Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 53, Issues 4–5, October–November 2011, Pages 303-308
Preventive Medicine

“If there wasn't the technology then I would probably be out everyday”: A qualitative study of children's strategies to reduce their screen viewing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.08.019Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To explore the views of British 10–11 year old children towards reducing their screen-viewing and their screen-viewing reduction strategies.

Method

10 focus groups were conducted with 55 10–11 year old children (30 girls, 25 boys) in Bristol (UK) in 2010. Data were transcribed and transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Three main themes were developed: Reaction to Reduction; Reduction: What, when and what else instead?; and Strategies to reduce screen-viewing. Participants reacted largely positively to reducing their screen-viewing although enjoyment, established routines and favourite TV programmes presented barriers. A range of screen-viewing modes were put forward as candidates for reduction and participants believed they would replace screen-viewing with both physically active and non-screen sedentary behaviours. Reduction strategies identified comprised the provision of alternative activities, facilities and after school clubs, peer-led educational interventions, behavioural strategies such as the use of rewards, charts and time limits which involved children's parents and parent–child collaboration. Unexpectedly, participants identified the focus group itself as a means of encouraging self-reflection and initiating change.

Conclusion

Children appeared open to screen-viewing reduction and identified the strategies that they may respond to best. This can inform the development of interventions designed to reduce screen-viewing.

Highlights

► We qualitatively explore children's strategies for screen-viewing reduction. ► After school activities out of the home are perceived to be effective. ► Reducing habitual, low-value screen-viewing is endorsed. ► Collaborative strategies with parents and peers are preferred to enforced rules.

Introduction

Screen-viewing (SV) behaviours (i.e., watching television [TV], playing computer/video games, or using a desktop, laptop or handheld computer) are sedentary pastimes central to the lives of children in developed countries (Marshall et al., 2006, Olds et al., 2006). Many children in Europe (Jago et al., 2008) and the United States (Anderson et al., 2008) exceed recommendations of 2 h/day of total screen/entertainment media time (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2001). Some studies have shown positive associations between children's SV and body weight (Gorely et al., 2004), adiposity (Ekelund et al., 2006), metabolic syndrome (Mark and Janssen, 2008), lower psychological well-being (Hamer et al., 2009, Page et al., 2010) and poor adult health (Hancox et al., 2004). It is therefore important to develop strategies to reduce children's SV and one way to do this is to add qualitative data to the existing quantitative data and base interventions on the experiences and preferences of the target group.

Previous research has found that 13–16 year olds suggest strategies for reducing SV such as restricting time, limiting availability and doing alternative physical activities (Hattersley et al., 2009). These strategies echo those reported by New Zealand parents (Dorey et al., 2009). In focus groups with American parents and their 6–13 year olds, Jordan et al. found that children aged 6–7 responded positively to eliminating background TV and removing TV during meals. In contrast, 9–13 year olds and children who had a TV in their bedroom perceived its removal as an unfair punishment (Jordan et al., 2006).

Parental SV rules are negatively associated with SV (Barradas et al., 2008, He et al., 2010, Ramirez et al., 2011) and parent–adolescent agreement on SV rules strengthens this association (Ramirez et al., 2011). It is therefore important for parents and children to work together to reduce child SV.

There is a lack of research of British children's attitudes towards SV reduction and only one study has explored the strategies developed by children themselves (Hattersley et al., 2009). Behaviour change interventions should engage the target population, and children may be more accepting of such interventions than those imposed by authority figures. Previous research has focussed on TV viewing only (Dorey et al., 2009, Jordan et al., 2006), or only briefly considered broader SV (Hattersley et al., 2009). Therefore, the aim of this study was to understand young people's attitudes towards reducing SV and explore their SV reduction strategies.

Section snippets

Recruitment and participants

Focus groups were conducted with 10–11 year old children recruited from five schools in Bristol, UK. Five schools were selected to represent quintiles of deprivation using the school-level Index of Multiple Deprivation, which includes income, employment, education and health data (Noble et al., 2007). 261 Year 6 pupils attended a project information session, were given the opportunity to ask questions and were provided with a parent information sheet and consent forms. The study was approved by

Results

Three themes were developed; Reaction to Reduction captures the children's responses to the idea of reducing SV; Reduction: What, when and what else instead? describes the children's views on what SV mode they could reduce, the time of day they could best do this and suggested alternative activities; Strategies to reduce screen-viewing focuses on child-identified SV reduction strategies and their experiences of previous strategies. These themes are discussed below and quotes are presented in

Discussion

Reducing screen-viewing has implications for children's health beyond reducing their sedentary time, such as exposure to appropriate TV, internet or game content, time spent with others versus alone, exposure to advertising and food consumption during SV (Jordan et al., 2006, Patrick and Nicklas, 2005). Findings from the focus groups revealed that children were largely open to reducing their SV and expected positive emotions, better health and favourable self-evaluation to result. Despite this,

Conclusions

This study indicates that 10–11 year old children believe that they could reduce their SV and that reduction would yield benefits. Findings suggest that child-centred strategies that focus on self-discovery, self-reflection and collaboration with parents may hold promise and require further testing.

Supplementary Material. Semi-structured_focus_group_guide.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by an award from the Faculty of Social Sciences and Law Academic Staff Research Support Scheme at the University of Bristol. This report is also research arising from a Career Development Fellowship (to Dr Jago) supported by the National Institute for Health Research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health.

References (34)

  • D.T. Barradas et al.

    Parental influences on youth television viewing

    J. Pediatr.

    (2008)
  • S.J. Biddle et al.

    Physical activity and sedentary behaviours in youth: issues and controversies

    J. R. Soc. Promot. Health

    (2004)
  • V. Braun et al.

    Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Qual. Res. Psychol.

    (2006)
  • E.L. Deci et al.

    A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1999)
  • E. Dorey et al.

    Children and television watching: a qualitative study of New Zealand parents' perceptions and views

    Child Care Health Dev.

    (2009)
  • U. Ekelund et al.

    TV viewing and physical activity are independently associated with metabolic risk in children: the European youth health study

    PLoS Med.

    (2006)
  • L.H. Epstein et al.

    Reducing sedentary behaviour: role in modifying physical activity

    Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Coach autonomy support predicts autonomous motivation and daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary time in youth sport participants

      2014, Psychology of Sport and Exercise
      Citation Excerpt :

      Accelerometers provide an accurate means of assessing frequency, intensity and duration of PA (Trost, 2007). In SDT-grounded research on adults, accelerometers have been utilised to investigate the relationships between motivation and MVPA (Sebire, Standage, & Vansteenkiste, 2011; Standage, Sebire, & Loney, 2008; Teixeira et al., 2012). However, among youth, very few studies exist that have employed accelerometers to investigate the associations between the psychosocial correlates of PA and daily, leisure time, and/or domain specific engagement in MVPA within the framework of SDT (Aelterman et al., 2012; Lonsdale et al., 2013; Owen et al., 2013; Perlman, 2013; Roemmich, Lambiase Ms, McCarthy, Feda, & Kozlowski, 2012; Sebire et al., 2013).

    • The value of social-cognitive theory to reducing preschool TV viewing: A pilot randomized trial

      2012, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      These reductions could be attributable to poor measurement of the behavioral change constructs, and/or to some feature of the intervention not captured by the change constructs. For example, perhaps simply drawing attention to a child's media use motivates parents to make a change (Sebire, et al., 2011). Finally, the finding that the time diaries were not excessively burdensome is a useful one for the design of trials in which high-quality viewing data are important.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text