Guide to community preventive service
Effectiveness of Policies Maintaining or Restricting Days of Alcohol Sales on Excessive Alcohol Consumption and Related Harms

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Local, state, and national laws and policies that limit the days of the week on which alcoholic beverages may be sold may be a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. The methods of the Guide to Community Preventive Services were used to synthesize scientific evidence on the effectiveness for preventing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms of laws and policies maintaining or reducing the days when alcoholic beverages may be sold. Outcomes assessed in 14 studies that met qualifying criteria were excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms, including motor vehicle injuries and deaths, violence-related and other injuries, and health conditions.

Qualifying studies assessed the effects of changes in days of sale in both on-premises settings (at which alcoholic beverages are consumed where purchased) and off-premises settings (at which alcoholic beverages may not be consumed where purchased). Eleven studies assessed the effects of adding days of sale, and three studies assessed the effects of imposing a ban on sales on a given weekend day. The evidence from these studies indicated that increasing days of sale leads to increases in excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms and that reducing the number of days that alcoholic beverages are sold generally decreases alcohol-related harms. Based on these findings, when the expansion of days of sale is being considered, laws and policies maintaining the number of days of the week that alcoholic beverages are sold at on- and off-premises outlets in local, state, and national jurisdictions are effective public health strategies for preventing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms.

Introduction

Excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S. is responsible for approximately 79,000 deaths per year, making it the third-leading cause of preventable death.1 Approximately 15% of U.S. adults aged ≥18 years and approximately 29% of high school students in the U.S. report binge drinking (consuming five or more drinks per occasion for men, and four or more drinks per occasion for women).2, 3 The direct and indirect economic costs of excessive drinking in 1998 were $184.6 billion.4 The reduction of excessive alcohol consumption is thus a matter of major public health and economic interest; this objective is a central goal in the U.S. public health agenda for the year 2010.5

This review examines the utility of enacting or maintaining limits on the days of the week on which alcoholic beverages may be sold (“days of sale”) as a strategy to prevent excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. The limitation of days of sale of alcoholic beverages is here defined as “applying regulatory authority to limit the days that alcoholic beverages may be sold at on- and off-premises alcoholic beverage outlets.” Limiting may be either maintaining existing limits (e.g., on the sale of alcoholic beverages on Sundays) or extending current limits (e.g., eliminating Sunday sales by repealing current authorization for such sales). Days of sale may be regulated at national, state, or local levels. On-premises retailing refers to the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption at the point of sale (e.g., at bars, restaurants, or clubs); off-premises retailing refers to the sale (e.g., at package stores, liquor stores, grocery stores, or convenience stores) of contained alcoholic beverages for consumption elsewhere. Because most of the studies reviewed consider removing limits on days of sale (e.g., allowing sale of alcoholic beverages on Sunday when Sunday sales had previously not been allowed), the intervention of public health interest for the review is the study control condition (i.e., maintaining limits on days of sale).

In the U.S., policies restricting the days of sale currently apply to Sundays only. There are several variations on the regulation of Sunday alcohol sales in the U.S. including full bans, reduced hours relative to other days of the week, restrictions on the sale of alcoholic beverages with a high alcohol content, and the authorization of local decision making.6 A total of fourteen states (Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Utah), ban alcohol sales at off-premises retail alcohol outlets on Sundays. Fourteen states (Alaska, California, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming) do not restrict Sunday alcohol sales. The remaining 22 states and the District of Columbia allow Sunday sales with restrictions regarding hours and/or types of alcoholic beverages sold. Outside of the U.S., current policies restricting the days of sale may apply to days other than Sunday (e.g., some countries prohibit alcohol sales on Saturdays).

In the U.S., the control of days and hours of sale at the local level is often pre-empted by state regulations prohibiting local authorities from enacting stricter alcohol control regulations in the state in general.7, 8 However, in some states, counties and other local jurisdictions are allowed to establish their own alcohol control policies. The nature of this authority varies by state and may allow cities or counties to have reduced hours from those stipulated by the state; have the same hours on Sunday as available during the rest of the week; or limit the sale of alcohol on Sundays to specific areas or locations. Fourteen states provide for local authority regarding days of sale, and four more allow Sunday sales in limited locations within the state.6 In 1995, New Mexico repealed a ban on off-premises alcohol sales on Sundays, but also allowed local jurisdictions to hold referenda to restore a local ban on Sunday sales. Alaska and Kentucky also allow counties to independently restrict alcohol sales.

This review addresses the effects on excessive alcohol consumption and related harms of maintaining or increasing restrictions on the days of sale at on- or off-premises outlets.

Section snippets

Findings and Recommendations from Other Reviews and Advisory Groups

Several reviews conducted in the U.S. have concluded that restricting the days of sale is an effective strategy for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. For example, a narrative review conducted by Single9 concluded that controlling the days (and hours) of sale may influence levels of impaired driving and other drinking problems. A systematic review published by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration's Center for Substance Abuse Prevention10 in 1999

Methods

The methods of the Community Guide were used to systematically review scientific studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of limiting or maintaining existing limits on days of sale for preventing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. More details on the Community Guide review process are presented elsewhere.16 In brief, this process involves forming a systematic review development team; developing a conceptual approach to organizing, grouping, and selecting interventions;

Intervention Effectiveness

Fourteen studies21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 that examined the effects of changes in days of sale met the inclusion criteria for the review. These studies assessed changes that took place in cities (Athens GA [two studies] and Perth and Brisbane, Australia); states (50 U.S. states, New Mexico [two studies], and Victoria and New South Wales, Australia); and countries or large regions of countries (Norway [one study], Sweden [three studies], and Scotland [one study]).

Conclusion

This review found that increasing days of sale by allowing previously banned alcohol sales on either Saturdays or Sundays increased excessive alcohol consumption and related harms, including motor vehicle crashes, incidents of DUI, police interventions against intoxicated people, and, in some cases, assaults and domestic disturbances. Thus, maintaining existing limits on Saturday or Sunday sales—the control condition in these studies—can prevent alcohol-related harms that would be associated

Discussion

We found strong and consistent evidence that limiting alcohol availability by maintaining existing limits on the days of sale is an effective strategy for preventing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. In addition, there is some direct evidence that the imposition of increased limits on days of sale may reduce alcohol-related harms. However, further scientific evidence is needed to fully assess the symmetry between maintaining existing limits and implementing new restrictions on

References (39)

  • P.A. Briss et al.

    Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services—methods

    Am J Prev Med

    (2000)
  • G.P. McMillan et al.

    Geographic variability in alcohol-related crashes in response to legalized Sunday packaged alcohol sales in New Mexico

    Accid Anal Prev

    (2007)
  • Alcohol-attributable deaths and years of potential life lost—U.S., 2001

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2004)
  • Health, U.S., 2005 with chartbook on trends in the health of America

  • J.W. Miller et al.

    Binge drinking and associated health risk behaviors among high school students

    Pediatrics

    (2007)
  • H. Harwood

    Updating estimates of the economic costs of alcohol abuse in the U.S.: estimates, update methods, and dataReport prepared by The Lewin Group for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism

    (2000)
  • Healthy people 2010

  • Sunday spirits sales: Rolling back the Blue Laws

  • J. Mosher

    Alcohol issues policy briefing paper: the perils of preemption

    (2001)
  • E. Gorovitz et al.

    Preemption or prevention?Lessons from efforts to control firearms, alcohol, and tobacco

    J Public Health Policy

    (1998)
  • E. Single

    Public drinking, problems and prevention measures in twelve countries: results of the WHO project on public drinking

    Contemp Drug Prob

    (1997)
  • Preventing problems related to alcohol availability: environmental approaches

    (2008)
  • T. Stockwell et al.

    Controls on the physical availability of alcohol

  • D.I. Smith

    Effectiveness of restrictions on availability as a means of preventing alcohol-related problems

    Contemp Drug Prob

    (1988)
  • T.F. Babor et al.

    Alcohol: no ordinary commodity-research and public policy

    (2010)
  • European Alcohol Action Plan, 2000–2005

    (2000)
  • Strategic Task Force on Alcohol—second report

    (2004)
  • M.W. Lipsey et al.

    Is there a causal relationship between alcohol use and violence?

  • World Development Indicators 2006

  • Cited by (93)

    • Associations between alcohol and cannabis use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a community survey

      2022, Addictive Behaviors Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Due to the observational nature of our study, we are unable to determine whether accessing alcohol or cannabis through home delivery is causally related to higher levels of consumption. However, a substantial body of research on alcohol outlet density presents strong evidence that greater physical availability of alcohol promotes higher consumption (Campbell et al., 2009; Middleton et al., 2010; Popova, Giesbrecht, Bekmuradov, & Patra, 2009; Sherk et al., 2018). Limitations of our study include the use of a cross-sectional design with an online convenience sample.

    • Public Health Measures and Prevention of Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease

      2022, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
    • Alcohol Consumption and 15 Causes of Fatal Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      2022, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite these limitations, the findings in this meta-analysis have public health implications. Effective population-level approaches for preventing excessive drinking include those recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force, such as strategies to decrease the availability of and access to alcohol or to increase alcohol prices.110–112 In addition to reducing the number and concentration of alcohol outlets, having dram shop liability laws to hold retailers accountable for harms incurred by service to intoxicated or underage patrons could also reduce alcohol-attributable injury deaths.111,113

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed at www.thecommunityguide.org/about/task-force-members.html.

    View full text