Automated serial ECG comparison based on the Minnesota code
References (22)
- et al.
A point-score system for the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy
Am Heart
(1968) - et al.
A new epidemiological classification system for interim myocardial infarction from serial changes
Am J Cardiol
(1989) - et al.
Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study
Lancet
(1991) - et al.
Myocardial infarction
- et al.
Cardiac infarction score: an electrocardiographic coding scheme for ischaemic heart disease
Circulation
(1981) - et al.
The electrocardiogram in population studies: a classification system
Circulation
(1960) Use and abuse of electrocardiographic classification systems in epidemiologic studies
Eur J Cardiol
(1978)Part I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease to cholesterol lowering
JAMA
(1984)- et al.
Helsinki heart study: primary prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia: safety of treatment, changes in risk factors and incidence of coronary heart disease
N Engl J Med
(1987) - et al.
The Dalhousie program: a comprehensive analysis program for rest and exercise electrocardiograms
A computer program for classification of ECGs according to the Minnesota code
Cited by (75)
Prevalence of major and minor electrocardiographic abnormalities in one million primary care Latinos
2021, Journal of ElectrocardiologyCitation Excerpt :Patients with same “ID” were considered identical and, therefore, only the first ECG was considered for further analysis. We ran the University of Glasgow 12‑lead ECG analysis software to automatically analyse the ECG database [17,18]. This is an established program for ECG analysis that has shown positive results for signal processing (e.g. identifying waves and computing axes, durations, amplitudes and intervals), rhythm analysis and diagnostic interpretation, and thus it is fit for use in epidemiological studies [19,20].
Evaluation of mortality in bundle branch block patients from an electronic cohort: Clinical Outcomes in Digital Electrocardiography (CODE) study
2019, Journal of ElectrocardiologyCitation Excerpt :The clinical information, ECGs tracings and reports were stored in a specific database. For the purpose of the present study, the Glasgow 12-lead ECG analysis program (release 28.4.1, issued on June 16th 2009) was used to automatically interpret all ECGs available in the database, exporting the diagnosis, codified by both Glasgow and Minnesota codes [11]. ECGs were analyzed by a team of fourteen trained cardiologists using standardized criteria [12].
Tele-electrocardiography and bigdata: The CODE (Clinical Outcomes in Digital Electrocardiography) study
2019, Journal of ElectrocardiologyCitation Excerpt :The classification model was tested on 4557 medical reports evaluated manually, with the following macro F1 scores achieved: [1] 1d AV block = 0.729; [2] RBBB = 0.849; [3] LBBB = 0.838; [4] Sinus Bradycardia = 0.991; [5] AF = 0.993; [6] Sinus Tachycardia = 0.974. All ECG tracings in the database were also analyzed by the Glasgow 12‑lead ECG analysis program (release 28.4.1, issued on June 16th 2009), exporting the automatic diagnosis, codified by both Glasgow Diagnostic Statements [11] and Minnesota codes [12]. Correspondences between CODE classes, Glasgow Diagnostic Statements and Minnesota codes were mapped.
Detection of Arterial Hypertension Through Electrocardiograms
2022, Computing in CardiologyAssociation between Atrioventricular Block and Mortality in Primary Care Patients: The CODE Study
2022, Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia