ReviewA different depression: clinical distinctions between bipolar and unipolar depression
Introduction
Bipolar disorders, which affect between 1.4% and 6.4% of the US population Angst, 1998, Akiskal et al., 2000, Judd and Akiskal, 2003, exact an enormous toll, including increased risk of premature death from suicide. There is growing evidence that bipolar disorder, especially the bipolar II subtype, is underdiagnosed Ghaemi et al., 2000, Benazzi, 1999a, Manning et al., 1997, Dunner and Tay, 1993. Delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis may lead to delayed treatment, thus prolonging suffering. Unfortunately, accurate and timely diagnosis is sometimes difficult. Patients with bipolar disorder often present in the depressive phase, which can easily be mistaken for unipolar depression. Because the treatment of unipolar depression is substantially different from that of bipolar depression, patients with bipolar depression who are assumed to have unipolar depression will receive inappropriate therapy that can increase the risk of manic switch or cycle acceleration Bowden, 2001, Ghaemi et al., 2000, Altshuler et al., 1995, Wehr et al., 1988. New, validated screening tools, along with an awareness of the importance of a complete history, can greatly improve diagnosis and management. This paper will review the clinical distinctions between bipolar and unipolar depression, and the important differences between bipolar I and II disorder, as well as provide guidance on how the clinician can incorporate more focused diagnostic techniques into a typical office practice. Given the impact of untreated bipolar disorder, the positive influence of increased diligence in diagnosis is substantial.
Section snippets
Defining depression
The foundation of all mood disorders is a “sustained emotion that colors the perception of the world” (APA, 1994). Mood disorders are differentiated into unipolar depressive disorder and bipolar disorder by the type of mood alteration, its severity, and its longitudinal pattern. The major distinction between unipolar depressive disorder and bipolar disorder is the presence in the latter of mania or hypomania at some time during the disease course. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical
Evidence
There is ample evidence that bipolar disorder is underdiagnosed. In two studies, Ghaemi et al., 1999, Ghaemi et al., 2000 documented that approximately 40% of patients with bipolar disorder had been misdiagnosed previously as having unipolar depressive disorder. One study drew patients from a general clinic, while the other assessed patients admitted to an urban academic center; both were limited by small sample size. The earlier study also documented an average of 7.5 years between the
Key clinical distinctions
Given the potential consequences of misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder as unipolar depressive disorder, it is essential to focus on key clinical distinctions between the two mood disorders. While some of these distinctions, such as demographics, may not provide significant help in the diagnosis and management of an individual patient, others, such as history of past hypomanic episodes, can be useful in differentiating bipolar disorder from unipolar depressive disorder. One limitation of many of
Treating bipolar depression: can risk of manic switch be minimized?
Mood stabilizers are the foundation for treatment of bipolar disorder. These include lithium, valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, and the atypical antipsychotics.
The definition of mood stabilization is under debate. Some clinicians feel that a mood stabilizer is any drug that treats or prevents one pole without increasing the risk of inducing or worsening the other pole Sachs, 1996, Bowden, 1997, Bowden, 1998. Others have proposed that a mood stabilizer possesses therapeutic activity in both
Conclusion
There is strong evidence that bipolar disorder, especially the bipolar II subtype, is often underdiagnosed. Delay of treatment specific for bipolar disorder can lead to undesirable clinical consequences, such as cycle acceleration after use of antidepressants without mood stabilization. The differentiation between bipolar disorder and unipolar depressive disorder can be challenging. However, there are clinically relevant differences in patient characteristics, clinical course, diagnostic
Acknowledgements
Funding for this manuscript was provided by an unrestricted educational grant from GlaxoSmithKline.
References (72)
- et al.
Bipolar outcome in the course of depressive illness. Phenomenologic, familial, and pharmacologic predictors
J. Affect. Disord.
(1983) - et al.
Re-evaluating the prevalence of and diagnostic composition within the broad clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders
J. Affect. Disord.
(2000) - et al.
Validating antidepressant-associated hypomania (bipolar III): a systematic comparison with spontaneous hypomania (bipolar II)
J. Affect. Disord.
(2003) The emerging epidemiology of hypomania and bipolar II disorder
J. Affect. Disord.
(1998)Bipolar II versus unipolar chronic depression: a 312-case study
Compr. Psychiatry
(1999)Sensitivity and specificity of clinical markers for the diagnosis of bipolar II disorder
Compr. Psychiatry
(2001)- et al.
Delineating bipolar II mixed states in the Ravenna–San Diego collaborative study: the relative prevalence and diagnostic significance of hypomanic features during major depressive episodes
J. Affect. Disord.
(2001) - et al.
Refining the evaluation of bipolar II: beyond the strict SCID-CV guidelines for hypomania
J. Affect. Disord.
(2003) New concepts in mood stabilization: evidence for the effectiveness of valproate and lamotrigine
Neuropsychopharmacology
(1998)- et al.
The efficacy of lamotrigine in rapid cycling and non-rapid cycling patients with bipolar disorder
Biol. Psychiatry
(1999)