort study. Br. Med. J. 319, 1469–1470.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom G, Hallqvist J, Haglund B, Romelsjo A, Svanstrom L & Diderichsen F (1993): Socioeconomic differences in smoking in the urban Swedish population. The bias introduced by non-participation in a mailed questionnaire. Scand. J. Social Med. 21, 77–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Camps M & Abden D (1994): De ENVET-lijst: Ontwikkeling en validering van een korte voedelsfrequentievragenlijst naar energie en vet- tweede fase. Geldrop-Valkenswaard: GGD regio Geldrop-Valkenswaard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie CE, Elton RA, Todd J & Platt S (1997): Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: the WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. Health Educ. Res. 12, 385–397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davey Smith G & Brunner E (1997): Socioeconomic differentials in health: the role of nutrition. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 56, 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey Smith J & Kuh D (2001): Commentary: William Ogilvy Kermack and the childhood origins of adult health and disease. Int. J. Epidemiol. 30, 696–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eachus J, Chan P, Pearson N, Propper C & Davey Smith G (1999): An additional dimension to health inequalities: disease severity and socioeconomic position. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 53, 603–611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson R, Goldthorpe J & Portocarero L (1983): Intergenerational class mobility and convergence thesis: England, France and Sweden. Br. J. Sociol. 34, 303–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein J (1993): The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: a review of the literature. Millbank Quart. 71, 279–322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallacher J, Elwood P, Hopkinson C, Rabbitt P, Stollery B, Sweetnam P, Brayne C & Huppert F (1999): Cognitive function in the Caepherilly study: associations with age, social class, education and mood. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 15, 161–169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galobardes B, Morabia A & Bernstein M (2001): Diet and socioeconomic position: does the use of different indicators matter? Int. J. Epidemiol. 30, 334–340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giskes K, Turrell G, Patterson C & Newman B (2002): Socioeconomic differences among Australian adults in consumption of fruit and vegetables and intakes of vitamins A, C and folate. J. Hum. Nutr. Dietetics 15, 375–385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenlund K, Lui K, Kiefe C, Yunis C, Dyer A & Burke G (1995): Impact of father's education and parental smoking status on smoking behaviour of young adults. Am. J. Epidemiol. 142, 1029–1033.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harnack L, Block G & Lane S (1997): Influence of selected environmental and personal factors on dietary behaviour and chronic disease prevention. J. Nutr. Educ. 29, 306–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulshof K, Lowik M, Kok F, Wedel M, Brants H, Hermus R & ten Hoor F (1991): Diet and other life-style factors in high and low socioeconomic groups (Dutch Nutrition Surveillance System). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 45, 441–450.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James W, Nelson M & Leather S (1997): The contribution of nutrition to inequalities in health. Br. Med. J. 314, 1545–1549.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kant A, Block G, Schatzkin A, Ziegler R & Nestle M (1991): Dietary diversity in the US population, NHANES II, 1976–1980. J. Am. Dietetic Assoc. 91, 1526–1531.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan G, Turrell G, Lynch J, Everson S, Helkala E & Salonen J (2001): Childhood socioeconomic position and cognitive function in adulthood. Int. J. Epidemiol. 30, 256–263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh D, Hardy R, Langenberg C, Richards M & Wadsworth M (2002): Mortality in adults aged 26–54 years related to socioeconomic conditions in childhood and adulthood: post war birth cohort study. Br. Med. J. 325, 1076–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh D & Power C (1999): Social pathways between childhood and adulthood health. In Lifecourse approach to chronic disease epidemiology, ed. Kuh and Ben-Shlomo. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuller L (1997): Dietary fat and chronic diseases: epidemiologic overview. J. Am. Dietetic Assoc. 97, s9–s15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg O (1993): The impact of childhood living conditions on illness and mortality in adulthood. Social Sci. and Med. 36, 1047–1052.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenbach J, van de Mheen H & Stronks K (1994): A prospective cohort study investigating the explanation of socio-economic inequalities in health in the Netherlands. Social Sci. Med. 2, 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenbach J, Cavelaars A, Kunst A & Groenhof F (2000): Socioeconomic inequalities in cardiovascular disease mortality; an international study. Eur. Heart J. 21, 1141–1151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mennell S, Murcott A & van Otterloo A (1992): The Sociology of eating, diet and culture. London: Sage Publications.

  • Murphy S, Rose D, Hudes M & Viteri F (1992): Demographic and economic factors associated with dietary quality for adults in the 1987–1988 Nationwide Food Consumption Survey. J. Am. Dietetic Assoc. 92, 1352–1357.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ness A & Powles J (1997): Fruit and vegetables and cardiovascular disease: a review. Int. J. Epidemiol. 26, 1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerleau J, Pederson L, Ostbye T, Speechley M & Speechley K (1997): Health behaviours and socio-economic status in Ontario, Canada. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 13, 613–622.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Popkin B, Siegra-Riz A & Haines P (1996): A comparison of dietary trends among racial and socioeconomic groups in the United States. New Engl. J. Med. 335, 716–720.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schrijvers C, Bosma H & Mackenbach J (2002): Hostility and the educational gradient in health. Eur. J. Public Health 12, 110–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw M, Orford S, Brimblecombe N & Dorling D (2000): Widening inequality in mortality between 160 regions of 15 European countries in the early 1990 s. Social Sci. Med. 50, 1047–1058.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh G & Siahpush M (2002): Increasing inequalities in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among US adults aged 25–64 years by area socioeconomic status, 1969–1998. Int. J. Epidemiol. 31, 600–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A & Baghurst K (1993): Dietary vitamin and mineral intake and social status. Austr. J. Nutri. Dietetics 50, 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Incorporated (2000): Statistical Package for Social Scientists.

  • Stallone D, Brunner E, Bingham S & Marmot M (1997): Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: the influence of reporting bias on apparent socioeconomic variation in nutrient intakes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 51, 815–825.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steele P, Dobson A, Alexander H & Russell A (1991): Who eats what? A comparison of dietary patterns among men and women in different occupational groups. Austr. J. Public Health 15, 286–295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz K & Potter J (1996): Vegetables, fruit and cancer prevention: a review. J. Am. Dietetic Assoc. 96, 1027–1039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stichting Nederlands Voedingsstoffenbestand (1987): NEVO-tabel 1986/1987. Ziest: Nederlands Voedingsstoffenbestand.

  • Thompson R, Margetts B, Speller V & McVey D (1999): The Health Education Authority's Health and Lifestyle Survey 1993: who are the low fruit and vegetable consumers? J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 53, 294–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turrell G & Najman J (1995): Collecting food-related data from low socioeconomic groups: how adequate are our current research designs? Austr. J. Public Health 19, 410–416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turrell G (1996): Structural, material and economic influences on the food purchasing choices of socioeconomic groups. Austr. NZ J. Public Health 20, 611–617.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turrell G & Mathers C (2001): Socioeconomic inequalities in all-cause and specific cause mortality in Australia: 1985–1997. Int. J. Epidemiol. 30, 231–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turrell G, Patterson C, Oldenburg B, Gould T & Roy M (2003): The socioeconomic patterning of survey participation and non-response error in a multi-level study of food purchasing behaviour: area- and individual-level characteristics. Public Health Nutr. 6, 181–190.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Agt H, Stronks K & Mackenbach J (2000): Chronic illness and poverty in the Netherlands. Eur. J. Public Health 10, 197–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Mheen H, Stronks K, Looman C & Mackenbach J (1998): Does childhood socioeconomic status influence adult health through behavioural factors? Int. J. Epidemiol. 27, 431–437.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van de Mheen H, Stronks K, Schrijvers C & Mackenbach J (1999): The influence of adult ill health on occupational class mobility and mobility out of and into employment in the Netherlands. Social Sci. Med. 49, 509–518.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Lenthe F, Droomers M, Schrijvers C & Mackenbach J (2000): Socio-demographic variables and 6 year change in body mass index: longitudinal results from the GLOBE study. Int. J. Obes. 24, 1077–1084.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willett W (1998): Nutritional Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winkleby M, Jatulis D, Frank E & Fortmann S (1992): Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Public Health 82, 816–820.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Giskes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giskes, K., Lenthe, F., Brug, H. et al. Dietary intakes of adults in the Netherlands by childhood and adulthood socioeconomic position. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 871–880 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601889

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601889

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links