Improved quality of life after long-term treatment with the bisphosphonate ibandronate in patients with metastatic bone disease due to breast cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.03.025Get rights and content

Abstract

Bone metastases occur in most women with advanced breast cancer and can lead to considerable morbidity and a rapid deterioration in the patient's quality of life. It was the aim of the present study to assess changes in quality of life and bone pain due to intravenous (i.v.) ibandronate, a potent third-generation bisphosphonate. In a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with bone metastases due to breast cancer, 466 women were randomised to receive placebo, 2 mg ibandronate or 6 mg ibandronate for up to 96 weeks. Treatment was administered i.v. at 3- or 4-weekly intervals. Clinical endpoints included the incidence of adverse events, quality of life (assessed using the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Scale – Core 30 questionnaire (QLQ-C30)), and bone pain (assessed on a 5-point scale from 0=none to 4=intolerable). Ibandronate was generally well tolerated. Compared with baseline measurements, the bone pain score was increased at the last assessment in both the placebo and 2 mg ibandronate groups, but was significantly reduced in the patients receiving 6 mg ibandronate (−0.28 ± 1.11, P<0.001). A significant improvement in quality of life was demonstrated for patients treated with ibandronate (P<0.05) for all global health status. Overall, at the last assessment, the 6 mg ibandronate group showed significantly better functioning compared with placebo (P=0.004), and had significantly better scores on the domains of physical, emotional, and social functioning, and in global health status (P<0.05). Significant improvements in the symptoms of fatigue and pain were also observed in the 6 mg ibandronate group. I.v. ibandronate treatment leads to significant improvements in quality of life, and is an effective and well-tolerated palliative treatment in patients with bone metastases due to breast cancer.

Introduction

Bone metastases occur in up to 80% of women with advanced breast cancer [1], [2]. This leads to major skeletal complications including bone pain, fractures and hypercalcaemia. Combined, these manifestations can cause significant morbidity and deterioration in the patient's quality of life. The management of the secondary complications of metastatic breast cancer is therefore important from patient welfare and societal care perspectives [3], [4], [5].

Treatment options in metastatic bone disease can be divided into local (irradiation and surgery) or systemic (hormone therapy, chemotherapy and bisphosphonates) treatments. The primary goal of antiosteolytic treatment with bisphosphonates is the reduction of skeletal-related complications such as hypercalcaemia, pathological fractures and spinal cord compression [6]. These effects are mainly achieved by the osteoclast-inhibiting property of bisphosphonates, and possibly by a direct anti-tumour action. Bisphosphonates are a class of pyrophosphate analogues characterised by a central PCP backbone. Bisphosphonates bind strongly on bone surface, particularly in zones with activated turnover. Incorporated into osteoclasts (or other cells), bisphosphonates may induce apoptotic or necrotic cell death [7], [8].

Oral (p.o.) (e.g. clodronate) and intravenous (i.v.) (e.g. pamidronate) bisphosphonates are currently the standard treatment for metastatic bone disease due to breast cancer. Bisphosphonates are known to delay skeletal-related events and improve bone pain, and may also be expected to improve overall quality of life [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. However, there is limited data on this latter point as few studies have directly measured the effects of bisphosphonate treatment on quality of life. Furthermore, previous studies that incorporated these measurements, have generally failed to show a direct correlation between reduction in skeletal events and improved quality of life [11], [13]. Therefore, to improve overall quality of life in patients with metastatic bone disease, additional issues may be important. These could include improvement of other disease symptoms, overall functioning, and ease of therapy administration.

Ibandronate is a potent, third-generation bisphosphonate that is effective in the treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy [14], [15], [16]. Ibandronate has also been evaluated in patients with metastatic bone disease due to breast cancer. A phase II dose-finding study indicated that i.v. doses of 2 and 6 mg, once every 4 weeks, were effective and sufficiently well tolerated for further evaluation [15], [17]. A subsequent phase III study was initiated to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of i.v. ibandronate administered at 2 and 6 mg, once every 3 or 4 weeks, for at least 60 weeks. Primary efficacy results from this study have recently been reported [18]. Treatment with 6 mg ibandronate was associated with significant clinical benefits. In addition to reducing the rate of skeletal complications, the 6 mg dose extended the time to the first skeletal event by more than 4 months.

Since reducing the incidence of skeletal events and minimising bone pain would be expected to lower disease burden, we report secondary efficacy results from the phase III study to assess the effect of ibandronate on the patient's quality of life.

Section snippets

Study design

This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, phase III study. Patients were enrolled at 75 centres in Europe, Kuwait, Russia, South Africa and the United States.

Patients

Patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer and bone metastases, confirmed by X-ray and/or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging, with World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status ⩽2 and aged ⩾18 years, were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they had a life expectancy <60

Patient demographics

A total of 469 patients with bone metastases as a result of histologically confirmed breast cancer were enrolled, 466 of whom received trial medication and comprised the ITT population (158 patients received placebo, 154 received 2 mg ibandronate, 154 patients received 6 mg ibandronate). Although patients were limited to a maximum of 24 treatments, 4 patients in the placebo group, 9 patients in the 2 mg group and 6 patients in the 6 mg group received 25 treatments.

The mean age of the patients

Discussion

Our data show that overall quality of life, as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scale, showed significantly less deterioration in patients treated with 6 mg ibandronate compared with placebo. The 2 mg dose was less effective than 6 mg ibandronate, but did improve some aspects of quality of life relative to placebo. Furthermore, ibandronate treatment improved all aspects of functioning as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scale. Significant improvements were observed in

Conflict of Interest statement

The clinical trial and data analysis were conducted by Roche, the manufacturers of ibandronate. All authors (except M. Budde and B. Bergström from Roche clinical) were principal investigators in the trial. The authors would like to thank Thomson Gardiner-Caldwell US for their editorial support.

Acknowledgements

The following principal investigators participated in this study: J.J. Body, Bruxelles, Belgium; S. Van Belle, Gent, Belgium; J.S. de Gréve, Bruxelles, Belgium; F. Cavalli, Bellinzona, Switzerland; B. Thuerlimann, St. Gallen, Switzerland; R. Herrmann, Basel, Switzerland; M. Clemens, Tuebingen, Germany; I.J. Diel, Heidelberg, Germany; W. Eiermann, Muenchen, Germany; G. Kaiser, Nuernberg, Germany; P. Nauen, Herne, Germany; R. Obenaus, Berlin, Germany; A.E. Schindler, Essen, Germany; E.D. Kreuser,

References (24)

  • A.H.G Paterson et al.

    Double-blind controlled trial of oral clodronate in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (1993)
  • A.T.M Van Holten-Verzantvoort et al.

    Palliative pamidronate treatment in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (1993)
  • Cited by (141)

    • Bone-targeted agents and skeletal-related events in breast cancer patients with bone metastases

      2021, Bone Cancer: Bone Sarcomas and Bone Metastases - From Bench to Bedside
    • Orthoses for Osteoporosis

      2018, Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices, Fifth Edition
    • Developing drugs in cancer-related bone pain

      2017, Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
    • Improving quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: Targeting metastatic bone pain

      2017, European Journal of Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of the 109 patients participating in the US expanded access programme and not receiving opioids at baseline, 42% achieved meaningful pain relief with radium-223 (28% had worse pain and 18% experienced no change) [79]. In metastatic cancers, the efficacy of bisphosphonates for reducing BPI scores, pain symptoms, analgesic use and radiation to bone has been well demonstrated (Table 3) [15,17,80–93]. Pamidronate may also delay time to pain progression [83] and clodronate may delay time to first regular use of analgesics [92].

    • Fracture pain-Traveling unknown pathways

      2016, Bone
      Citation Excerpt :

      Bisphosphonates, a class of drugs primarily used to prevent bone mass loss, have been suggested as a therapeutic option for bone pain. Bisphosphonates were shown to effectively reduce pain in disorders associated with increased bone turnover, such as metastatic bone diseases and osteoporosis [149–152]. Importantly, these drugs reduce osteoclastic activity [reviewed by 153].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text