Presentation
Side effects of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen: the patients’ perspective

Presented at the 7th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons, Baltimore, Maryland, April 5–9, 2006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Hormonal therapy is a mainstay in the management of estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer. Tamoxifen (TAM) has been the drug widely used until the recent emergence of the aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Although AIs appear to be better tolerated than tamoxifen, they do have a different safety profile and these side effects have not been well characterized in community practice. We surveyed patients with ER+ breast cancers who received adjuvant hormonal therapy to determine how these medications impacted their quality of life and whether side effects or cost influenced decisions to continue therapy.

Methods

A mailed questionnaire and community cancer registry were used.

Results

Four hundred fifty-two of 902 surveys were returned for a 50% response rate. Eighty-two percent of respondents were placed on (adjuvant hormonal therapy) some form of estrogen-blocking therapy. Fifty-four percent of these were placed on tamoxifen and 46% on an AI. The most troublesome symptoms for tamoxifen and AI users, respectively, included hot flashes (35%/30%), weight gain (14%/15%), insomnia (17%/17%), and joint aches (12%/23%, P = .002). Thirty-nine percent of TAM users and 46% of AI users were taking medications to control their symptoms. Fifty percent of TAM users and 39% of AI users took vitamin E to help control hot flashes. Forty-two percent of TAM users versus 32% of AI users took Advil (Wyeth, Richmond, VA) for muscle/joint aches; 47.5% of AI users switched medication to improve symptoms as compared with only 37% of tamoxifen users (P = .015). The average cost of medications to control side effects for both tamoxifen and AI users was $67.36 per month.

Conclusions

In our survey, both tamoxifen and AI users reported significant and different side effects. AI users suffered more frequently from musculoskeletal complaints, and more AI users switched therapy. Both AI and tamoxifen users used adjunctive medications for symptom control. In both groups, a large number used vitamin E to help hot flashes despite weak evidence to support its effectiveness in this setting. Cost of therapy and symptom control was not a major barrier to care.

References (9)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (125)

  • Aromatase

    2023, Metalloenzymes: From Bench to Bedside
  • Letrozole treatment alters hippocampal gene expression in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)

    2023, Hormones and Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    While AIs are the standard for hormone based adjuvant therapies, they are accompanied by several manifestations of central nervous system (CNS) deficits such as cognitive impairment, insomnia, and hot flashes. These side effects can be severe enough to deter patients from continuing this life-saving treatment (Garreau et al., 2006). Understanding the mechanisms by which AIs induce CNS deficits is critical to finding improved alternatives.

  • Aromatase inhibitor use, side effects and discontinuation rates in gynecologic oncology patients

    2020, Gynecologic Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite the potential clinical efficacy of AIs, their use is associated with a risk of side effects that can be debilitating. These side effects can be broad and diverse, including musculoskeletal symptoms, hot flashes and insomnia [9–12]. The constellation of musculoskeletal symptoms associated with AI therapy has been termed aromatase inhibitor musculoskeletal syndrome (AIMSS) or aromatase inhibitor-related arthralgias (AIA) [13].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text