Elsevier

Midwifery

Volume 26, Issue 5, October 2010, Pages 512-519
Midwifery

Supporting patient safety: Examining communication within delivery suite teams through contrasting approaches to research observation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.04.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

to explore the nature of intra- and interprofessional communication on delivery suites, with a particular focus on patient safety.

Design

longitudinal study using contrasting forms of observation: ethnographic methods alongside the highly structured Interaction Process Analysis (IPA) framework.

Setting

four contrasting delivery suites offering different models of care and serving different populations: two in the north of England and two in London.

Participants

the multidisciplinary delivery suite teams and visiting professionals from related areas.

Key findings

the ethnographic observations and quantitative findings combine to highlight four principal areas relating to communication: communication underpinning collaboration; effects of workload pressures on communication practices; interprofessional communication; and the influence of architecture on communication. Contextual factors (e.g. case acuity, client throughput, model of care) underscore some inter site differences and attention is drawn to implications for safety.

Conclusions and implications for practice

the use of complementary methods aided exploration of communication in the complex environment of the delivery suite. The findings reflect the complexity of communication patterns and the multiple influences on patterns and norms. Interprofessional tensions, workload pressures and the design of the environment can restrict communication, with implications for safety. As such, these findings have implications for policy in that safety solutions which focus efforts on standardising communication need to be located within wider strategies that also address structural and organisational networks and influences.

Introduction

This paper reports aspects of an in-depth, longitudinal mixed methods study of four delivery suites (DS) over a two-year period, during which interprofessional simulation-based training for senior staff was introduced. The structure of the overall project and an overview of the multifaceted findings, including mothers’ views, can be found in the project’s final report (Freeth et al., 2008). The present paper will examine aspects of communication within the DS environments that are pertinent to maintaining safety, and will present insights gained from interrogating complementary datasets generated through contrasting forms of observation. The findings will be grouped into four themes (communication underpinning collaboration, effects of workload pressures, interprofessional communication and architectural influences).

Effective communication is central to quality health care (Audit Commission, 1993). Communication failures contribute to preventable errors and adverse care outcomes (Leonard et al., 2004). Within the domain of obstetrics and gynaecology, failure to communicate effectively is the most common cause of medical errors (White et al., 2005). These failures are usually caused by a disruption in the flow of critical patient-relevant information between or among caregivers, and thus an error in judgment or in the decision-making process occurs (Collins, 2008).

The Department of Health (e.g. Department of Health, 1993), the Royal Colleges (e.g. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists/Royal College of Midwives, 1995) and others (e.g. O’Neill, 2008) have recognised the importance of communication for promoting quality and safety in maternity care, and have been involved in initiatives to raise standards. ‘Towards Better Births’ highlights the importance of good communication for woman-centred care (Healthcare Commission, 2008a). Multidisciplinary working and communication are vital for successful outcomes (Department of Health, 2007).

Difficulties in relaying and interpreting information across interprofessional boundaries have been documented extensively (National Patient Safety Agency, 2007, O'Neill, 2008). Several reports detail inter- and intra-professional rivalries in maternity care (between obstetric consultants, obstetric consultants and midwives, obstetricians and gynaecologists) (Commission for Health Improvement, 2003, Healthcare Commission (HCC), 2004, Healthcare Commission, 2006). Occupational and hierarchical boundaries contribute to care management problems with delayed recognition and poor response to clinical deterioration (National Patient Safety Agency, 2007, Healthcare Commission, 2008b). Conclusions drawn from ‘Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths’ show that inadequate vigilance and/or poor responses to problems affected outcomes in 50% of direct maternal deaths; the main factors were poor communication and teamwork (Lewis, 2001, Lewis, 2004). Communication barriers and a lack of collaborative working between health professionals contribute to patient safety risks (Rowe et al., 2001, Rowe et al., 2002).

Team situation awareness (TSA) (Cooke et al., 2001) is a precursor to safe decision-making and performance (Endsley, 2000). This shared awareness acts as the safety net that mitigates the impact of an individuals’ attention narrowing (Burke et al., 2004) due to fixation, overload or distraction. Effective teams hold higher levels of TSA than low-performing teams (Leonard et al., 2004). Elsewhere (Mackintosh et al., 2009), the authors described configurations of processes, roles and artefacts through which the DS teams in this study communicated to establish TSA to inform their decisions and actions. This paper considers other aspects of communication in the DS and the structures that contribute to these.

Section snippets

Research sites

The research sites were purposively selected to provide variation in size, location, local demographics, footfall, client acuity, care model (midwifery-led or consultant-led) and resources. All sites served relatively deprived populations with significant social support needs. Two sites were in the north of England and two in London, labelled Milltown, Romantown, Eastborough and Westborough. Eastborough and Westborough were very busy (5000 and 6000 births per annum). They had high staff

Findings

Analysed through the lens of improving safety in DS care, the observations drew attention to different facets of communication. TSA has been discussed elsewhere (Mackintosh et al., 2009) and four further facets will be described in this paper: communication underpinning collaboration, effects of workload pressures, interprofessional communication, and architectural influences. Examples have been selected from the sites that most clearly illuminated each theme, although data from all sites

Methodological strengths and limitations

To date, patient safety research and interventions focusing on communication have been commonly conducted in operating theatres or intensive care, and have sought to promote more standardised communication (e.g. Catchpole et al., 2007, Lingard et al., 2008, de Vries et al., 2009, Haynes et al., 2009, Association of periOperative Registered Nurses, 2010). Most work in these environments can be observed from a single vantage point and involves relatively stable multidisciplinary teams (Hewett et

Conclusions

Recently, Ovretveit (2009) called for further research to aid understanding of problems and solutions in communication and co-ordination in the ‘in-betweens’ – between professionals and between shifts, professions, units and services.

Within safety discourse, care pathways and trajectories are often depicted as linear and temporal constructions. Communication is also perceived as the transmission of concise, salient information, with little acknowledgement of socio cultural meanings. However,

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the staff of the four participating delivery suites. The study was funded by the UK National Patient Safety Agency, and ethical approval was granted by the South West NHS Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee.

References (59)

  • R. Coe et al.

    Disagreement and aggression in the operating theatre

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (2008)
  • Commission for Health Improvement

    Maternity Services – Ashford & St Peters

    (2003)
  • D. Collins

    Multidisciplinary teamwork approach in labor and delivery and electronic fetal monitoring: a medical–legal perspective

    Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing

    (2008)
  • L.H. Conant

    Use of Bales’ interaction process analysis to study nurse–patient interaction

    Nursing Research

    (1965)
  • N.J. Cooke et al.

    A knowledge elicitation approach to the measurement of team situation awareness

  • E.N. de Vries et al.

    Development and validation of the SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist

    Quality and Safety in Healthcare

    (2009)
  • Department of Health

    Changing Childbirth, Part 1. Report of the Expert Maternity Group

    (1993)
  • Department of Health, Design Council

    Design for Patient Safety

    (2003)
  • Department of Health

    2006 Annual Report of The Chief Medical Officer on the State of Public Health

    (2007)
  • M.R. Endsley

    Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review

  • Y. Engeström et al.

    When the center does not hold: the importance of knotworking

  • Y. Engeström

    From Teams to Knots: Activity-Theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work.

    (2008)
  • Fahy, P.J., 2006. Online and face-to-face group interaction processes compared using Bales’ Interaction Process...
  • J. Firth-Cozens

    Multidisciplinary teamwork: the good, bad, and everything in between

    Quality in Health Care

    (2001)
  • D. Fraser et al.

    A university department merger of midwifery and obstetrics: a step on the journey to enhancing interprofessional learning

    Medical Teacher

    (2000)
  • Freeth D.S., Berridge E.J., Mackintosh N.M., 2008. Evaluation of safety culture and MOSES training in four delivery...
  • B. Freemon et al.

    Gaps in doctor–patient communication: doctor–patient interaction analysis

    Pediatric Research

    (1971)
  • M. Hammersley et al.

    Ethnography: Principles in Practice

    (2007)
  • A.B. Haynes et al.

    A surgical safety checklist to reduce mortality and morbidity in a global population

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text