Health LiteracyUnderstanding information and education gaps among people with type 1 diabetes: A qualitative investigation
Introduction
With an increasing public health burden arising from chronic diseases such as diabetes, emphasis is placed upon patients to take responsibility for disease self-management. Patient education can lead to improved knowledge and self-management skills [1], which reduces risks of developing complications [2]. In the UK, as in other countries [3], health services are now required to provide diabetes education tailored to patients’ individual, social and cultural needs [4], [5], [6]. An exemplar education course, which is offered to type 1 diabetes patients in the UK, is the Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) programme [7]. Similar programmes are available to patients with type 2 diabetes [8], and in other countries [9], [10].
In seeking to understand why patients may encounter difficulties with disease self-management, studies have found significant knowledge deficits among individuals with diabetes. These include deficits relating to: administering medication; treatment of hypoglycaemia; glucose testing; diet; following sick-day guidelines; foot care; and, understanding of HbA1c results [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. While extensive use has been made of questionnaires to measure patients’ knowledge [14], [16], [17], [18], [19], considerably less attention has been paid to examining and understanding the sources of, and reasons for, diabetes knowledge deficits. When qualitative work, drawing upon patients’ own understandings and views, has been undertaken, it has principally been concerned with examining patients’ current information needs, including those arising during childhood/adolescence [20], [21] and at times of transition in provision of care [22]. Given the emphasis now placed upon individualising educational approaches [4], [5], [23], it is important to explore the origins of, and factors which influence, patients’ knowledge deficits to ensure these are addressed through appropriately tailored interventions.
This study originated from a larger, qualitative study exploring patients’ experiences and views of participating in the DAFNE programme. DAFNE is an established educational intervention for patients with type 1 diabetes in the UK, and is informed by group-based adult learning principles. Two educators (a diabetes specialist nurse and dietician) deliver the programme to groups of 6–8 people, over 5 consecutive days, using a standardised curriculum. Dietary flexibility is promoted by teaching participants to count carbohydrates and use/interpret results from self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) so that they can adjust their insulin dosages according to their food choices. The course also comprises topics on: physical activity, nutrition, managing hypoglycaemia, alcohol, sickness, complications and pregnancy.
The findings reported here are drawn from patients’ post-course interviews, and focus upon accounts of their diabetes knowledge, information received since diagnosis and its sources; and, views on education/knowledge delivery and acquisition and how this could be improved. The aim was to examine and explore how, and why, gaps in patients’ diabetes knowledge originated, in order to inform the development of future educational interventions.
Section snippets
Study sample and design
Individuals who had agreed to attend a DAFNE course were recruited from six courses across five diabetes centres in the UK. Prior to each course, DAFNE educators provided attendees with an information sheet and sought permission for a study team member to contact them to discuss the study and seek consent to participate. Thirty patients were recruited, with the last two courses purposively sampled to ensure diversity of sex, age, occupation and years since diagnosis in the final sample.
Results
Having been on a DAFNE course, many participants conveyed surprise about how poor and fragmented their knowledge and understanding of their diabetes had been prior to course attendance. Several participants, for instance, described how, prior to DAFNE, they had managed their diabetes by avoiding sugary foods as they had not fully understood or appreciated the impact that other foodstuffs could have on their blood glucose control or insulin requirements. Patients, likewise, highlighted a limited
Discussion
This study has identified multiple, overlapping reasons behind the knowledge deficits commonly observed among patients with type 1 diabetes. Our findings demonstrate that patients’ perceived need for, receptiveness to, and ability to access diabetes knowledge may shift and change over time, depending on: their lifecourse position; during transitions in care provision; according to personal/family circumstances; in response to whether they feel well or have begun to experience complications; as
Disclosure statement
I confirm all patient/personal identifiers have been removed or disguised so the patient/person(s) described are not identifiable and cannot be identified through the details of the story.
Acknowledgements
This study is funded by the NIHR as part of a broader programme of research entitled ‘Improving management of type 1 diabetes in the UK: the DAFNE programme as a research test bed’. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the other members of the DAFNE research collaborative and the patients and educators who took part. We would particularly like to thank Marie Clark, Debbie Cooke and Celia Emery for their hard work in helping to secure ethics and R&D approvals, and in the recruitment of
References (31)
- et al.
Patient psychological and information needs when diagnosis is diabetes
Patient Educ Couns
(1996) - et al.
Knowledge and diabetes self-management
Patient Educ Couns
(1996) - et al.
Lifecourse and lifestyle: the social and cultural location of health behaviours
Soc Sci Med
(1995) - et al.
Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education
Diab Care
(2002) DAFNE (Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating) – Structured education in insulin replacement therapy for type 1 diabetics
Med J Aust
(2006)Guidance on the use of patient-education models for diabetes: Technology Appraisal 60
(2003)National Service Framework for Diabetes: Standards
(2003)Scottish Diabetes Framework Action Plan
(2006)Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with type 1 diabetes: dose adjustment for normal eating (DAFNE) randomised controlled trial
Br Med J
(2002)- et al.
Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self-management for ongoing and newly diagnoses (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial
Br Med J
(2008)
Evaluation of an intensified insulin treatment and teaching programme as routine management of type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes: the Bucharest-Dusseldorf study
Diabetologia
Lifestyle intervention by group care prevents deterioration of Type II diabetes: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical trial
Diabetologia
Diabetes self-management education
Diab Care
The relationship between knowledge of recent HbA1c values and diabetes care understanding and self-management
Diabetes Care
An assessment of patients’ knowledge of diabetes, its management and complications
Pract Diab Int
Cited by (37)
Diabetes structured self-management education programmes: a narrative review and current innovations
2018, The Lancet Diabetes and EndocrinologyCitation Excerpt :Diabetes is a lifelong condition and the long-term effects of self-management education need investigation, especially the effects on complications, cardiovascular events, and mortality. Qualitative research in people with type 1 diabetes who had attended self-management education identified insufficient ongoing support from knowledgeable professionals; literacy and numeracy challenges when calculating doses; and frustration among individuals who had followed the rules but still not achieved their targets.97 Similar findings have been reported in people with type 2 diabetes in relation to self-monitoring of blood glucose and medication adjustment.98
Patient generated "frequently asked questions": Identifying informational needs in a RCT of peer support in type 2 diabetes
2013, Primary Care DiabetesCitation Excerpt :This may not be surprising as information giving and self management training in the clinical setting for patients with diabetes has been shown to be poor [6], in spite of evidence that supports its effectiveness in the short term in improving outcomes [7]. The reasons for knowledge deficits in patients are diverse but include inconsistency in information provision, lack of motivation and lack of awareness that knowledge was poor or incomplete [8,9]. Peer support may provide an opportunity to address some of these areas.
Type 1 Diabetes Patient Experiences Before and After Transfer from a Paediatric to an Adult Hospital
2022, Patient Preference and Adherence‘Adolescents are reckless’: Representations at stake in the construction of the relationship of trust in paediatric diabetology
2021, Journal of Health PsychologyCommunicatively Exploring Uncertainty Management of Parents of Children with Type 1 Diabetes
2019, Health Communication