Shoulder
Diagnostic value of patient characteristics, history, and six clinical tests for traumatic anterior shoulder instability

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.05.006Get rights and content

Background

It is unknown which combination of patient information and clinical tests might be optimal for the diagnosis of traumatic anterior shoulder instability. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of individual clinical tests and to develop a prediction model that combined patient characteristics, history, and clinical tests for diagnosis of traumatic anterior shoulder instability.

Materials and methods

This prospective cohort study included 169 consecutive patients with shoulder complaints who were examined at an orthopaedic outpatient clinic. One experienced clinician conducted 25 clinical tests; of these, 6 were considered to be specific for testing of traumatic anterior shoulder instability (apprehension, relocation, release, anterior drawer, load and shift, and hyperabduction tests). Magnetic resonance arthrography was used to determine the final diagnosis. A prediction model was developed by logistic regression analysis.

Results

In this cohort, 60 patients (36%) were diagnosed with anterior shoulder instability on the basis of magnetic resonance arthrography. The overall accuracy of individual clinical tests was 80.5% to 86.4%. Age, previous shoulder dislocation, sudden onset of complaints, and the release test were important predictors for the diagnosis of traumatic anterior shoulder instability. The prediction model demonstrated high discriminative ability (AUC 0.95).

Conclusion

Individual clinical shoulder tests provide good diagnostic accuracy. Young age, history of shoulder dislocation, sudden onset of complaints, and positive result of the release test were the most important predictors for traumatic anterior shoulder instability.

Section snippets

Patients

This prospective cohort study included new patients with shoulder complaints recruited consecutively between February 2009 and June 2012 at the orthopaedic outpatient clinic. Exclusion criteria were fractures, frozen shoulder, arthritis, and problems with reading and understanding the Dutch language. Institutional approval was obtained by our local Ethics Committee, and written, signed, informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data collection

One experienced orthopaedic surgeon (W.J.W.) performed

Patients

The flow chart of the selection process for the study population is presented in Figure 1. The study included 174 patients with shoulder complaints. One patient had bilateral complaints; thus, 175 shoulders were included. Each patient underwent the standardized testing protocol. Six patients were subsequently excluded; 1 patient went to another hospital because of our waiting list, and 5 patients refused to undergo MRA. Thus, 169 (97%) shoulders were analyzed. Twelve (7%) patients did not

Discussion

This study evaluated the value of individual clinical tests for diagnosis of traumatic anterior shoulder instability. In addition, we developed a prediction model that combined patient characteristics, history, and clinical tests. We found that the patient information was of paramount importance in establishing the diagnosis of traumatic anterior shoulder instability. The individual clinical tests had good diagnostic value, with an overall accuracy that varied between 80.5% and 86.4%. In

Conclusion

We hypothesized that clinical evaluation might improve with a prediction model that combines patient characteristics, history, and clinical tests for the diagnosis of traumatic anterior shoulder instability. In this cohort study, we found that the individual clinical tests for traumatic anterior shoulder instability provided good diagnostic value. Moreover, we developed a prediction model that provided improved diagnostic value, with an AUC of 0.95. Young age, history of shoulder dislocation,

Acknowledgment

We thank Ms. M. Boekhorst for assistance in collecting study data and V.P.M. van der Hulst for assistance as a second radiologist. We also thank the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and the Elbow for a research grant (2009 SECEC/ESSSE), the Anna Foundation for a research grant (2009 Research Grant), and the Marti-Keuning Eckhardt Foundation for financial support.

Disclaimer

The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

References (45)

  • J. Dawson et al.

    The assessment of shoulder instability. The development and validation of a questionnaire

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1999)
  • J. Dawson et al.

    Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1996)
  • A.J. Farber et al.

    Clinical assessment of three common tests for traumatic anterior shoulder instability

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2006)
  • E.M. Fowler et al.

    Clinical and arthroscopic findings in recreationally active patients

    Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol

    (2010)
  • O.J. Gagey et al.

    The hyperabduction test

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (2001)
  • C. Gerber et al.

    Clinical assessment of instability of the shoulder. With special reference to anterior and posterior drawer tests

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1984)
  • M.L. Gross et al.

    Anterior release test. A new test for occult shoulder instability

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1997)
  • J.J. Halma et al.

    Interdisciplinary inter-observer agreement and accuracy of MR imaging of the shoulder with arthroscopic correlation

    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

    (2012)
  • F.E. Harrell et al.

    Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors

    Stat Med

    (1996)
  • E.J. Hegedus

    Which physical examination tests provide clinicians with the most value when examining the shoulder? Update of a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests

    Br J Sports Med

    (2012)
  • E.J. Hegedus et al.

    Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests

    Br J Sports Med

    (2007)
  • L. Hovelius et al.

    Nonoperative treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocation in patients forty years of age and younger. A prospective twenty-five-year follow-up

    J Bone Joint Surg

    (2008)
  • Cited by (52)

    • Remplissage for Anterior Shoulder Instability: History, Indications, and Outcomes

      2022, Orthopedic Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      The results are graded as 0, minimal displacement; 1, translation to glenoid rim; 2, translation over glenoid rim with spontaneous relocation; and 3, translation over glenoid rim without spontaneous relocation. The specificity has been found to be 90% to 100% and sensitivity up to 71%.33 The anterior drawer test is performed by shifting the humeral head anteriorly on the glenoid fossa and is considered positive if the patient experiences a sense instability with affected shoulder compared with the contralateral shoulder.

    • First-time anterior shoulder dislocation: Decision-making and surgical techniques

      2022, Surgical Techniques of the Shoulder, Elbow, and Knee in Sports Medicine, Third Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Received grants: European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and the Elbow (2009 SECEC/ESSSE Research Grant); Anna Foundation (2009 Research Grant), number: 09/078; Marti-Keuning Eckhardt Foundation (2009 Research Grant).

    Institutional review board (IRB): METC, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Ethical approval was obtained by the Ethics Committee.

    View full text