Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Obesity and Treatment Meanings in Bariatric Surgery Candidates: A Qualitative Study

  • Allied Care
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study used a qualitative approach to comprehend how the morbid obese conceptualize and deal with obesity and obesity treatment, with the particular aim of exploring the expectations and beliefs about the exigencies and the impact of bariatric surgery.

Methods

The study population included 30 morbid obese patients (20 women and 10 men) with a mean age of 39.17 years (SD = 8.81) and a mean body mass index of 47.5 (SD = 8.2) (reviewer #2, comment #9) interviewed individually before surgery using open-ended questions. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and then coded according to grounded analysis methodology.

Results

Three main thematic areas emerged from the data: obesity, eating behavior, and treatment. Obesity is described as a stable and hereditary trait. Although participants recognize that personal eating behavior exacerbates this condition, patients see their eating behavior as difficult to change and control. Food seems to be an ever-present dimension and a coping strategy, and to follow an adequate diet plan is described as a huge sacrifice. Bariatric surgery emerges as the only treatment for obesity, and participants highlight this moment as the beginning of a new life where health professionals have the main role. Bariatric surgery candidates see their eating behavior as out of their control, and to commit to its demands is seen as a big sacrifice. For these patients, surgery is understood as a miracle moment that will change their lives without requiring an active role or their participation.

Conclusion

According to these results, it is necessary to validate them with qualitative and quantitative studies (reviewer #2, comment #3); it is necessary to promote a new awareness of the weight loss process and to empower patients before and after bariatric surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9·1 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377(9765):557–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fried M, Hainer V, Basdevant A, et al. Interdisciplinary european guidelines for surgery for severe (morbid) obesity. Obes Surg. 2007;17(2):260–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Gemert W, Severeijins R, Greve J, et al. Psychological functioning of morbidly obese patients after surgical treatment [Internet]. 1998; Available from: http://www.nature.com/ijo/journal/v22/n5/abs/0800599a.html

  4. Engstrom M, Wiklund M, Olsén M, et al. The meaning of awaiting bariatric surgery due to morbid obesity. Open Nurs J. 2011;5:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Makara-Studzińska M, Zaborska A. Obesity and body image. Psychiatr Pol. 2009;43(1):109–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer S, Chen E, Katterman S, et al. Emotional eating in a morbidly obese bariatric surgery-seeking population. Obes Surg. 2007;17(6):778–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guerdjikova A, West-Smith L, McElroy S, et al. Emotional eating and emotional eating alternatives in subjects undergoing bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2007;17(8):1091–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heatherton T, Baumeister R. Binge eating as escape from self-awareness. Psychol Bull. 1991;110(1):86–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Troop N. Eating disorders as coping estrategies: a critique. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 1998;6:229–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Walfish S, Brown TA. Self-assessed emotional factors contributing to increased weight in presurgical male bariatric patients. Bariatr Nurs Surg Patient Care. 2009;4(1):49–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bocchieri LE, Meana M, Fisher BL. Perceived psychosocial outcomes of gastric bypass surgery: a qualitative study. Obes Surg. 2002;12(6):781–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Petry N, Barry D, Pietrzak R, et al. Overweight and obesity are associated with psychiatric disorders: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Psychosom Med. 2008;70(3):288–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogden J, Clementi C, Aylwin S. The impact of obesity surgery and the paradox of control: a qualitative study. Psychol Heal. 2006;21(2):273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ogden J, Clementi C, Aylwin S, et al. Exploring the impact of obesity surgery on patients’ health status: a quantitative and qualitative study. Obes Surg. 2005;15(2):266–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaly P, Orellana S, Torrella T, et al. Unrealistic weight loss expectations in candidates for bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(1):6–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Glaser BG. Basics of grounded theory analysis: emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Pr; 1992.

  17. Corbin JM, Strauss AC. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2007.

  18. Strauss AC, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. 2nd ed. Thouasnd Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 1990.

  19. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction; 1967.

  20. Richards PL. Handling qualitative data: a practical guide. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd; 2009.

  21. Jeffery RW, Drewnowski A, Epstein LH, et al. Long-term maintenance of weight loss: current status. Health Psychol. 2000;19(1 Suppl):5–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitsantas A. The role of self-regulation strategies and self-efficacy perceptions in successful weight loss maintenance. Psychol Heal. 2000;15(6):811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wadden T, Stunkard A. Handbook of obesity treatment. London: The Guildford Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rydén A, Karlsson J, Persson LO, et al. Obesity-related coping and distress and relationship to treatment preference. Br J Clin Psychol. 2001;40(Pt 2):177–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Epstein LH, Paluch R, Coleman KJ. Differences in salivation to repeated food cues in obese and nonobese women. Psychosom Med. 1996;58(2):160–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Acknowledgement is due to the Foundation for Science and Technology for financial support (SFRH/BD/37069/2007) for the study; to Dra. Aline Fernandes, Dra. Maria Lopes Pereira, and Dr. Maia da Costa, members of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team for the Treatment of Obesity; and to the Hospital of Braga for their collaboration.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ângela da Costa Maia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

da Silva, S.S.P., da Costa Maia, Â. Obesity and Treatment Meanings in Bariatric Surgery Candidates: A Qualitative Study. OBES SURG 22, 1714–1722 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0716-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0716-y

Keywords

Navigation