Postural visual dependence after recent stroke: Assessment by optokinetic stimulation
Section snippets
Subjects
Twenty-five patients and 25 healthy subjects were enrolled. When questioned, all of them said they were right handed.
The patients included had recently experienced their first and only cerebral hemispheric stroke, resulting in at least initial motor and balance impairment. They were examined 1–3 days after admission to our Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, immediately after the acute stage in the neurological vascular unit. The patients included had to be able to remain sitting
Spontaneous position
Spontaneous projection of the CoP was slightly left deviated (−6.8 ± 7.35 mm). In the patients, the same left tilt projection of the CoP was observed. The degree of stability, as measured by the length of CoP’ projection was 111 ± 29, with a large range, from 82 to 166.
Reactions under OKS
Displacement of the CoP under OKS ranged from 0 to 12.5 mm on the frontal axis. The mean absolute value was 3.0 ± 3.1 mm under rightward rotation and 2.7 ± 2.8 mm under leftward rotation. Different types of behaviour were observed, over 0.5
Discussion
This study was conducted with the aim of describing the postural reactions to optokinetic stimulation of hemiplegic patients after a recent stroke. In this way, we set out to describe different kinds of reactions to the stimulation and to define visual dependence as the body tilt induced by optokinetic stimulation.
In a previous study, chronic post-stroke hemiplegic patients were shown to exhibit a visual dependence behaviour in relation to standing postural control [1]. A specific
Conclusion
The procedure proposed in this study allows assessment of the visual dependence of posture early after stroke. The fact that under optokinetic stimulation visual dependence is not, or not only, the consequence of neurological impairments, argues in favour of the existence of a constitutional behaviour present before the stroke. Early examination after stroke with our procedure allows the detection of such visual dependence or independence, before rehabilitation can induce a new visual
References (29)
- et al.
Reliance on visual information after stroke. Part I: Balance on dynamic posturography
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2004) - et al.
How dynamic visual field dependence-independence interacts with the visual contribution to postural control
Hum Mov Sci
(1998) - et al.
Visual contribution to self-induced body sway frequencies and visual perception of male professional dancers
Neurosci Lett
(1999) - et al.
Reliance on visual information after stroke. Part II: Effectiveness of a balance rehabilitation programme with visual cue deprivation after stroke: a randomised controlled trial
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2004) - et al.
Biased postural vertical in humans with hemispheric cerebral lesions
Neurosci Lett
(1998) - et al.
Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation reduces neglect-related postural instability after stroke
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2001) - et al.
Increased visual dependence in Parkinson's disease
Percept Mot Skills
(2002) - et al.
Visual vertigo: symptom assessment, spatial orientation and postural control
Brain
(2001) - et al.
Assessment of the risk of fall, related to visual stimulation, in patients with central vestibular disorders
Acta Otolaryngol
(2001) - et al.
Postural adjustments produced by moving visual (horizontal optokinetic) patterns
J Am Acad Audio
(1996)
Visual perception dominance of fallers among community-dwelling older adults
J Am Geriatr Soc
Visual field dependence in elderly fallers and non-fallers
Int J Aging Hum Dev
Postural sensitivity to visual flow in aging adults with and without balance problems
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
Changes in sensory organization test scores with age
Age Ageing
Cited by (38)
The association between visuospatial neglect and balance and mobility post-stroke onset: A systematic review
2021, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineCitation Excerpt :With regard to the mediolateral direction, 2 studies of moderate methodological quality found no significant association between VSN and mediolateral CoP excursions [29,44] or velocities [44], whereas one study of good methodological quality found a significant association for mediolateral CoP excursions [57]. Yelnik et al. [25] investigated sitting balance under optokinetic stimulation (OKS) and showed that VSN was unrelated to body tilt under OKS, but it was positively related to the stabilization reaction (i.e., ratio for total length of CoP displacement under OKS). In summary, although consensus was reached on an absent association in the anteroposterior direction, the association between CoP excursions in the mediolateral direction and VSN is still uncertain.
The iFST: An instrumented version of the Fukuda Stepping Test for balance assessment
2018, Gait and PostureRod and frame test and posture under optokinetic stimulation used to explore two complementary aspects of the visual influence in postural control after stroke
2017, Gait and PostureCitation Excerpt :VS OKS implies 4 different types of behaviour [13]: 1) visual independence, absence of tilt with no loss of stability; 2) VS, marked tilt with no stabilization reaction; 3) partial VS, body tilt despite an increased stabilization reaction; and 4) compensated VS, absence of body tilt but a marked increase in the stabilization reaction. After leftward and rightward OKS, patients were classified into 2 groups [13]: 1) visual insensitive with OKS (VS OKS-), total VI with OKS regardless of the direction or mixed reaction (visual independence in one direction and VS in the other direction) and others with various VS reactions; and 2) visual sensitive with OKS (VS OKS + ), total VS with OKS regardless of the direction. Data distribution was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
The effect of optokinetic and galvanic vestibular stimulations in reducing post-stroke postural asymmetry
2016, Clinical NeurophysiologyCitation Excerpt :In this study, we observed that the corrective effect was 1.6 times higher with Okn than with Gv, however, the quantitative smaller beneficial effect of Gv compared to Okn is probably due to the intensity of the stimulation which was arbitrarily chosen and based on our previous studies. In these studies, we used Gv and Okn stimulation in a different context (Bonan et al., 2013; Yelnik et al., 2006) as we manipulated sensory information through multidirectional Okn and Gv stimulation in order to test the response of stroke patients to sensory information and to study sensory dependence (Bonan et al., 2013; Yelnik et al., 2006). Interestingly we observed that some patients were stabilised by Okn stimulation (Yelnik et al., 2006) and that Okn or Gv lateral stimulation usually induced a corrective lateral displacement of the CP (Bonan et al., 2013).