Association for Surgical EducationFaculty and resident opinions regarding the role of morbidity and mortality conference
Section snippets
Methods
The proposed criterion sample included teaching faculty and surgical residents. Based on six multiinstitutional focus groups from a single geographic area, composed of either faculty or residents exclusively, important issues regarding attitudes toward the M&M conference were identified. The six focus groups were composed of four to eight respondents from several institutions in a single city. Respondents were informally interviewed to determine issues in beliefs, behavior, and attitudes
Results
The combined response rate of the survey was 567 of 1100 (52%). Faculty response rate was 501 of 600 (83%), and resident response was 166 of 500 (33%). Respondents offered overwhelmingly consistent logistics of the M&M conference across institutions. The vast majority of programs, 630 of 667 (95%), hold the M&M conference as a weekly mandatory conference at which residents present cases under the moderation of a faculty member.
Table Ishows the respondent characteristics comparatively for both
Comments
Results of this survey reinforce the widely held view that the M&M conference is fulfilling its role as one of our most important and powerful educational tools. The excellent overall (53%) and faculty (83%) response implicitly suggests its value to educators. In both faculty and resident groups, attitudes were generally positive regardless of academic rank or level of training. The striking similarities of responses in both groups suggest concern for issues, as well as positive aspects of the
References (11)
Joint Session of Committee on Standards
Bull Am Coll Surg
(1917)- Flexner A. Medical Education in the United States and Canada....
- Essentials and information items. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Graduate Medical Education...
Mortality of Surgical Operations in Upper Lakes States Compared with Other Regions
(1877)Some Causes of Excessive Mortality After Surgical Operations
(1884)
Cited by (122)
A toolkit for individualizing interventions to mitigate second-victim syndrome in a diverse surgery community
2024, Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic DisordersGoals of the Morbidity and Mortality meeting in acute care: A scoping review
2024, Australian Critical CareBest Practices for Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Morbidity and Mortality Conferences
2023, JACC: Cardiovascular InterventionsA Sisyphean Task for Residents: Preparing Literature Reviews About Adverse Events Presented at Morbidity and Mortality Conferences
2022, Journal of Surgical EducationA Survey of the Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Conference in the United States and Canada: A Dying Tradition or the Key to Modern Quality Improvement?
2021, Journal of Surgical EducationCitation Excerpt :Almost 80% of responders considered the conference very educational and reported they would attend the conference even if not mandatory. Another national survey in 1999 of 501 faculty members and 166 residents suggested the top 3 goals of the M&M conference were education (faculty: 47%; residents: 43%), to reduce error (faculty: 18%; residents: 31%), and quality assurance (faculty: 14%; residents: 8%).16 Improvement of patient care was ranked fifth by faculty members and sixth by residents.