A regression-based method for mapping traffic-related air pollution: application and testing in four contrasting urban environments
Introduction
Growing concern about the effects of traffic emissions on respiratory health, and growing pressures for policy and management action to reduce air pollution levels, have highlighted the need for improved methods of mapping traffic-related pollution in urban areas both for exposure assessment and policy support.
The acute health effects of short-term exposures to traffic-related pollution have been widely demonstrated (for detailed reviews see Committee on Medical Effects of Air Pollutants, 1995, Committee of the Environmental and Occupational Health Assembly of the American Thoracic Society, 1996). Much less, however, is known about the chronic effects of exposure. A number of studies, mainly in the USA, have reported associations with particulates and/or sulfur oxides (Dockery et al., 1989, Schwartz, 1993, Pope et al., 1995), but replication of these effects in European studies has proved difficult. Several studies have found (often relatively weak) associations between chronic morbidity or mortality and traffic-related pollution, measured either in terms of distance from road or traffic volume on the nearest roads (Wjst et al., 1993, Edwards et al., 1994, Weiland et al., 1994), or using estimated exposures to NO2 as a marker for traffic-related pollution (NILU, 1991, Oosterlee et al., 1996). On the other hand, a number of studies — including several which have attempted to use more specific measures of exposure, such as modelled or measured NO2 concentrations — have found no detectable effects (Livingstone et al., 1996, Magnus et al., 1998, Wilkinson et al., 1999). The extent to which long-term exposure to relatively low levels of traffic-related air pollution causes or increases susceptibility to respiratory illness thus remains uncertain. Much of this uncertainty relates to the problems of acquiring reliable estimates of exposure to traffic-related pollution, at the individual or small-area level, across large populations and cities. Nevertheless, if such effects do occur, they would have serious public health implications, for though the relative risk may be low, the number of people exposed would be very large, representing a high attributable risk. This would also have significant policy implications, for it would imply the need to reduce background, as well as peak, concentrations of the pollutants concerned.
Maps are needed, equally, to inform management and policy. In the UK, for example, the National Air Quality Strategy (Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1997), which was updated in 1999 (Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1999), introduces air-quality targets to be met by the year 2005 and obliges local authorities to establish Air Quality Management Areas (AQMAs) in zones where these are likely to be exceeded. The Integrated Transport White Paper, published in July 1998, further calls for local traffic management plans aimed at reducing traffic congestion and air pollution, and promises legislation giving greater powers to local authorities to control road traffic in order to improve air quality. Local authorities thus have an urgent need for ways of mapping traffic-related air pollution, to help identify potential AQMAs, to target management action, and to predict and monitor the effects of intervention.
Nevertheless, mapping traffic-related pollution is no trivial task. Levels of road traffic pollution vary substantially, often over distances of metres, and pollution patterns in urban areas are complex (Laxen and Noordally, 1987, Hewitt, 1991). Monitored data on urban air pollution are also sparse. Most urban networks comprise only a few sites, and those which do exist can rarely be taken as representative of the exposures experienced by the population as a whole. Some form of modelling is, therefore, essential if accurate maps of urban air pollution are to be obtained.
A wide range of line-source dispersion models have been developed in recent years, which might ostensibly be used for this purpose. These include: the CALINE models (Benson, 1992); the CAR model (Eerhens et al., 1993); the ADMS model (CERC, 1999); the Operational Street Pollution Model (OPMS) (Berkowicz et al., 1994); and the AERMOD model (USEPA, 1998). In general, however, the performance of line-source models has not always been good (Henriques and Briggs, 1998), and the data demands and intensive processing requirements of the more sophisticated models mean that they are often difficult to apply for pollution mapping across whole cities at the small-area scale. The costs of many of these models may also make them prohibitive for local authority use. For many applications, therefore, the need is for simpler yet more robust methods of pollution mapping which can provide high-resolution, city-wide maps of traffic-related pollution using existing or readily obtainable data.
Regression mapping offers one such approach. It is based on the principles that: (a) environmental conditions for the variable of interest can be estimated from a small number of readily measurable predictor variables; and (b) that the relationship between the target variable and these predictors can be reliably assessed on the basis of a small sample survey or ‘training’ area. Probably the main use of this approach to date has been in the interpretation of remotely sensed data (Fuller et al., 1998, Li et al., 1998), where regression methods are used to determine the relationship between the measured signature (e.g. reflectance) and land cover or other attributes derived from ground truth surveys. Increasingly, however, regression methods have also been used for a wide range of other applications, including: mapping of landscape quality (Briggs and France, 1980); soil conditions (Knotters et al., 1995); salt contamination (Mattson and Godfrey, 1994); and air pollution (Wagner, 1994). The study reported here builds upon one such application — the use of regression mapping to estimate mean annual concentrations of traffic-related pollution as a basis for examining small area variations in air quality and chronic respiratory health (the SAVIAH study).
Section snippets
The SAVIAH study
Details of the SAVIAH study have been reported elsewhere (Briggs et al., 1997, Elliott and Briggs, 1998, Fischer et al., 1998, Lebret et al., 1999). In brief, the study was an EU-funded, multicentre project, aimed at developing and testing methods for assessing the relationship between traffic-related air pollution and health, at the small-area scale. The study took place in four areas: Huddersfield (UK), Amsterdam (NL), Prague (CR) and Poznan (PO). With the exception of Poznan, the main
The study areas
The revised SAVIAH model, described above, was applied and tested in four contrasting areas: (a) in the original Huddersfield area, using data for the following sampling year (May 1994–April 1995); (b) in the London boroughs of Hammersmith and Ealing; (c) in the city of Sheffield; and (d) in a small part of Northampton. Details of these study areas are given in Table 2. The study in Hammersmith and Ealing was undertaken as part of a project to investigate relationships between hospital
Calibration
Results of the calibration analysis are shown in Table 6 and Fig. 1. As these indicate, local calibration of the SAVIAH model generates strong and statistically significant regression models in all four study areas. r2 values range from 0.51 (P=0.02) in Huddersfield to 0.76 (P=0.001) in Hammersmith and Ealing. As is to be expected, however, both the regression coefficients (intercept and slope) and standard errors of the estimates (S.E.E.) vary substantially between the study areas, broadly
Discussion and conclusions
The results of applying and testing the SAVIAH regression model in the four study areas show that the original model provides a reliable relative measure of mean annual NO2 concentrations across a wide range of urban environments, but may substantially under- or over-estimate actual concentrations. The model may be successfully calibrated at the local level using only a small number (approx. 10) of passive sampler sites, monitored for only a few (approx. 5–7) 2-week periods in any year. The
References (51)
A review of the development and application of the CALINE3 and CALINE4 models
Atmos Environ
(1992)- et al.
A survey of nitrogen dioxide concentrations in the United Kingdom using diffusion tubes, July–December 1991
Atmos Environ
(1994) - et al.
Countryside survey from ground and space: different perspectives, complementary results
J Environ Manage
(1998) - et al.
Modelling urban air pollution
Atmos Environ
(1973) - et al.
A numerical evaluation of chemical interferences in the measurement of ambient nitrogen dioxide by passive diffusion samplers
Atmos Environ
(1997) - et al.
A comparison of kriging, co-kriging and kriging combined with regression for spatial interpolation of horizon depth with censored observations
Geoderma
(1995) - et al.
Nitrogen dioxide distribution in street canyons
Atmos Environ
(1987) - et al.
Development and evaluation of SBLINE, a suite of models for the prediction of pollution concentrations from vehicles in urban areas
Sci Total Environ
(1996) - et al.
A comparison study of three urban air pollution models
Atmos Environ
(1989) Particulate air pollution and chronic respiratory disease
Environ Res
(1993)
Self-reported wheezing and allergic rhinitis in children and traffic density on street of residence
Arch Epidemiol
Development and evaluation of simple models for the flow, turbulence and pollutant concentration fields within an urban street canyon
Atmos Environ
Landscape evaluation: a comparative study
J Environ Manage
Mapping urban air pollution using GIS: a regression-based approach
Int J Geogr Inf Sci
Modelling spatial variations in air quality using GIS
Health effects of outdoor pollution
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
Effects of inhaled particles on respiratory health of children
Am Rev Respir Dis
Cited by (0)
- 1
Present address: ERM Ltd, Eaton House, Wallbrook Court, North Hinksey Lane, Oxford OX2 0QS, UK.
- 2
Present address: Autodesk Enterprise Solutions, Yorktown House, 8 Frimley Road, Camberley, Surrey GU15 3BA, UK.