CommentBringing stillbirths out of the shadows
References (10)
- et al.
National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2009 with trends since 1995: a systematic analysis
Lancet
(2011) What is Why 17?
- et al.
Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count?
Lancet
(2011) - et al.
Stillbirths: why they matter
Lancet
(2011) Global burden of disease (GBD)
Cited by (53)
Maternal mortality, stillbirths, and neonatal mortality: a transition model based on analyses of 151 countries
2023, The Lancet Global HealthTraditional practices during pregnancy and birth, and perceptions of perinatal losses in women of rural Pakistan
2020, MidwiferyCitation Excerpt :Healthcare workers have a crucial role to play in creation of respectful care environment (Bond et al., 2018) and offering adequate counselling and bereavement care to parents following a perinatal loss (Ravaldi et al., 2018). Encouraging bereaved women to express their grief freely can help highlight stillbirth burden and make it visible to build momentum for preventive actions in countries with a high burden of perinatal mortality (Mullan and Horton, 2011). Communities need to recognise that grief following a perinatal death has a profound impact on parents (Avelin et al., 2013; Nuzum et al., 2018), and overcoming existing misconceptions surrounding perinatal deaths through community education may lead to greater recognition of perinatal deaths (Froen et al., 2011).
Stillbirth in Australia 1: The road to now: Two decades of stillbirth research and advocacy in Australia
2020, Women and BirthCitation Excerpt :Giving parents permission to talk about their loss, these organisations took the first step in shifting stillbirth from private tragedy to public health concern and have had an enduring impact on policy and practice, including the issuing of birth and death certificates for stillborn babies. In 2011, the landmark Lancet Stillbirths Series [10,26,59–61] received unprecedented media attention to bring stillbirths “out of the shadows” [27]. The series highlighted interventions which could reduce up to 50% of stillbirths globally, and included a specific call to action for HIC [10] along with identification of research priorities and a comprehensive analysis of risk factors for stillbirth [28].
Association between interpregnancy interval and subsequent stillbirth in 58 low-income and middle-income countries: a retrospective analysis using Demographic and Health Surveys
2020, The Lancet Global HealthCitation Excerpt :Understanding the heterogeneity in the exposure effect for different demographic subgroups of our international cohort is important for two reasons. First, as discussed above, most stillbirths occur in LMICs,2 thus highlighting the need to understand the effect of interpregnancy intervals in geographically and socioeconomically diverse populations. Second, wealth and previous pregnancy outcomes—which are known risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes—are associated with interpregnancy interval, thus bringing into question whether interpregnancy interval is merely a marker of at-risk women.28
Stillbirths: the hidden burden of malaria in pregnancy
2017, The Lancet Global Health