Consensus StatementMethods for injury surveillance in international cricket
References (14)
- et al.
Bowling workload and the risk of injury in elite cricket fast bowlers
J Sci Med Sport
(2003) - et al.
Measures to prevent cricket injuries. An overview
Sports Med
(1999) - et al.
Comparing Injuries of Spin Bowling with Fast Bowling in Young Cricketers
Clin J Sports Med
(2002) - et al.
Acute injury incidence in professional county club cricket players (1985–1995)
Br J Sports Med
(2000) A prospective study of injuries at first class counties in England and Wales 2001 and 2002 seasons
- et al.
Injuries in Australian cricket at first class level 1995/96 to 2000/01
Br J Sports Med
(2002) Cricket injuries: a longitudinal study of the nature of injuries to South African cricketers
Br J Sports Med
(2003)
Cited by (54)
Prospective reporting of injury in community-level cricket: A systematic review to identify research priorities
2020, Journal of Science and Medicine in SportCitation Excerpt :The need for robust data collection with regard to sporting injuries was recognised by the Australian Sports Injury Prevention Taskforce (ASIPT) in 1997 and this led to the Australian Sports Injury Data Dictionary (ASIDD).4 Cricket was the first international sport to publish a consensus statement for the surveillance of injuries in 2005,5 with an update published in 2016.6 The purpose of the consensus statement was to standardise data collection in order to improve the comparability of cricket injury studies globally.
Incidence and impact of time loss and non-time-loss shoulder injury in elite South African cricketers: A one-season, prospective cohort study
2019, Journal of Science and Medicine in SportThe incidence, prevalence, nature, severity and mechanisms of injury in elite female cricketers: A prospective cohort study
2019, Journal of Science and Medicine in SportCitation Excerpt :The exposure hours were estimated based on averages for the number of matches played, rather than collecting individual match exposure. However, exposure in terms of hours of play was calculated in accordance with the internationally recognised cricket injury definition.17,20 Injury types were not defined using uniform diagnostic criteria and therefore the coding of the injury diagnosis might not be consistent between the medical professionals inputting the data into AMS medical notes, limiting the accuracy of the data.
Fast bowling match workloads over 5-26 days and risk of injury in the following month
2015, Journal of Science and Medicine in SportCitation Excerpt :The Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) considers observational studies of this nature with de-identified data to expose participants to ‘negligible’ risk. In 2005, cricket researchers published consensus international injury definitions for the sport and the methods of this survey adhere to the international definitions.17,18 This study concerns fast bowling injuries only and therefore includes a dataset of injuries in fast bowlers sustained either with an acute non-contact bowling mechanism or a gradual onset bowling mechanism.
Measuring physiotherapy intervention in high performance sport
2014, Physical Therapy in Sport