Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 43, Issue 5, September 1996, Pages 697-705
Social Science & Medicine

Empowering patients: Issues and strategies

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(96)00153-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Over the past few decades perspectives derived from critical social theory and other critical perspectives have infused the discourse on health, illness and healing, and have heightened awareness of the ways in which social and economic inequities experienced by particular groups determine their health. The influence of these paradigms in the health sciences occurs, simultaneously, with other movements in health care services and delivery. There has been major overhauling of health care delivery systems in many western nations with concomitant call for greater public participation and individual responsibility for health and health care (self-care). As these movements have gained momentum, ideas that suggest how people will be enabled both to attain greater social equality and to take increased responsibility for their health have flourished, and patient/consumer empowerment has become a central concept in the discourse on health.

Drawing on research data from multiple sources I begin to interrogate what the notion of empowerment might mean for patients living with a chronic illness, particularly women who have immigrated to Canada; I examine the multiple layers of contexts that organize their experiences of illness. Building on earlier research that explicated the unstated ideologies that underpin the self-care movement, I extend this analysis to examine the conceptual underpinnings of “empowerment”. While not dismissing the idea of “consumer empowerment” I question whether unreflexive use of this notion within the “health care industry” might deflect our attention from the structures that perpetuate social inequities. I conclude by arguing for a perspective that will allow us to address issues pertaining to the notion of empowerment in the lives of patients, generally, as well as those who are marginalized and disadvantaged.

References (42)

  • R.G. Evans

    Health care reform: “The issue from hell”

  • Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors

    New Directions for a Healthy British Columbia

    (1993)
  • Minister of Supply and Services

    Achieving Health For All: A Framework of Health Promotion

    (1986)
  • R. Bhopal et al.

    Health promotion for ethnic minorities: past, present and future

  • Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors
  • P.S. Jones et al.

    Health is empowerment

    Adv. Nurs. Sci.

    (1993)
  • J.M. Anderson et al.

    Ideology in the clinical context, Chronic illness, ethnicity, and the discourse on normalization

    Sociology of Health and Illness: A Journal of Medical Sociology

    (1989)
  • J.M. Anderson

    Homecare management in chronic illness and the self-care movement: an analysis of ideologies and economic processes influencing policy decisions

    Advances in Nursing Science

    (1990)
  • Statistics Canada

    Women in Canada

    (1995)
  • S. McGowan
  • Cited by (148)

    • It's MY health care program: Enhancing patient adherence through psychological ownership

      2019, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Every day, patients must perform engaging activities, such as medication administration, insulin injections, and physical exercise, as well as comply with dietary restrictions (Spanjol et al., 2015). These specificities, and the fact that 95% of day-to-day care is done by patients themselves, make diabetes one of the most complex chronic diseases to manage (Anderson, 1996; Anderson and Funnell, 2010; Russell et al., 2005); indeed, health care professionals have no control over their patients' self-care decisions (Anderson, 1996; Anderson and Funnell, 2010). Traditionally, patients' success in managing their diabetes has been judged in terms of their ability to properly adhere to a prescribed care program (Funnell and Anderson, 2004).

    • Equity in Cancer Care: Strategies for Oncology Nurses

      2017, Nursing Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Interventions focusing on mediating individuals' behaviors, without attention to the social, political, economic and other forces shaping health behavior, can lead to victim-blaming, oppression and inequities. This is particularly apparent in those who experience marginalizing conditions within society (eg. discrimination due to gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status).64–67 A brief review of research, systematic reviews, and expert roundtables on enacted and recommended health equity strategies from a variety of settings and systems at local, national, and international levels revealed a common set of themes.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text