Short scales for measuring schizotypy
Introduction
Over the past several decades many self-report scales have been developed for measuring schizotypal personality traits in non-clinical individuals (for reviews see Chapman et al., 1995, Mason et al., 1997b). Factor analytic studies of these measures have most frequently supported either three or four components, depending on the number and item content of scales included in the analyses (Claridge et al., 1996, Vollema and van den Bosch, 1995). The Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences (O-LIFE) is an instrument based on analysis of what is probably the largest single dataset of schizotypal measures (Claridge et al., 1996). It contains four sub-scales called ‘Unusual Experiences’, ‘Cognitive Disorganisation’, ‘Introvertive Anhedonia’ and ‘Impulsive Nonconformity’. Since its introduction, the O-LIFE has enjoyed wide currency. Early work established its high internal consistency (Mason et al., 1995) and test–retest reliability (Burch et al., 1998). It has also been used in a variety of studies across many research domains, firmly establishing its construct validity as a genuine measure of schizotypal traits. Laboratory investigations have demonstrated predictable effects in relation to neuropsychological function (e.g. Avons et al., 2003); on several perceptual and attentional paradigms (e.g. Steel et al., 2002); in psychophysiological responding (e.g. Mason et al., 1997a); on reasoning tasks (e.g. Sellen et al., 2005) and in learning, notably on measures of ‘latent inhibition’ (e.g. Moran et al., 2003). Differences have also been found in hemispheric function: for language task performance (Nunn and Peters, 2001), face processing (Mason and Claridge, 1999), and handedness (Shaw et al., 2001). With clinical relevance, the O-LIFE has been used successfully to investigate schizotypy in relation to such topics as dissociative experience and childhood abuse (Startup, 1999) and paranormal beliefs and experiences as a function of mental health (Goulding, 2004). It is also important that there is evidence for a genetic basis as measures of this type are otherwise open to the criticism that they are merely phenomenologically or, in Meehl's (1993) terms, ‘pseudo-phenotypically’ related to schizophrenia. A recent large quantitative genetic analysis (Linney et al., 2003) has established convincing heritability estimates for the scales. However, at over 100 items, the full scales are arguably cumbersome and a shortened form is very desirable. We felt that it was very important to retain those aspects of schizotypy most relevant to ‘true’ proneness to disorder without losing the broad ‘flavour’ of each trait. By using a twin sample we aimed to retain, and even to maximise, the degree of genotypic variance captured by items without compromising scale content.
Section snippets
Participants
Nine hundred twenty-eight twin pairs (mean age 47) from the Institute of Psychiatry Volunteer Twin Register gave informed consent and completed the measure. None of the participants reported having had a psychotic breakdown. Zygosity was assessed using a series of questions that have been found to discriminate MZ from DZ twins with over 95% reliability (Cederlöf et al., 1961, Sarna and Kaprio, 1980). Seventy were monozygotic male pairs, 468 were monozygotic female pairs, 29 were dizygotic male
Results
The items selected for short scales are given in Table 1. An affirmative answer to each item contributes one point, with reverse scoring for those indicated. Descriptive statistics are reported in Table 2. Their internal consistency was calculated using the alpha coefficient with all four exceeding 0.6. While Nunnally (1978) suggests that coefficients of 0.7 are ideal, he describes 0.6 as an acceptable level of given measurement error in psychological/social science. The concurrent validity was
Discussion
The approach to item selection used Plomin's logic (2000, p.80) that ‘to the extent that identical twin concordances are greater than fraternal twin concordance genetic influence is implied’. However, the method aimed to ensure good reliability, content validity and concurrent validity in addition to retaining heritability, and results supported these. The short scales are intended for research use in non-clinical samples and it is important to highlight that they are not intended
References (24)
- et al.
Executive function assessed by memory updating and random generation in schizotypal individuals
Psychiatr. Res.
(2003) Schizotypy models in relation to subjective health and paranormal beliefs and experiences
Pers. Individ. Differ.
(2004)- et al.
New scales for the assessment of schizotypy
Pers. Individ. Differ.
(1995) - et al.
Electrodermal relationships with personality measures of psychosis-proneness in psychotic and normal subjects
Int. J. Psychophysiol.
(1997) - et al.
Reduced Kamin blocking in non-paranoid schizophrenia: associations with schizotypy
J. Psychiatr. Res.
(2003) - et al.
Schizotypy and patterns of lateral asymmetry on hemisphere-specific language tasks
Psychiatr. Res.
(2001) - et al.
Schizotypy and the shift from dextrality: a study of handedness in a large non-clinical population
Schizophr. Res.
(2001) - et al.
Oxford-Liverpool inventory of feelings and experiences: reliability in an experimental population
Br. J. Clin. Psychol.
(1998) - et al.
Studies on similarity diagnosis in twins with the aid of mailed questioners
Acta Genet. Stat. Med.
(1961) - et al.
Scales for the measurement of schizotypy
The factor structure of ‘schizotypal’ traits: a large replication study
Br. J. Clin. Psychol.
Cognitive, dissociative, and psychotogenic effects of ketamine in recreational users on the night of drug use and 3 days later
Addiction
Cited by (244)
Metacognitive monitoring in schizotypy: Systematic literature review and new empirical data
2023, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental PsychiatrySchizotypy dimensions do not predict overshadowing
2023, Behavioural Brain ResearchThe effect of brief mindfulness training on the micro-structure of human free-operant responding: Mindfulness affects stimulus-driven responding; Mindfulness and schedule performance
2023, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental PsychiatryDelay discounting in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2023, Behavioural Brain ResearchWhen religious fundamentalists feel privileged: Findings from a representative study in contemporary Turkey
2023, Current Research in Ecological and Social PsychologyImpact of previous reinforcement on false perceptions for individuals lower and higher in schizotypy traits: Schizoptypy and false perceptions
2023, Personality and Individual Differences