ResearchEvaluation of the Fast Track Unit of a University Emergency Department
Section snippets
FT areas, patient flow, and throughput times
Evidence exists that FT areas are a positive addition to busy emergency departments. Studies have shown significant decreases in wait times in the emergency department after the initiation of an NP-run FT area.2 Others have examined wait time in relation to presenting complaint and found that many of the ED patients had minor, nonemergent, or self-limiting problems that ideally would be suited for an FT setting. FT areas have been shown to increase ED flow, decrease wait time, and use resources
Protection of human subjects
Prior to data collection, Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of participants, identifying information was removed prior to aggregating medical record data for this study. Additionally, the satisfaction surveys were anonymous and data are reported in the aggregate. Because this study involved review of charts retrospectively, informed consent was not obtained from individual participants, with the exception of those who filled out
Demographic data
A total of 5995 patients were seen in the ED FT area from September 1, 2004, through February 28, 2005, and there were 9130 patient visits to the MC area from September 1, 2003, through February 28, 2004. The population of these patients included roughly equivalent numbers of females and males. The majority of the patients was classified as self-pay or had no insurance (67%). The ethnic distribution of the sample was diverse. Complete demographic data for the patient visits to the FT and MC
Discussion
We expected our turnaround times to improve dramatically with the opening of the FT unit, and this was not the case. This may have happened for many reasons. In the past, the emergency department has not met our benchmarking time goals; expecting one change in process to immediately change years of practice may not have been realistic. Also, all but one of the NPs in the unit were new hires and did not have previous ED experience. The new NPs may have needed time to adjust to the FT setting and
Limitations
This study is limited because it was conducted in the first 3 months the FT unit was open. Taking a snapshot of the FT gives a limited view point. Several process issues were being worked out that probably influenced the time in department and TIR numbers, adversely skewing the data. Follow-up study is needed to determine the current impact of the FT area in the emergency department. Collecting data over time would give a fuller, more descriptive picture of the department. Also, comparing the
Conclusions
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of a newly developed NP-staffed FT unit and to compare time data for the FT unit with the previously run MC area. The LOS data suggests the efficiency of the FT unit has room for improvement. However, the unit is effectively run in that the LWBS rate is low, the unscheduled return visits are kept to a minimum, and patients are highly satisfied with the care they receive. It will be helpful to collect data on an ongoing
Kathleen Nash is Assistant Professor, University of Texas Medical Branch School of Nursing, Galveston.
References (16)
- et al.
Using online and office change model to improve efficiency for fast-track patients in emergency department
Jt Comm J Qual Improv
(2000) - et al.
Societal savings by “fast-track” lowering acuity patients in an urban pediatric emergency department
Am J Emerg Med
(1997) - et al.
Provision of clinically based information improves patients' perceived length of stay and satisfaction with EP
Am J Emerg Med
(2002) - et al.
Patient satisfaction with physician assistants in an ED fast track
Am J Emerg Med
(2000) - et al.
Does reduced length of stay decrease the number of emergency department patients who leave without seeing a physician?
J Emerg Med
(1997) Changing the face of emergency medicine
Physician Executive
(2004)- et al.
The effect of separate stream for minor injuries on accident and emergency department waiting times
Emerg Med J
(2002) - et al.
Utilization of emergency services in a community hospital
Saudi Med J
(2001)
Cited by (53)
Models of care with advanced practice nurses in the emergency department: A scoping review
2023, International Journal of Nursing StudiesQuality Improvement: Implementing Nurse Standard Work in Emergency Department Fast-Track Area to Reduce Patient Length of Stay
2022, Journal of Emergency NursingEvaluation of advanced practice provider related return visits to a pediatric emergency department and their outcomes
2022, American Journal of Emergency MedicineThe Impact of Bed Traffic Control and Improved Flow Process on Throughput Measures in a Metropolitan Emergency Department
2020, Journal of Emergency NursingThe effect of vertical split-flow patient management on emergency department throughput and efficiency
2018, American Journal of Emergency MedicineThe Impact of a Flexible Care Area on Throughput Measures in an Academic Emergency Department
2015, Journal of Emergency Nursing
Kathleen Nash is Assistant Professor, University of Texas Medical Branch School of Nursing, Galveston.
Brian Zachariah is Medical Director, University of Texas Medical Branch School of Nursing, Galveston.
Jennifer Nitschmann, Gulf Coast Chapter, is Administrative Director, University of Texas Medical Branch School of Nursing, Galveston.
Benjamin Psencik is FNP Student, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
Earn Up to 9.5 CE Hours. See page 90.