ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Survey of asthma care in Taiwan: a comparison of asthma specialists and general practitioners

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63555-7Get rights and content

Background

Asthma is a common disease in Taiwan. The promotion of quality care for asthmatic patients should focus not only on new treatment remedies but also on patient adherence to treatment and a continuous education program integrated into treatment plans. One reason for patients' poor response to treatment is the lack of asthma knowledge on the part of physicians in terms of attitudes toward treatment.

Objective

To investigate the current status of asthma treatment among asthma specialists and general practitioners and their relative acceptance of and adherence to treatment guidelines.

Methods

One thousand questionnaires were distributed to physicians throughout Taiwan using a randomized sampling procedure. The questionnaire asked about the use of different kinds of medications, including inhaled corticosteroids, to treat asthma; adherence to asthma treatment guidelines; the use of a peak flow meter for monitoring asthma status; and self-efficacy in the treatment of asthma.

Results

A total of 526 questionnaires were returned. Of these, 90.4% of specialists and 63.2% of general practitioners would follow the guidelines for patient care (P = .002). It was significant that 79.8% of specialists but only 41.9% of general practitioners would instruct patients to use a peak flow meter to monitor symptoms (P < .001). Asthma specialists also seemed to be significantly more competent than general practitioners regarding asthma knowledge, instruction of inhalation techniques, use of peak flow meters to monitor symptoms, and making an action plan.

Conclusions

To minimize the knowledge gap between specialists and general practitioners regarding asthma treatment, recognized treatment guidelines need to be popularized or simplified. Furthermore, the continuing education of general practitioners in asthma knowledge and management skills is important.

REFERENCES (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • SABA prescriptions and asthma management practices in patients treated by specialists in Taiwan: Results from the SABINA III study

    2022, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
    Citation Excerpt :

    One possible explanation for this finding is that all patients in this cohort were under specialist care, whereas the SABINA III cohort included a relatively high proportion of patients under primary care. In fact, results from a survey in Taiwan reported that a significantly higher proportion of specialists compared with primary care physicians would follow treatment guidelines for patient care (90.4% vs 63.2%).16 The purchase of SABA OTC is not permitted in Taiwan since SABA is a prescription drug per the regulations.

  • Mapping low-resource contexts to prepare for lung health interventions in four countries (FRESH AIR): a mixed-method study

    2022, The Lancet Global Health
    Citation Excerpt :

    We adapted the materials to each local setting. The quantitative questionnaires included demographic questions and were a compilation of existing validated questionnaires (the revised brief-Illness Perception Questionnaire, community member risk behaviour regarding cooking or heating and tobacco use, and health-care professional treatment behaviour).23–27 The questionnaires for community members and health-care professionals were tailored according to our preliminary qualitative findings and pilot-tested in each setting.19

  • When you can't have the cake and eat it too. A study of medical doctors' priorities in complex choice situations

    2012, Social Science and Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    These studies do not depict the relative importance of different concerns, but such qualitative studies nevertheless leave an impression that clinical effectiveness is generally much more important to doctors than cost containment and that the needs and preferences of the individual patient have become gradually more important over the last 30–40 years (e.g. Prosser & Walley, 2005). Additionally, we know little about how the characteristics of the doctor, such as sex, age and speciality, influence attitudes and the weight put on different factors in the daily trade-offs, but we find it interesting that a few survey studies suggest that, female doctors seem to put more weight on patients’ preferences (Krupat et al., 2000), and that GPs are more concerned with the individual patient’s needs and preferences and their own clinical experience than are hospital consultants (Carlsen & Bringedal, 2011; Yeh et al., 2006). There is a need, however, for studies that can address and quantify interrelations and give more insight into how doctors, more or less deliberately, are actually trading off different concerns when making clinical decisions.

  • Clinician Agreement, Self-Efficacy, and Adherence with the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma

    2018, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although the lack of strong endorsement of guideline recommendations among primary care clinicians is notable, there were several key guideline recommendations that were not strongly endorsed by either group including the provision of a written asthma action plan. This result extends published data from several smaller studies and is in contrast to the evidence (grade B, small number of randomized controlled trials) that support use of treatment plans19-23 although their effectiveness when used by specialists has recently been questioned.24 In addition, neither of the clinician groups reported frequent use of asthma control assessment tools, and home peak flow assessment rates were especially low.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This study was supported by grant DOH92-HP-1117 from the Department of Health, Taiwan

View full text