American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Transactions of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal MedicineObstetric outcomes after surgical abortion at ≥20 weeks' gestation
Section snippets
Material and methods
Patients who underwent dilation and evacuation at our hospital at ≥20 weeks' gestation from 1996 to 2003, and who received subsequent prenatal care at The New York Weill Cornell Medical Center were identified by searching computerized hospital records using the appropriate procedure codes. Gestational age had been confirmed by ultrasound in all cases. Medical records were reviewed to collect data about the terminated pregnancies, including the technique of surgical abortion, and the outcomes of
Results
There were 120 pregnancies in 89 women included in the study. These pregnancies were identified from a group of 383 patients who underwent surgical abortion at ≥20 weeks' gestation from 1996 to 2003. The outcomes of 62 of these pregnancies were briefly summarized in a previous publication that focused on operative techniques of surgical abortion late in the second trimester.7
The median maternal age at the time of surgical abortion was 33 years (interquartile range 29-37 years), and the median
Comment
D&E is the most common procedure used to terminate a pregnancy in the second trimester in the United States. Lower complication rates have been described for D&E compared with medical induction.1, 2 D&E may also be preferable to some patients because it is typically done on an outpatient basis, and women do not have to endure labor. When Grimes et al attempted to perform a randomized clinical trial to compare D&E with medical induction using misoprostol and mifepristone, most women did not
References (11)
- et al.
A comparison of medical induction and dilation and evacuation for second-trimester abortion
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2002) - et al.
Impact of midtrimester dilation and evacuation on subsequent pregnancy outcome
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2002) - et al.
Abortion at 18-22 weeks by laminaria dilation and evacuation
Obstet Gynecol
(1996) - et al.
Dilation and evacuation at >or =20 weeks: comparison of operative techniques
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2004) - et al.
Methods for induced abortion
Obstet Gynecol
(2004)
Cited by (16)
Fetal death beyond of 14 weeks of gestation: Induction of labor and obtaining of uterine vacuity
2015, Gynecologie Obstetrique et FertiliteObtaining of uterine vacuity in pregnancy loss
2014, Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la ReproductionIs induced abortion with misoprostol a risk factor for late abortion or preterm delivery in subsequent pregnancies?
2009, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyCitation Excerpt :Second trimester surgical abortions that use dilatation and evacuation may be associated with a higher risk of subsequent premature delivery [22,23]. Uncontrolled and small series [24–27] suggest, however, that this method is not a risk factor for midtrimester pregnancy loss or spontaneous preterm birth. These conflicting results can be at least partly explained by differences or weaknesses in their methods, including their use of registries or databases, small series with a consequent lack of power, retrospective studies, absence of a control group, heterogeneity in abortion techniques, differences in gestational age at abortion, and possibly uncontrolled biases, despite the use of logistic regression analysis to control the potential confounders.
Surgical Abortion in the Second Trimester
2008, Reproductive Health MattersCervical function and prematurity
2007, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and GynaecologyCitation Excerpt :Additionally, the method of abortion in both studies was largely surgical and both studies found that induced abortion was associated with an increased risk of idiopathic preterm labour and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) but not preterm birth due to pregnancy-induced hypertension, lending weight to the hypothesis that the mechanism of preterm birth in this scenario is due to cervical damage. In contrast, in a prospective study from the US on surgical abortion at ≥ 20 weeks' gestation, the association between abortion and increased risk of preterm delivery was limited to those in whom the indication for induced abortion was cervical dilation and/or PPROM.24 In other words, in this latter study, it appears that women who were predisposed to spontaneous cervical dilation and PPROM such that induced abortion had been required, were more likely to deliver preterm in a subsequent pregnancy.
Management Options for Women with Midtrimester Fetal Loss: A Case Report
2007, Journal of Midwifery and Women's HealthCitation Excerpt :Complications associated with D&E included hemorrhage, infection, cervical laceration, and uterine perforation. Additionally, several other studies conducted by one group of researchers found no increased risk of midtrimester loss or preterm birth in future pregnancies for women who have a midtrimester D&E.6–8 Best practices for the use of misoprostol are not available.
Presented at the Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, February 7-12, 2005, Reno, Nev.