Report
A gene signature of nonhealing venous ulcers: Potential diagnostic markers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.07.018Get rights and content

Background

Venous leg ulcers are responsible for more than half of all lower extremity ulcerations. Significant interest has been focused on understanding the physiologic basis on which patients fail to heal with standard therapy.

Objective

This study uses complementary DNA microarray analysis of tissue samples from healing and nonhealing venous leg ulcers to identify the genetic expression profiles from these dichotomous populations.

Methods

Ulcer size and chronicity, factors that have been identified as prognostic indicators for healing, were used to distribute venous leg ulcers as healing versus nonhealing. Punch biopsy samples were obtained from the wound edge and wound bed of all venous leg ulcers. The top 15 genes with differential expression greater than 2-fold between the two populations of wounds (P < .05) were reported.

Results

Significant differences were demonstrated in the expression of a diverse collection of genes, with particular differences demonstrated by genes coding for structural epidermal proteins, genes associated with hyperproliferation and tissue injury, and transcription factors.

Limitations

Small sample size may mitigate potential clinical implications of findings.

Conclusions

The genetic expression profiles displayed here may have implications for the development of novel therapies for chronic venous leg ulcers, and may also serve as prognostic indicators for wound healing.

Section snippets

Participants

Patients were recruited according to a protocol approved by the our institutional review board. Consent was obtained from all patients, and Declaration of Helsinki protocols were followed. In all, 5 patients with nonhealing and 5 patients with healing chronic venous leg ulcers as defined by previous prognostic models for wound healing in venous leg ulcers were studied.17, 18 All ulcers were present for at least 4 weeks. Healing venous leg ulcers were defined as ulcers that were less than 5 cm2

Gene expression profile of healing versus nonhealing epidermal wound edge

Table I, Table II demonstrate the top 15 genes that were differentially expressed between the two groups of venous leg ulcers from the keratinocytes of the tissue sampled at the nonhealing wound edge. The most striking finding in this data set is the extent to which genes implicated in epidermal hyperproliferation and tissue repair were differentially expressed. Of additional interest is that the down-regulation (>250.00) demonstrated in the nonhealing wound edges was much greater than the

Discussion

Optimal wound healing depends on the concerted interplay of thousands of genes. Of those identified to be differently expressed between these two groups of venous leg ulcers, several specific genes deserve special mention.

References (40)

  • R.L. Eckert et al.

    S100 proteins in the epidermis

    Invest Dermatol

    (2004)
  • X. Zheng et al.

    Aquaporin 3 colocates with phospholipase d2 in caveolin-rich membrane microdomains and is downregulated upon keratinocyte differentiation

    Invest Dermatol

    (2003)
  • M. Bongrazio et al.

    The endothelium as physiological source of properdin: role of wall shear stress

    Mol Immunol

    (2003)
  • U. Takeda et al.

    Targeted disruption of dermatopontin causes abnormal collagen fibrillogenesis

    J Invest Dermatol

    (2002)
  • K. Kuroda et al.

    Dermatopontin expression is decreased in hypertrophic scar and systemic sclerosis skin fibroblasts and is regulated by transforming growth factor-beta 1, interleukin-4, and matrix collagen

    J Invest Dermatol

    (1999)
  • R. Fassler et al.

    Differential regulation of fibulin, tenascin-C, and nidogen expression during wound healing of normal and glucocorticoid-treated mice

    Exp Cell Res

    (1996)
  • M. Detmar

    The role of VEGF and thrombospondins in skin angiogenesis

    J Dermatol Sci

    (2000)
  • I.C. Valencia et al.

    Chronic venous insufficiency and venous leg ulceration

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2001)
  • V. Falanga et al.

    Healing of venous ulcers and lack of clinical rejection with an allogeneic cultured human skin equivalent

    Arch Dermatol

    (1998)
  • T.J. Phillips

    Successful methods of treating venous ulcers: the tried and true, plus the novel and new

    Postgrad Med

    (1999)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Genesis, Pathophysiology and Management of Venous and Lymphatic Disorders

      2022, Genesis, Pathophysiology and Management of Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
    • Proteomic Profiling of Fibroblasts Isolated from Chronic Wounds Identifies Disease-Relevant Signaling Pathways

      2020, Journal of Investigative Dermatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      TGFβ is secreted as a latent molecule that needs to undergo enzymatic or mechanic activation (Hinz, 2015). Thrombospondin-1, a latent TGFβ activator (Murphy-Ullrich and Downs, 2015) that has been shown to be upregulated in chronic ulcers versus healing ulcers (Charles et al., 2008), was increased in cWAFs (Supplementary Figure S2). Collectively, the data indicate that the increased TGFβ activity in cWAFs is probably a result of dysregulation of multiple joint and complementary mechanisms.

    • The renaissance of human skin organ culture: A critical reappraisal

      2018, Differentiation
      Citation Excerpt :

      There remains a critical need for new therapeutics that promote wound healing in patients with chronic skin wounds. Again, hSOC is optimally suited for studying and manipulating key aspects of human skin wound healing ex vivo, most notably epidermal regeneration (reepithelialization), typically using a punch-in-punch design (Fig. 4) (Charles et al., 2008; Meier et al., 2013). In 2005, Stojadinovic et al. used wound skin organ culture to investigate the role of β-catenin and c-myc in the inhibition of epithelialization and wound healing (Stojadinovic et al., 2005).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the Department of Dermatology at the University of Miami and by the by National Institutes of Health grants NR008029 and AG030673, and a pilot award (UL1RR024996) from the Center for Translational Science Award of the Weill Cornell Medical College.

    Conflicts of interest: None declared.

    View full text