Abstract
Objective: To explore the specificity and sensitivity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity as compared with the direct comparison of energy intake with energy expenditure measured by doubly-labelled water.
Design: Twenty-two studies with measurements of total energy expenditure by doubly-labelled water (EE), basal metabolic rate (BMR) and energy intake (EI) provided the database (n=429). The ratio EI:EE provided the baseline definition of under- (UR), acceptable- (AR) and over-reporters (OR), respectively EI:EE <0.76, 0.76–1.24 and >1.24. Four strategies for identifying under- and over-reporters using the Goldberg cut-off were explored. Sensitivity of the cut-off was calculated as the proportion of UR correctly identified and specificity as the proportion of non-UR correctly identified.
Results: UR, AR and OR (by EI:EE) were 34, 62 and 4% respectively of all subjects. When a single Goldberg cut-off for the physical activity level (PAL) of 1.55 was used, for men and women respectively the sensitivity was 0.50 and 0.52 and the specificity 1.00 and 0.99. Using a cut-off for higher PAL traded specificity for sensitivity. Using the cut-off for a PAL of 1.95, sensitivity was 0.76 and 0.85 and the specificity 0.87 and 0.78 for men and women respectively. Using cut-offs for mean age–sex specific PAL did not improve sensitivity. When subjects were assigned to low, medium and high activity levels and cut-offs for three different PALs used, sensitivity improved to 0.74 and 0.67 without loss of specificity (0.97 and 0.98), for men and women respectively. If activity levels for men were applied to the womens’ data, sensitivity improved to 0.72.
Conclusion: To identify diet reports of poor validity using the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR, information is needed on each subject’s activity level.
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2000) 54, 395–404
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Guarantor: Alison E Black.
Reprints will not be available from the author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Black, A. The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 395–404 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600971
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600971
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Flawed research methods result in misleading conclusions
Journal of Human Hypertension (2023)
-
Dietary taste patterns and diet quality of female nurses around the night shift
European Journal of Nutrition (2023)
-
The impact of human and livestock respiration on CO2 emissions from 14 global cities
Carbon Balance and Management (2022)
-
The impact of a 6-week community-based physical activity and health education intervention—a pilot study among Irish farmers
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) (2022)
-
Higher Levels of Physical Activity are Associated with Greater Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Older Adults
The Journal of nutrition, health and aging (2021)