Investigating the association between antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance: impact of different methods of categorising prior antibiotic use

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.04.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Many studies have explored the association between antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance. However, methods employed in these studies to categorise prior antibiotic use (e.g. by class, by spectrum) have not been well described. The impact of using different categorisation methods on identifying risk factors for resistance is unknown. To explore these issues, we focused on extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. (ESBL-EK) as a model. First, we conducted a systematic review of studies of risk factors for ESBL-EK to characterise past approaches to categorising antibiotic use. Second, we re-analysed data from a prior study of risk factors for ESBL-EK. Two separate multivariate models of risk factors for ESBL-EK were constructed: one with prior antibiotic use categorised by class and the other with prior antibiotic use categorised by spectrum of activity. Among the 20 articles that met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, there was tremendous variability in how prior antibiotic use was categorised (e.g. by agent, class, spectrum and/or a combination of these). No study justified its choice of categorisation method. In the re-analysis of the existing data set, multivariate models of risk factors for ESBL-EK using ‘class’ and ‘spectrum’ categorisations differed substantially. In conclusion, there has been no consistent approach to categorising antibiotic use in studies of risk factors for ESBL-EK. Different categorisation schemes were shown to have a substantial impact on study results, particularly for the antibiotic exposures associated with resistance. Elucidating these issues is critical if effective strategies to curb resistance are to be designed.

Introduction

The continued emergence of antibiotic resistance is of great concern [1]. Many studies have focused on identifying risk factors for resistant infections to better inform effective strategies to counter their continued emergence [2], [3]. Prior antibiotic use has been identified as one of the most consistent and important modifiable risk factors associated with resistance [4], [5]. However, whilst numerous studies have explored the association between antibiotic use and resistance, the methods by which past studies have categorised prior antibiotic use have not been critically reviewed. For example, antibiotic use could be classified by agent (e.g. cefazolin), class (e.g. cephalosporins) or spectrum of activity (e.g. Gram-negative). Antibiotics are frequently grouped together in classes even though individual agents within the class may differ significantly [6] and such categorisations may mask important associations. It is unknown whether using different categorisation schemes results in different conclusions regarding the association between antibiotic use and resistance. To best identify possible targets for intervention, it is critical to distinguish whether a resistant pathogen is associated with use of a specific class of antibiotics versus use of agents with a common spectrum of activity.

Using the emergence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. (ESBL-EK) as a model, this study had two primary aims: (1) to describe the variability in the medical literature with regard to categorising antibiotic use in studies of risk factors for resistance; and (2) to determine the impact of using different antibiotic categorisation schemes on identifying possible antimicrobial use targets for intervention.

Section snippets

Methods

To explore the variability and possible impact of antibiotic categorisation methods on the association between prior antibiotic use and ESBL-EK infections, we conducted two studies. First, we performed a systematic review of the existing literature investigating the association between prior antibiotic use and ESBL-EK. In this systematic review we focused specifically on elucidating published approaches for categorisation of prior antibiotic use. Second, using a previously published study

Systematic review

Twenty articles investigating risk factors for ESBL-EK fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review (Table 2) [7], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. Fifteen focused on adult populations, four included only children and one included patients of all ages. Of the 20 studies, 4 employed a cohort design whilst 16 were case–control studies.

There was tremendous variability across studies in the approach to

Discussion

In recent years, increased attention has been focused on methodological issues in epidemiological studies of antibiotic resistance [32], [33], [34]. The goal of such work is to promote increasingly rigorous investigations to elucidate more clearly the epidemiology of resistance. In particular, identifying modifiable risk factors is paramount in efforts to curb the further emergence of resistance. To this end, the current study is, to our knowledge, the first to investigate the impact of

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Public Health Service grant DK-02987-01 of the National Institutes of Health (Dr Lautenbach). This study was also supported in part by an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics co-operative agreement (U18-HS10399). The authors thank Brian L. Strom, MD, MPH, for his invaluable advice during the preparation of this manuscript. Dr Lautenbach had full access to all the data in the study and takes

References (40)

  • N. Safdar et al.

    The commonality of risk factors for nosocomial colonization and infection with antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus, gram-negative bacilli, Clostridium difficile, and Candida

    Ann Intern Med

    (2002)
  • C.J. Donskey

    The role of the intestinal tract as a reservoir and source for transmission of nosocomial pathogens

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • E. Lautenbach et al.

    Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors for infection and impact of resistance on outcomes

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2001)
  • D.N. Gilbert et al.

    The Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy

    (2004)
  • A. Kucers et al.

    The use of antibiotics: a clinical review of antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral drugs

    (1997)
  • G.L. Mandell et al.

    Principles and practice of infectious diseases

    (2004)
  • R.M. Mickey et al.

    The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1989)
  • T.E. Zaoutis et al.

    Risk factors for and outcomes of bloodstream infection caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species in children

    Pediatrics

    (2005)
  • D.L. Paterson et al.

    International prospective study of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: implications of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in nosocomial infections

    Ann Intern Med

    (2004)
  • R. Colodner et al.

    Risk factors for the development of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria in nonhospitalized patients

    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Use of evidence-based recommendations in an antibiotic care bundle for the intensive care unit

      2018, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
      Citation Excerpt :

      Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have shown a significant association between previous antibiotic administration and isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [1], vancomycin-resistant enterococci [2,3] and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria [4].

    • Risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance in Gram-negative bacilli causing healthcare-acquired urinary tract infections

      2010, Journal of Hospital Infection
      Citation Excerpt :

      Data obtained included age, sex, race, hospital service (department), hospital location, number of hospital days both before and after the diagnosis of UTI, comorbid conditions, presence of a urinary catheter and use of inpatient antimicrobial therapy in the preceding 30 days. We categorised antimicrobial use by the individual agent and also by the class, as follows: (1) aminoglycosides; (2) β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitors; (3) carbapenems; (4) cephalosporins; (5) fluoroquinolones; (6) penicillins; (7) macrolides; (8) others (clindamycin, doxycycline, metronidazole, nitrofurantoin, linezolid, cotrimoxazole and vancomycin).20,21 Categorical variables were expressed as proportions whereas continuous variables were expressed in terms of mean (±SD) or median (range) depending on the sample distribution.

    • Clinical and economic outcomes of decreased fluconazole susceptibility in patients with Candida glabrata bloodstream infections

      2010, American Journal of Infection Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      Data were primarily collected from the Pennsylvania Integrated Clinical and Administrative Research Database (PICARD). PICARD integrates administrative and clinical information (eg, demographics, diagnoses, pharmacy information, hospital charges) for both inpatient and outpatient activity occurring within the University of Pennsylvania Health System and has been used successfully in prior studies focusing on antimicrobial resistance.15,16 The primary outcomes were 30-day inpatient mortality and postculture hospital charges accrued from the date of the first positive blood culture until patient discharge or death.

    • Risk factors for fluconazole resistance in patients with Candida glabrata bloodstream infection: Potential impact of control group selection on characterizing the association between previous fluconazole use and fluconazole resistance

      2010, American Journal of Infection Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      The following patient information was collected: demographic information (ie, age, sex, and race), hospitalization characteristics (ie, hospital and time at risk [time from hospital admission to the first positive blood culture]), comorbidities (ie, human immunodeficiency virus infection, malignancy, diabetes, neutropenia, solid organ transplantation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, cirrhosis, and end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis), and events occurring 30 days before the positive C glabrata blood culture, including receipt of total parenteral nutrition, chemotherapy, immunosuppression, and/or antimicrobial agents, and intensive care unit stay (collected as binomial variables). Antimicrobial agents evaluated included fluconazole, voriconazole, caspofungin, amphotericin, penicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam, nafcillin, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefazolin, cephalexin, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, aztreonam, gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, kanamycin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, doxycycline, azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, linezolid, metronidazole, quinupristin/dalfopristin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin.14 Demographic and patient health information of cases and controls were compared in bivariate analyses using the χ2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Student t test or Wilcoxon's rank-sum test for continuous variables.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text