Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and Improved Patient-centered Outcomes for Chronic Conditions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) has potential for use as a patient-centered measure of the implementation of the Chronic Care Model (CCM), but there is little research on the relationship between the PACIC and important behavioral and quality measures for patients with chronic conditions.

Objective

To examine the relationship between PACIC scores and self-management behaviors, patient rating of their health care, and self-reported quality of life.

Design

Cross-sectional survey with a 61% response rate.

Participants

Included in the survey were 4,108 adults with diabetes, chronic pain, heart failure, asthma, or coronary artery disease in the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care program across 7 regions nationally.

Measurements

The PACIC was the main independent variable. Dependent variables included use of self-management resources, self-management behaviors such as regular exercise, self-reported adherence to medications, patient rating of their health care, and quality of life.

Results

PACIC scores were significantly, positively associated with all measures (odds ratio [ORs] ranging from 1.20 to 2.36) with the exception of self-reported medication adherence.

Conclusions

Use of the PACIC, a practical, patient-level assessment of CCM implementation, could be an important tool for health systems and other stakeholders looking to improve the quality of chronic disease care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glasgow RE, Whitesides H, Nelson CC, King DK. Use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) with diabetes patients. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(11):2655–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA. 2002;288:1909–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract. 1998;112–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonomi AE, Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, Von Korff M. Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(3):791–820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsai AC, Morton SC, Mangione CM, Keeler EB. A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illness. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11(8):478–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, Kerr EA. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–45. Jun 26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glasgow RE, Wagner E, Schaefer J, Mahoney L, Reid , Greene S. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care. 2005;43:436–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McGlynn EA. An evidence-based national quality measurement and reporting system. Med Care. 2003;41:I8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Glasgow RE, Emont S, Miller DC. Assessing delivery of the five ‘As’ for patient-centered counseling. Health Promot Int. 2006;21(3):245–55. Sep.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mosen DM, Schmittdiel J, Hibbard J, Sobel D, Remmers C, Bellows J. Is patient activation associated with outcomes of care for adults with chronic conditions? J Ambul Care Manage. 30(1):21–9.

  12. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney E, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4 Pt 1):1005–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chesney MA, Ickovics J, Chambers DB, Gifford AL, Neidig J, Zwickl B, et al. Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral medications among participants in HIV clinical trials: the AACTG adherence instruments. Patient Care Committee & Adherence Working Group of the Outcomes Committee of the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (AACTG). AIDS Care. 2000;12(3):255–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner JH, Justice AC, Chesney M, Sinclair G, Weissman S, Rodriguez-Barradas M. Patient- and provider-reported adherence: toward a clinically useful approach to measuring antiretroviral adherence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:91–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. CAHPS 2.0 Survey and Reporting Kit. Silver Spring, MD: Publications Clearinghouse; AHRQ; 2002.

  16. WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28(3):551–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Steiner JF, Koepsell TD, Fihn SD, Inui TS. A general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records. Description and validation. Med Care. 1988;26:814–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Steiner JF, Prochazka AV. The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:105–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmittdiel J, Shortell SM, Rundall T, Bodenheimer T, Selby JV. The effect of primary health care orientation on chronic illness care management. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:117–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health. 1992;82(5):703–10. May.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Kaiser Permanente’s Care Management Institute.

Dr. Mosen’s salary is partially funded by the Care Management Institute. Dr. Bellows and Ms. Remmers are employed by the Care Management Institute.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Schmittdiel PhD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM Appendix

Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (DOC 97 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmittdiel, J., Mosen, D.M., Glasgow, R.E. et al. Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and Improved Patient-centered Outcomes for Chronic Conditions. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 77–80 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0452-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0452-5

KEY WORDS

Navigation