Automated serial ECG comparison based on the Minnesota code

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0736(96)80016-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The Minnesota code was introduced in 1960, and since then, a number of computer programs have been written for classifying electrocardiograms according to the rules of the code. However, in 1982, extended rules for serial comparison based on the Minnesota code were published. This article presents the details of implementation of automated serial electrocardiographic comparison using the code. Its application in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study, which was a double-blind trial of lipid lowering in 6,595 men, is also discussed.

References (22)

  • DuisterhoutJS et al.

    A computer program for classification of ECGs according to the Minnesota code

  • Cited by (75)

    • Prevalence of major and minor electrocardiographic abnormalities in one million primary care Latinos

      2021, Journal of Electrocardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patients with same “ID” were considered identical and, therefore, only the first ECG was considered for further analysis. We ran the University of Glasgow 12‑lead ECG analysis software to automatically analyse the ECG database [17,18]. This is an established program for ECG analysis that has shown positive results for signal processing (e.g. identifying waves and computing axes, durations, amplitudes and intervals), rhythm analysis and diagnostic interpretation, and thus it is fit for use in epidemiological studies [19,20].

    • Evaluation of mortality in bundle branch block patients from an electronic cohort: Clinical Outcomes in Digital Electrocardiography (CODE) study

      2019, Journal of Electrocardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The clinical information, ECGs tracings and reports were stored in a specific database. For the purpose of the present study, the Glasgow 12-lead ECG analysis program (release 28.4.1, issued on June 16th 2009) was used to automatically interpret all ECGs available in the database, exporting the diagnosis, codified by both Glasgow and Minnesota codes [11]. ECGs were analyzed by a team of fourteen trained cardiologists using standardized criteria [12].

    • Tele-electrocardiography and bigdata: The CODE (Clinical Outcomes in Digital Electrocardiography) study

      2019, Journal of Electrocardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The classification model was tested on 4557 medical reports evaluated manually, with the following macro F1 scores achieved: [1] 1d AV block = 0.729; [2] RBBB = 0.849; [3] LBBB = 0.838; [4] Sinus Bradycardia = 0.991; [5] AF = 0.993; [6] Sinus Tachycardia = 0.974. All ECG tracings in the database were also analyzed by the Glasgow 12‑lead ECG analysis program (release 28.4.1, issued on June 16th 2009), exporting the automatic diagnosis, codified by both Glasgow Diagnostic Statements [11] and Minnesota codes [12]. Correspondences between CODE classes, Glasgow Diagnostic Statements and Minnesota codes were mapped.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text