Quality of careThe quality of radiation care: The results of focus group interviews and concept mapping to explore the patient’s perspective
Section snippets
Focus group interviews
Four focus group interviews were organised with (former) cancer patients who had recently received radiotherapy. Three radiotherapy centres agreed to participate in the study; one hospital specialising in cancer located in the capital city Amsterdam (region A), and two located in the more Eastern area (region B) of which one is an independent radiotherapy centre and one a radiotherapy department of an academic hospital. A letter of invitation signed by a radiation oncologist was sent to
Respondents
A total of 35 patients were willing to participate in the four focus group discussions (response 12.5%) resulting in 3–14 participants per group. A total of 28 patients (response 14.5%) took part in the concept mapping meetings; 17 in region A and 11 in region B.
The patient demographics are displayed in Table 1. Most participants were male, between 70 and 79 years, and had received higher education. Furthermore, most men received radiotherapy treatment for prostate cancer, whereas most of the
Results from the focus group interviews
Differences in experiences of the radiation care received led to four interactive focus group discussions. After the fourth focus group, we believed we had reached data saturation, as hardly any new quality of radiation care aspects was introduced. During the discussions, participants had difficulty keeping focused on radiotherapy treatment instead of discussing their overall treatment. However, sharing experiences with peers and learning from each other was considered as helpful in coping.
The
Results from the concept mapping procedure
The results of the first rating assignment of the concept mapping are presented as the top 10 mean importance scores (Table 2). Quality aspects that were highly valued refer to the professional competence of healthcare providers, information services, a patient-centred approach and good cooperation between healthcare professionals and (hospital) departments.An overview of all the quality aspects and their mean importance scores as included in the concept mapping procedure is presented in
Concept map
Data from the concept mapping assignments yielded a graphical presentation of all the quality aspects and their interrelationships. A nine-cluster solution was chosen as this resulted in the best interpretation of clusters (Fig. 1). The distance between the aspects, which are represented as dots with numbers, illustrates the degree of similarity between quality aspects. Clusters indicated by squares represent groups of mean statements based on similarity. The nine clusters are more or less the
Discussion
In this study, we explored patients’ experiences with radiation care and how important these aspects are in determining the quality of radiation care from the patients’ perspective. As a result, we gained more insight into the variety and especially the importance of quality of aspects. These can be arranged in seven themes: information provision, a patient-centred approach, professional competence, planning and waiting times, accessibility, cooperation and communication, and follow-up care.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
Role of the funding source
This work supported by the NVRO (Dutch Society of Radiation Oncologists).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all the patients who participated in this study and would like to thank them for sharing their experiences with us. We would also like to thank the staff of the Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam, Arnhem Radiotherapy Institute, and the Department of Radiotherapy Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre for recruiting patients. Appreciation is also expressed to all stakeholders participating in the project meetings and Tessera Translations BV for linguistic advice.
References (36)
- et al.
Towards more patient centred healthcare: A new Consumer Quality Index instrument to assess patients’ experiences with breast care
Eur J Cancer
(2009) - et al.
Medical oncology patients’ preferences with regard to health care: development of a patient-driven questionnaire
Ann Oncol
(2009) - et al.
Quality of care from the perspective of the cataract patient
QUOTE cataract questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg
(2002) - et al.
The patient’s perspective of the quality of breast cancer care
The development of an instrument to measure quality of care through focus groups and concept mapping with breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer
(2007) An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation
Eva Program Plann
(1989)- et al.
What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature
Soc Sci Med
(1988) - et al.
Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis
Soc Sci Med
(1990) Role of the radiation oncology nurse
Semin Oncol Nurs
(2006)- et al.
Consumer-driven health plans: are they more than talk now?
Health Aff (Millwood)
(2002) - et al.
Consumer-driven health plans: lessons from Switzerland
JAMA
(2004)
Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction
J Adv Nurs
Quality of care from the perspective of elderly people: the QUOTE-elderly instrument
Age Ageing
Assessing noninstitutionalized asthma and COPD patients’ priorities and perceptions of quality of health care: the development of the QUOTE-CNSLD instrument
J Asthma
Quality of care from the patients’ perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument
Health Expect
Factors that influence cancer patients’ overall perceptions of the quality of care
Int J Qual Health Care
Quality of care experienced by Finnish cancer patients during radiotherapy
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)
Cited by (21)
Trauma-Informed Radiation Therapy: Implementation and Evaluation of a Sensitive Practice Tool for Female Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
2022, Journal of the American College of RadiologyCitation Excerpt :We also included an open-ended question asking about other traumatic or difficult experiences that might affect the patient’s radiotherapy experience. Third, a computer-generated report was provided to radiation therapists with the results of the patient survey [27-30]. The goal of the report was to inform the development of a personalized sensitive practice care plan [31-32].
An impact model to understand and improve work-life balance in early-career researchers in radiation oncology
2022, Clinical and Translational Radiation OncologyPatients’ experiences of radiotherapy: Insights from Twitter
2020, RadiographyCitation Excerpt :Questions posted on Twitter were shared throughout the treatment pathway and tended to transition from general information seeking to side-effect management. This is perhaps unsurprising given the cumulative effect of radiotherapy and shows how patients’ information needs change over time, as asserted in previous work.7,38,39 Perales and colleagues point out that evidence of information seeking can be indicative of an unmet information need.23