Original article
Evaluation of the mos SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch Item scale

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90215-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Indexes developed to measure physical functioning as an essential component of general health status are often based on sets of hierarchically-structured items intended to represent a broad underlying concept. Rasch Item Response Theory (IRT) provides a methodology to examine the hierarchical structure, unidimensionality, and reproducibility of item positions (calibrations) along a scale. Data gathered on the 10-item Physical Functioning Scale (PF-10) from a large sample of Medical Outcomes Study patients (N = 3445) were used to examine the hierarchical order, unidimensionality, and reproducibility of item calibrations. Rasch-IRT analyses generated an empirical item hierarchy, confirmed the unidimensionality of the PF-10 for most patients, and established the reproducibility of item calibrations across patient populations and repeated tests. These findings support the content validity of the PF-10 as a measure of physical functioning and suggest that valid Rasch-IRT summary scores could be generated as an alternative to the current Likert summative scores. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the item scale are essential prerequisites for the development of Rasch-based person measures of physical functioning that can be used across populations and over repeated tests.

References (52)

  • S.M. Hunt et al.

    Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists

    J R Coll Gen Pract

    (1986)
  • L.W. Chambers

    The McMaster Health Index Questionnaire: an update

  • A.L. Stewart et al.

    The MOS ShortForm General Health Survey: reliability and validity in a patient population

    Med Care

    (1988)
  • G.R. Parkerson et al.

    The Duke Health Profile: a 17 item measure of health and dysfunction

    Med Care

    (1990)
  • J.E. Ware et al.

    The MOS 36-item ShortForm Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection

    Med Care

    (1992)
  • F.I. Mahoney et al.

    Fuctional evaluation: the Barthel Index. MD State

    Med J

    (1965)
  • S. Katz et al.

    Progress in development of the Index of ADL

    Gerontologist

    (1970)
  • I.A. Iverson et al.

    The Revised Kenny Self-care Evaluation: a Numerical Measure of Independence in Activities of Daily Living

    (1973)
  • R.F. Harvey et al.

    Functional performance assessment: a program approach

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1981)
  • A.M. Jette

    Functional Status Index: reliability of a chronic disease evaluation instrument

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1980)
  • R.F. Meenan

    The AIMS approach to health status measurement: conceptual background and measurement properties

    J Rheumatol

    (1982)
  • C.A. McHorney et al.

    The validity and relative precision of MOS shortand long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts: results from the Medical Outcomes Study

    Med Care

    (1992)
  • C. McHorney et al.

    The MOS 36-item, Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and re liability across diverse patient groups

    Med Care

    (1994)
  • R.K. Hambleton et al.

    Fundamentals of Item Response Theory

    (1991)
  • J.C. Nunnally

    Psychometric Theory

    (1978)
  • Cited by (259)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text