Age Trajectories of Grip Strength: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data Among 8,342 Danes Aged 46 to 102
Introduction
Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies showed that muscle strength in adults declines with increasing age among both men and women 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Hand-grip strength is an estimate of isometric strength in the upper extremity, but also correlates with strength in other muscle groups (9) and therefore has been taken as an estimate of “overall strength.” Measurement of grip strength therefore has been included in many aging studies. Also, grip strength has proved to be a strong predictor of phenotypes of special interest among the elderly, e.g., physical functioning and disability 10, 11, 12, morbidity 1, 13, and mortality 14, 15, 16, 17. The instrument to measure grip strength, the handheld dynamometer, is inexpensive, easily portable, simple and quick to use, and thus feasible in home-based settings, which is crucial for response rates in studies of the elderly. Because the test does not necessarily require that participants stand up, grip strength can be determined for the elderly with impairments in lower-extremity functioning. Although affected by the physical and cognitive state of the elderly, the possibility of participating in this performance measure is not inherently limited to better-functioning individuals; therefore, it has been used with high participation rates, even among nonagenarians (10). Furthermore, because no ceiling effect has been observed among the younger and/or predisabled elderly, it also can be used for discriminating function among the middle aged (18).
In cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, grip strength has been reported to decline from approximately 30 years of age 3, 8. Based mostly on cross-sectional studies, mean annual loss in grip strength among healthy people from age 30 to 70 years has been estimated to be 0.5% to 1% of the strength at 30 years of age (19). From cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, the course of the decline was reported to accelerate with increasing age 1, 3, 4, 5. However, the annual loss may be underestimated in these studies because no attempt was made to take into account the problem of selective dropout caused by mortality and morbidity that is an inherent problem in aging studies. Furthermore, these studies included only a few participants aged 85 years and older, and two studies included only males 1, 5. In the present study, we describe the course of decline in grip strength from age 45 by using cross-sectional data from three large nationwide surveys of middle-aged, elderly, and oldest-old individuals, as well as 2- and 4-year follow-up data among the elderly and oldest old. Results can be used for studying differences in health and functioning of the elderly across regions and countries, as well as background data if grip-strength measurement is adopted as a routine measure in clinical assessment of the elderly.
Section snippets
Study Population
The sample was composed of participants in three nationwide population-based surveys: the Study of Middle-Aged Danish Twins (MADT) (18); the Longitudinal Study of Aging Danish Twins (LSADT), waves 3 (1999), 4 (2001), and 5 (2003) (20); and the Danish 1905 Cohort Study waves 1 (1998), 2 (2000), and 3 (2003) (21), which have been described in detail previously. In brief, participants in the MADT and LSADT were identified in The Danish Twin Register (22), and participants in the 1905 Cohort Study
Results
Grip strength varied according to age and sex, as expected, i.e., men were stronger than women and strength declined with increasing age (Figure 3). From age 70 onward, 2- and 4-year longitudinal data are included in the figure. Curves show an almost linear course of the decline, with a leveling-off tendency among the oldest women. At baseline, grip strength also varied according to response profile in the successive waves. This is shown by using unadjusted data from the 1905 cohort study in
Discussion
This study used data from three large nationwide population-based surveys of Danes aged 45 to 102 years, with a total of 8342 participants with grip-strength measurements and up to four years of follow-up. It shows that grip strength declines throughout life for both males and females, but among the oldest women, the curve reaches a horizontal plateau. The course of the decline was found to be almost linear in the age span of 50 to 85 years. Analysis of grip-strength longitudinal data was
References (44)
- et al.
Disability, physical activity, and muscle strength in older women: The Women's Health and Aging Study
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1999) - et al.
Physical-strength tests and mortality among visitors to health-promotion centers in Japan
J Clin Epidemiol
(1995) Elbow positioning for maximum grip performance
J Hand Ther
(2000)- et al.
Handgrip strength and insulin levels: Cross-sectional and prospective associations in the Normative Aging Study
Metabolism
(1997) - et al.
Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: A systematic literature review
Soc Sci Med
(1999) - et al.
Manual ability as a marker of dependency in geriatric women
J Chronic Dis
(1982) - et al.
Grip strength changes over 27 yr in Japanese-American men
J Appl Physiol
(1998) - et al.
Physical activity and the changes in maximal isometric strength in men and women from the age of 75 to 80 years
J Am Geriatr Soc
(1997) - et al.
The role of muscle loss in the age-related decline of grip strength: Cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives
J Gerontol
(1990) - et al.
Age-associated loss of power and strength in the upper extremities in women and men
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
(1997)
Normal values for handgrip strength in 920 men and women aged over 65 years, and longitudinal changes over 4 years in 620 survivors
Clin Sci (Lond)
Muscle strength and speed of movement in relation to age and muscle morphology
J Appl Physiol
Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
Grip and arm strength in males and females, age 10 to 69
Res Q
Maximal isometric muscle strength and socioeconomic status, health, and physical activity in 75-year-old persons
J Aging Phys Activity
Functional status and self-rated health in 2,262 nonagenarians: The Danish 1905 Cohort Survey
J Am Geriatr Soc
Maximal isometric strength and mobility among 75-year-old men and women
Age Ageing
Falls by elderly people at home: Prevalence and associated factors
Age Ageing
Muscle strength and body mass index as long-term predictors of mortality in initially healthy men
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
Handgrip strength and mortality in older Mexican Americans
J Am Geriatr Soc
Grip strength, mental performance and nutritional status as indicators of mortality risk among female geriatric patients
Age Ageing
Strength and anthropometric measures in identical and fraternal twins: No evidence of masculinization of females with male co-twins
Epidemiology
Cited by (0)
Supported by US National Institute on Aging research grant NIA-PO1-AG08761 and the Danish National Research Foundation.
K.C. initiated the surveys with J.W.V. and M.M.; K.C. and H.F. were responsible for conducting major parts of the surveys; H.F., J.H., and J.M. analyzed the results; H.F. and J.H. wrote the first draft; and all authors contributed to writing the report and interpretation of data.