Age Trajectories of Grip Strength: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data Among 8,342 Danes Aged 46 to 102

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.10.006Get rights and content

Purpose

The purpose is to study the age trajectory of hand-grip strength after the age of 45 years.

Methods

In this study, we use data from three large nationwide population-based surveys of Danes aged 45 to 102 years with a total of 8342 participants with grip-strength measurements and up to 4 years of follow-up. Grip strength was measured by using a portable hand dynamometer.

Results

Grip strength declines throughout life for both males and females, but among the oldest women, the longitudinal curve reaches a horizontal plateau. The course of the decline is estimated by using full information in the longitudinal data and is found to be almost linear in the age span of 50 to 85 years. In this age span, mean annual grip-strength loss is estimated to be 0.59 (0.02) (SE) kg for men and 0.31 (0.01) kg for women.

Conclusion

This study confirms the previously reported grip-strength decline with increasing age. Estimates were obtained by using full-information methods from large population-representative studies. Equations of expected grip strength, as well as tables with sex-, age-, and height-stratified reference data, provide an opportunity to include grip-strength measurement in clinical care in similar populations.

Introduction

Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies showed that muscle strength in adults declines with increasing age among both men and women 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Hand-grip strength is an estimate of isometric strength in the upper extremity, but also correlates with strength in other muscle groups (9) and therefore has been taken as an estimate of “overall strength.” Measurement of grip strength therefore has been included in many aging studies. Also, grip strength has proved to be a strong predictor of phenotypes of special interest among the elderly, e.g., physical functioning and disability 10, 11, 12, morbidity 1, 13, and mortality 14, 15, 16, 17. The instrument to measure grip strength, the handheld dynamometer, is inexpensive, easily portable, simple and quick to use, and thus feasible in home-based settings, which is crucial for response rates in studies of the elderly. Because the test does not necessarily require that participants stand up, grip strength can be determined for the elderly with impairments in lower-extremity functioning. Although affected by the physical and cognitive state of the elderly, the possibility of participating in this performance measure is not inherently limited to better-functioning individuals; therefore, it has been used with high participation rates, even among nonagenarians (10). Furthermore, because no ceiling effect has been observed among the younger and/or predisabled elderly, it also can be used for discriminating function among the middle aged (18).

In cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, grip strength has been reported to decline from approximately 30 years of age 3, 8. Based mostly on cross-sectional studies, mean annual loss in grip strength among healthy people from age 30 to 70 years has been estimated to be 0.5% to 1% of the strength at 30 years of age (19). From cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, the course of the decline was reported to accelerate with increasing age 1, 3, 4, 5. However, the annual loss may be underestimated in these studies because no attempt was made to take into account the problem of selective dropout caused by mortality and morbidity that is an inherent problem in aging studies. Furthermore, these studies included only a few participants aged 85 years and older, and two studies included only males 1, 5. In the present study, we describe the course of decline in grip strength from age 45 by using cross-sectional data from three large nationwide surveys of middle-aged, elderly, and oldest-old individuals, as well as 2- and 4-year follow-up data among the elderly and oldest old. Results can be used for studying differences in health and functioning of the elderly across regions and countries, as well as background data if grip-strength measurement is adopted as a routine measure in clinical assessment of the elderly.

Section snippets

Study Population

The sample was composed of participants in three nationwide population-based surveys: the Study of Middle-Aged Danish Twins (MADT) (18); the Longitudinal Study of Aging Danish Twins (LSADT), waves 3 (1999), 4 (2001), and 5 (2003) (20); and the Danish 1905 Cohort Study waves 1 (1998), 2 (2000), and 3 (2003) (21), which have been described in detail previously. In brief, participants in the MADT and LSADT were identified in The Danish Twin Register (22), and participants in the 1905 Cohort Study

Results

Grip strength varied according to age and sex, as expected, i.e., men were stronger than women and strength declined with increasing age (Figure 3). From age 70 onward, 2- and 4-year longitudinal data are included in the figure. Curves show an almost linear course of the decline, with a leveling-off tendency among the oldest women. At baseline, grip strength also varied according to response profile in the successive waves. This is shown by using unadjusted data from the 1905 cohort study in

Discussion

This study used data from three large nationwide population-based surveys of Danes aged 45 to 102 years, with a total of 8342 participants with grip-strength measurements and up to four years of follow-up. It shows that grip strength declines throughout life for both males and females, but among the oldest women, the curve reaches a horizontal plateau. The course of the decline was found to be almost linear in the age span of 50 to 85 years. Analysis of grip-strength longitudinal data was

References (44)

  • E.J. Bassey et al.

    Normal values for handgrip strength in 920 men and women aged over 65 years, and longitudinal changes over 4 years in 620 survivors

    Clin Sci (Lond)

    (1993)
  • L. Larsson et al.

    Muscle strength and speed of movement in relation to age and muscle morphology

    J Appl Physiol

    (1979)
  • V. Mathiowetz et al.

    Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1985)
  • H.J. Montoye et al.

    Grip and arm strength in males and females, age 10 to 69

    Res Q

    (1977)
  • T. Rantanen et al.

    Maximal isometric muscle strength and socioeconomic status, health, and physical activity in 75-year-old persons

    J Aging Phys Activity

    (1994)
  • H. Nybo et al.

    Functional status and self-rated health in 2,262 nonagenarians: The Danish 1905 Cohort Survey

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2001)
  • T. Rantanen et al.

    Maximal isometric strength and mobility among 75-year-old men and women

    Age Ageing

    (1994)
  • A.J. Blake et al.

    Falls by elderly people at home: Prevalence and associated factors

    Age Ageing

    (1988)
  • T. Rantanen et al.

    Muscle strength and body mass index as long-term predictors of mortality in initially healthy men

    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci

    (2000)
  • S. Al Snih et al.

    Handgrip strength and mortality in older Mexican Americans

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2002)
  • P. Phillips

    Grip strength, mental performance and nutritional status as indicators of mortality risk among female geriatric patients

    Age Ageing

    (1986)
  • D. Gaist et al.

    Strength and anthropometric measures in identical and fraternal twins: No evidence of masculinization of females with male co-twins

    Epidemiology

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    Supported by US National Institute on Aging research grant NIA-PO1-AG08761 and the Danish National Research Foundation.

    K.C. initiated the surveys with J.W.V. and M.M.; K.C. and H.F. were responsible for conducting major parts of the surveys; H.F., J.H., and J.M. analyzed the results; H.F. and J.H. wrote the first draft; and all authors contributed to writing the report and interpretation of data.

    View full text