Original articleBreast and Cervical Cancer Screening Disparities Associated with Disability Severity
Section snippets
Data Source
We analyzed annual data files from the household component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) pooled across 2002 through 2008. The MEPS is conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to obtain nationally representative data on health care use and expenditures. The MEPS sample is based on in-person interviews with households selected from households participating in the previous year's National Health Interview Survey. The survey uses an overlapping panel design, with
Results
Most of our Pap analytic sample reported no limitations (Table 1). Similar proportions reported either basic only or basic and complex limitations, whereas very few reported complex limitations only. This distribution was similar in our mammography analytic sample (no limitations, 77.3%; basic, 11.4%; complex, 1.8%; both, 9.5%). Generally, as age increased so did disability severity. Roughly 14% of women age 18 to 64 years had gone longer than 3 years without a Pap test and one quarter of those
Discussion
Overall, women both with and without disabilities fell short of Healthy People 2020 goals for breast and cervical cancer screening (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2013). However, women with disabilities were less likely to be up to date with mammograms and Pap tests compared with women with no disabilities. This finding supported our first hypothesis and is consistent with several previous studies that have found similar disparities (Armour et al., 2009, Courtney-Long et al., 2011
Limitations
Although the MEPS is a rich data source for analyses of health care use at a population level, there are some limitations. Specific to this study, data on receipt of breast and cervical cancer screening are based on respondent report rather than medical records. As noted, these reports may be susceptible to bias such that some demographic groups overestimate their receipt of screening relative to other groups (Rauscher et al., 2008). We also note that recommendations regarding age at which
Conclusion
Women with more complex or severe disability were less likely to be up to date with breast and cervical cancer screening. Although disparities in receipt of mammography were accounted for by demographic, socioeconomic, and insurance variables, this was not the case for Pap testing. Targeted efforts are needed to reduce barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening for women with significant disabilities. These may be especially important for lower income, less educated, minority women living
Acknowledgments
This research was supported in part by grant #90DD0684 from the Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and by the Institute on Development & Disability at Oregon Health & Science University. Development of the MEPS analytic dataset used in this study was supported in part by grant #H133A080031 from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education. Both Dr. Horner-Johnson and Mr. Dobbertin had full access to all the data in the
Willi Horner-Johnson is a Research Assistant Professor of Public Health and Preventive Medicine at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, Oregon.
References (42)
- et al.
Pap, mammography, and clinical breast examination screening among women with disabilities: A systematic review
Women's Health Issues
(2013) - et al.
State-level differences in breast and cervical cancer screening by disability status: United States, 2008
Women's Health Issues
(2009) - et al.
Do Medicare patients with disabilities receive preventive services? A population-based study
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
(1999) - et al.
Disability and receipt of clinical preventive services among women
Women's Health Issues
(2006) National healthcare disparities report 2012
(2013)- et al.
Disability and health in the United States, 2001–2005 (DHHS publication; no. (PHS) 2008–1035)
(2008) - et al.
Population-based breast cancer screening in a primary care network
American Journal of Managed Care
(2012) - et al.
Cervical cancer incidence in the United States by area of residence, 1998–2001
Obstetrics & Gynecology
(2007) - et al.
Demographic predictors of mammography and pap smear screening in US women
American Journal of Public Health
(1993) - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Breast cancer screening: The Right to Know Campaign. Accessed...
Use of mammography as a cancer screening tool, 2001 (statistical brief #22)
Use of the Pap test as a cancer screening tool – 2001 (statistical brief #26)
The medical expenditure panel survey: A national information resource to support healthcare cost research and inform policy and practice
Medical Care
Role of patient race/ethnicity, insurance and age on Pap smear compliance across ten community health centers in Florida
Ethnicity & Disease
Factors associated with self-reported mammography use for women with and women without a disability
Journal of Women's Health
Sample design of the medical expenditure panel survey household component, 1998-2007 (methodology report #22)
Table manners: A guide to the pelvic examination for disabled women and health care providers
2012 Annual compendium of disability statistics
Cancer screening - United States, 2010
MMWR - Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
Computer-generated physician and patient reminders: Tools to improve population adherence to selected preventive services
Journal of Family Practice
Cited by (89)
Comorbidity Clusters Among Adults With Cerebral Palsy: A Latent Class Analysis
2024, American Journal of Preventive MedicineThe Association of Cervical Cancer Screening With Disability Type Among U.S. Women (Aged 25–64 Years)
2024, American Journal of Preventive MedicineSkin Cancer Diagnosis Among People With Disabilities
2023, American Journal of Preventive MedicineReaching for equitable care: High levels of disability-related knowledge and cultural competence only get us so far
2022, Disability and Health JournalCitation Excerpt :Approaches toward and understanding of appropriate care for patients with disabilities varied more widely in non-physician participants. Our work aligns with much of the published literature by demonstrating persistent barriers to equitable care for patients with disabilities across built structures; resource availability; and in the understanding, behaviors, and attitudes that underly the disability cultural competence continuum.1–6,8–10,27,28 We build on this literature with the comprehensive nature of our work involving structural and qualitative evaluation of an entire department.
Willi Horner-Johnson is a Research Assistant Professor of Public Health and Preventive Medicine at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, Oregon.
Konrad Dobbertin is a Research Assistant in the Institute on Disability and Development at Oregon Health & Science University.
Elena Andresen is Professor of Epidemiology, Chief of the Disability and Health Research Group, and Director of the Oregon Office on Disability and Health at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, Oregon.
Lisa Iezzoni is Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Director of the Mongan Institute for Health Policy at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. Dr. Iezzoni is a member of the Institute of Medicine in the National Academy of Sciences.
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.