Self ManagementA secondary analysis of the moderating effects of depression and multimorbidity on the effectiveness of a chronic disease self-management programme
Introduction
An ageing population and improvements in health care means that the global burden of disease is shifting to long-term conditions [1], and there is increasing interest in improving health by changing patient behaviour through self-management support [2]. Partly this derives from concerns about the costs of health care utilisation, and partly from data suggesting that self-management is a core driver of improved outcomes in long-term conditions [3]. In the United Kingdom, self-management is defined as:
‘the care taken by individuals towards their own health and well being: it comprises the actions they take to lead a healthy lifestyle; to meet their social, emotional and psychological needs; to care for their long-term condition; and to prevent further illness or accidents’ [4]
Group-based interventions such as the chronic disease self-management programme (CDSMP) are a key source of self-management support [5], [6], [7]. These interventions are designed to teach a range of self-management skills and techniques, and to enhance patient self-efficacy in the management of long-term conditions and their functional and emotional sequelae. The CDSMP can be used with patients with a variety of conditions. Secondary analyses have identified patient characteristics that predict benefit (i.e. moderators of treatment effect) [8], [9]. Our recent analysis found that patients reporting lower baseline self-efficacy and quality of life demonstrated more positive health outcomes following the CDSMP [10].
Many patients seeking support for self-management have more than one condition (so-called multimorbidity) [11] and this is associated with poor outcomes [12], [13]. However, key questions about the impact of multimorbidity remain.
First, what is the mechanism? There are a variety of plausible theories of the mechanisms that might cause patients with multimorbidity to have poor outcomes, including biological interactions between disorders [14], [15], but self-management remains a potential candidate. Patients with multimorbidity have to deal with multiple self-management activities with limited resources of energy, time, attention and motivation [16], [17] and potentially face complex decisions about priorities among self-management tasks [18], [19]. This may reduce their ability to conduct effective self-management and lead to poor outcomes.
The second key question concerns the types of multimorbidity and the combinations of conditions that are particularly associated with poor outcomes. For many long-term conditions (such as diabetes and coronary heart disease), there are potential synergies, where several conditions benefit from the same self-management (e.g. exercise). A recent study found that patients with multimorbidity who took part in a disease management programme reported significant improvements [20]. However, depression is a common disorder which is often co-morbid with long-term conditions such as diabetes [21]. The co-existence of depression and diabetes may lead to underregulation of diabetes (i.e. where depression lowers patient self-efficacy to undertake self-management) or mis-regulation (i.e. where improvements in depression lead to changes in diet which in turn have a negative effect on diabetes management) [22]. However, even here the evidence is unclear. Although depression is often associated with reduced self-management in observational studies [23], patients with long-term conditions who report comorbid depression have been reported as demonstrating greater benefits after attending the CDSMP [24].
At present, the mechanisms by which multimorbidity impacts on patient outcomes are unclear. We have previously demonstrated that patients with high baseline levels of illness severity are more likely to report favourable outcomes from the CDSMP [10]. However, in this previous study, severity was assessed through specific research assessments and not through routine data. Therefore, this finding is less useful in everyday practice, because such severity data are not routinely collected, and practitioners would not be able to access such information easily to inform their clinical decision making. This new analysis extends our previous work by identifying whether assessments of multimorbidity based on numbers of conditions are predictive of patient benefit in the CDSMP in the same way as research assessments of severity. Data on number of conditions are routinely available in practice, and thus the present analysis will determine whether measures of multimorbidity provide a more clinically useful and practical aid to clinical decision making about referral to CDSMP.
In summary, we used secondary analysis of data from our published CDSMP trial to test whether multimorbidity moderated outcomes from the CDSMP, to determine whether multimorbidity predicted level of benefit from the course and could be used in routine clinical decision making about referral to the CDSMP.
Section snippets
Design
The analysis was based on a trial of the cost-effectiveness of an Anglicised version of the CDSMP (the ‘Expert Patients Programme’ – ISRCTN70532349) [7], [25]. Volunteer patients (n = 629) with a range of self-reported long-term conditions were recruited from community settings, allocated to the CSDMP or a wait list control and 83% followed-up at 6 months. The course involved six 150 min weekly group sessions, each group consisting of 8–12 participants. Groups were led by a pair of lay trainers or
Results
At baseline, there were significant differences between multimorbidity categories in demographic variables (age, marital status, accommodation and employment) and self-reported main condition (Table 1). There were also significant differences in self-management: patients with ‘probable depression’ reported less use of diet, complementary therapy or relaxation. All groups with multimorbidity reported less exercise. There were also baseline differences in health measures: patients with a single
Discussion
In our secondary analysis, multimorbidity moderated the impact of the CDSMP on three of six outcomes: vitality; health-related quality of life; and mental well-being. Patients with the highest level of multimorbidity burden who received CDSMP gained substantially on these outcomes relative to controls, whereas outcomes for CDSMP and control patients with other patterns of multimorbidity did not differ from outcomes for patients with single conditions. For mental well-being, this might reflect
Acknowledgements
The original trial on which this analysis was based was funded by the United Kingdom Department of Health. Further analysis was funded as part of the United Kingdom National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. We thank Dr. Tom Blakeman for assisting with the coding of the long-term conditions.
References (42)
- et al.
Integrating co-morbid depression and chronic physical disease management: identifying and resolving failures in self-regulation
Clin Psychol Rev
(2008) - et al.
Self management interventions for chronic illness
Lancet
(2004) - et al.
The relationship of depressive symptoms to symptom reporting, self care and glucose control in diabetes
Gen Hosp Psychiatry
(2003) - et al.
A most stubborn bias: no adjustment method fully resolves confounding by indication in observational studies
J Clin Epidemiol
(2010) - et al.
The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from disease, injuries and risk factors in 1990
(1996) - et al.
Care for chronic diseases
Brit Med J
(2002) - et al.
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the Chronic Care Model, part 2
J Amer Med Assoc
(2002) Self care – a real choice: self care support – a practical option
(2005)- et al.
Evidence suggesting that chronic disease self management can improve health status while reducing hospitalisation: a randomized trial
Med Care
(1999) - et al.
How effective are expert patient (lay led) education programmes for chronic disease?
Brit Med J
(2007)
The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
J Epidemiol Community Health
Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials
Arch Gen Psychiatry
The moderator–mediator distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations
J Pers Soc Psychol
Predicting who will benefit from an Expert Patients Programme self-management course
Brit J Gen Pract
Defining comorbidity: implications for the understanding and provision of health services and health
Ann Fam Med
Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice
Ann Fam Med
Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly
Arch Intern Med
Depression in relation to long-term control of glycemia, blood pressure, and lipids in patients with diabetes
J Gen Intern Med
Depression and cardiovascular disease: mechanisms of interaction
Biol. Psychiatry
Barriers to self management and quality of life outcomes in seniors with multimorbidities
Ann Fam Med
Effects of enhanced depression treatment on diabetes self-care
Ann Fam Med
Cited by (42)
The effect of comorbid depression on the use of unscheduled hospital care by people with a long term condition: A retrospective observational study
2018, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :Qualitative studies addressing why patients with LTCs use unscheduled care would indicate that they often do so because of a sense of pressing need that is not being met by other health services (Langer et al., 2013). Individualised management plans (NICE, 2016), collaborative care approaches (Gunn et al., 2006) and chronic disease self-management programmes (Harrison et al., 2012) may all have particular benefits for this population. This study made use of combined general practice and hospital data that was, respectively, cross-sectional and retrospective in nature.
Physical health among patients with common mental health disorders in primary care in Europe: A scoping review
2021, Irish Journal of Psychological MedicineDiscordant Chronic Conditions and Depressive Symptoms: Longitudinal Associations among Middle-Aged and Older Couples
2021, Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences