The problems of relative deprivation: Why some societies do better than others
Introduction
A typical approach to examining contextual area effects on health is to start by controlling out the compositional effects of the socioeconomic characteristics of the population in those areas (Diez-Roux, 1998; Merlo, 2003; Pickett & Pearl, 2001). Because individual characteristics usually have the most powerful influence on the local health profile, researchers adjust for them in order to see whether there are residual positive or negative health effects associated with features of the area itself.
At the local area level the proportion of people with various socioeconomic characteristics may be primarily a distributional issue—how does an area become a deprived area, inhabited by a disproportionate share of poorer, less well-educated people, while a neighbouring area attracts better off people (Macintyre, Maciver, & Sooman, 1993; Tunstall, Shaw, & Dorling, 2004)? However, on another level this is not a question about the distribution in physical space of people with given characteristics, it is instead about the social forces which create those characteristics in the first place. What determines the proportions of people in the wider society belonging to different social classes, in different income groups, with different levels of educational qualifications? The answer to a question like that may seem to depend on the outcome of hundreds of different processes covering every aspect of poverty and wealth creation: educational policies and teaching methods, social mobility, cycles of deprivation, the durability of class cultures—to name but a few, all involving the complexities and minutiae of interactions between individuals, their social environments, and the wider society. However, in this paper we will show that a wide range of problems associated with relative deprivation (including ill health, teenage births, violence, low trust, the educational performance of school children, imprisonment, drug abuse, and obesity), are all strongly related to one factor—societal measures of income distribution.
Rather than being left with the infinite complexities of different determinants of people's standard of health, education, propensities to violence, risks of teenage pregnancy, imprisonment, etc., and trying to formulate separate policies which might have an impact on each of these, it may be that there are also some simpler patterns. If the distribution of each of these health and social problems is related to relative deprivation within societies, and also all tend to be more common in more unequal societies, then perhaps this tells us something fundamental about the impact of the processes of social differentiation within the population.
In this paper, we consider income inequality as both an indicator and a determinant of the scale of social stratification in a society. The range of outcomes which we shall show are statistically related to income distribution suggests that income inequality is related to deep-seated processes of social differentiation. Rather than thinking of populations as made up of basically similar people who—by luck or judgement—have become attached to different incomes and make up societies with different levels of income inequality, we suggest that the social processes related to income distribution are involved in the deeper ways our personal and class characteristics are constituted (Bourdieu, 1984). As Williams (1995) argues, in discussing Bourdieu's complex concept of “habitus” it “is the (class-related) habitus which … determine(s) not only lifestyles and the chances of success…but also class-related inequalities in health and illness” and, as we would argue, also determines class-related inequalities in many other outcomes. The social processes which become structured round income distribution probably also include many of the early childhood influences on social and cognitive development which seem to affect both health and social mobility and are important in social class differentiation (Ben-Shlomo & Kuh, 2002).
Our theory is that processes of social status differentiation, including whether a society has a more or less hierarchical class structure, are intimately related to the scale of income distribution. For several reasons we believe, along with others, that these processes are structured primarily at the national level. As Taylor and Flint (2000) state, “classes have most commonly defined themselves on a state-by-state basis”. Our thinking is not only based on the fact that the distribution of income reflects market incomes (earned and unearned) from the national economy, plus the effects of varying degrees of redistribution resulting from national systems of taxes and benefits; it is also informed by our recent review of the literature on income inequality and health (Wilkinson & Pickett, 2006). We found, as had been noted in previous studies and commentaries (Franzini, Ribble, & Spears, 2001; Wilkinson, 1997), that population health is most reliably related to income distribution when income differences are measured across nation-states and other large geo-political units. Indeed, the evidence suggested a graded relationship such that small area studies in parishes, neighbourhoods and counties showed either weak or non-existent relationships; studies of states, regions and cities tended to show stronger, more consistent relationships; and studies comparing nation-states showed the strongest and most consistent evidence. This observation is given additional weight by the fact that the same pattern was independently reported in an earlier review of studies looking at the relationship between income inequality and violence (Hsieh & Pugh, 1993).
We realise that there has been considerable debate within the disciplines of economic and political geography concerning the spatial scales at which social processes are structured, and the complex ways in which systems operating at different scales interact. However, as Brenner (2001, p. 606) points out “Whether or not the scalar structuration of a given social process generates sociologically or politically significant outcomes is an empirical question that can only be resolved through context-specific inquiries” (Brenner, 2001). We are sensitive to Marston's point that “contemporary writing about scale in human geography has failed to comprehend the real complexity behind the social construction of scale” (Marston, 2000) and her argument that the emphasis has too often been on the functional agency of “the international economy” or to “national social formations”, while “other social practices are cordoned off in their respective localities” ignoring the fact “that even the most privileged social actors…are no less (locally) situated than the workers they seek to command” (Marston, Jones, & Woodward, 2005). Nevertheless, the role of nationally constituted social differentiation in relation to health and social outcomes remains an open question, and one that can be empirically examined.
Income inequalities in large areas can of course be decomposed into income inequalities within and between their smaller constituent areas (Lobmayer & Wilkinson, 2002). And of course social comparisons with neighbours may sometimes have detectable effects on health. Nevertheless, as Ballas asks, “do (people) compare themselves to “peer groups” in their neighbourhood, city, region, country or possibly to diaspora groups in other countries or with people of whom they know little? There are many other kinds of non-geographical groups…to which we may compare ourselves and with whom we consider ourselves to be of a similar social standing. It is far from clear how reference groups are constituted” (Ballas, Dorling, & Shaw, 2007). As we have argued previously, the health of people in a deprived neighbourhood is worse not because of inequalities within that neighbourhood, but because they are deprived in relation to the wider society. To give a particularly dramatic example, consider that in 1996, black American men had a median income of $26,522 and an average life expectancy of only 66.1 years. In comparison, men in Costa Rica had a mean income (at purchasing power parity) of only $6410, yet their average life expectancy was 75 years (Marmot & Wilkinson, 2001). To call any local level of income an effect of “absolute” income (or education or deprivation), and to assume that its relation to health is independent of the wider context is to forget that poor areas are poor in relation to the wider society.
Rather than ignoring the fabric of people's lives which, as Marston (2000) pointed out are always locally situated, we are suggesting that social classes are constituted in relation to each other partly through what may look like action at a distance—through the effects of the population class structure outside one's immediate locality.
We start our empirical investigation by summarising previously published evidence suggesting that the societal scale of income inequality is related to morbidity and mortality, obesity, teenage birth rates, mental illness, homicide, low trust, low social capital, hostility, and racism. We then go on to test new hypotheses, that poor educational performance among school children, the proportion of the population imprisoned, drug overdose mortality and low social mobility are also related to greater income inequality. We would emphasise that the issue throughout is not that greater income inequality means simply greater inequality in outcomes localised within societies, but that greater income inequality is associated with a higher prevalence of ill health and social problems in a society as a whole, regardless of its social distribution.
Section snippets
Morbidity and mortality
In a recent review of 168 analyses of the relationship between income inequality and population health, we found that a large majority of studies reported that more egalitarian societies tend to be healthier (Wilkinson & Pickett, 2006). Studies of small areas—such as parishes and census tracts—were the only major exceptions to this pattern. We found 104 studies of health in which income inequality was measured across whole nations, states, regions or cities—areas large enough for income
New analyses
In the light of these findings we decided to see if there were relations between inequality and other social problems associated with relative deprivation. The outcomes we were able to look at were limited by the availability of comparable data but, in addition to the outcomes discussed above, we now report analyses of the relationship between income inequality and the educational performance of school children, prison populations, drug overdose mortality, and social mobility.
Discussion
The evidence outlined here, consistent as it is across outcomes and setting, goes some way to establishing the simple but important point that numerous social problems associated with relative deprivation—from ill health to poorer educational performance—are more common in more unequal societies.
For comparability with earlier work the new analyses presented in this paper used Pearson correlation coefficients, which assume normal distributions and linearity. However, we found that the use of
Conclusions
It is often assumed that the desire to raise national standards of performance in fields such as education and health is a quite separate problem from the desire to reduce health and educational inequalities within a society. However, perhaps the most important implication of the relationships with inequality shown here is that the achievement of higher national standards of performance may be substantially dependent on reducing inequalities in each country. As well as improving health,
References (78)
- et al.
From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium
Social Science & Medicine
(2000) - et al.
Intragenerational mobility and mortality in Oslo: Social selection versus social causation
Social Science & Medicine
(2005) - et al.
Psychosocial and neo-material dimensions of SES and health revisited: Predictors of self-rated health in a Canadian national survey
Social Science & Medicine
(2006) - et al.
Teen births, income inequality, and social capital: Developing an understanding of the causal pathway
Health and Place
(2002) - et al.
Do attitude and area influence health? A multilevel approach to health inequalities
Health and Place
(2000) - et al.
Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence
Social Science & Medicine
(2006) Reducing drug-related deaths
(2000)Measures of inequality
American Sociological Review
(1978)- et al.
Social inequality, health, and well-being
- et al.
A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: Conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives
International Journal of Epidemiology
(2002)
Global and national inequality: Are they connected?
Journal of World-Systems Research
Mixed communities in England
Intergenerational mobility in Europe and North America
Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy
Current Anthropology
Distinction
The limits to scale? Methodological reflections of scalar structuration
Progess in Human Geography
Democracy in America
Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys
Journal of American Medical Association
Tackling health inequalities: Status report on the programme for action
Bringing context back into epidemiology: Variables and fallacies in multi-level analysis
American Journal of Public Health
Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: The causation-selection issue
Science
Egalitarianism and Machiavellian intelligence in human evolution
The effects of income inequality and income level on mortality vary by population size in Texas counties
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Ecological analysis of teen birth rates: Association with community income and income inequality
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Social factors and health: The causation-selection issue revisited
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA
Epidemiology
Teenage pregnancy and parenthood: A review of reviews. Evidence briefing
The environment and disease: Association or causation?
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine
Poverty, income inequality, and violent crime: A meta-analysis of recent aggregate data studies
Criminal Justice Review
Socioeconomic status and mental illness: Tests of the social causation and selection hypotheses
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
Income inequality and economic residential segregation
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Social capital, income inequality, and mortality
American Journal of Public Health
(Dis)respect and black mortality
Ethnicity and Disease
Inequality, residential segregation by income, and mortality in US cities
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Income inequality and mortality: Importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions
British Medical Journal
Area, class and health: Should we be focusing on places or people?
Journal of Social Policy
Cited by (383)
The impact of family socioeconomic status on depression in Chinese adolescents: A comparison of life course models
2024, Journal of Affective DisordersPerceived social position, active engagement with life, and depressive symptoms among older adults
2024, Social Science and MedicineThe Role of Childhood Circumstances on Social Conditions and Health of Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Ardakan Cohort Study on Aging (ACSA)
2024, Journal of Applied Gerontology