Skip to main content
Log in

Can Virtual Streetscape Audits Reliably Replace Physical Streetscape Audits?

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is increasing recognition that the neighborhood-built environment influences health outcomes, such as physical activity behaviors, and technological advancements now provide opportunities to examine the neighborhood streetscape remotely. Accordingly, the aims of this methodological study are to: (1) compare the efficiencies of physically and virtually conducting a streetscape audit within the neighborhood context, and (2) assess the level of agreement between the physical (criterion) and virtual (test) audits. Built environment attributes associated with walking and cycling were audited using the New Zealand Systematic Pedestrian and Cycling Environment Scan (NZ-SPACES) in 48 street segments drawn from four neighborhoods in Auckland, New Zealand. Audits were conducted physically (on-site) and remotely (using Google Street View) in January and February 2010. Time taken to complete the audits, travel mileage, and Internet bandwidth used were also measured. It was quicker to conduct the virtual audits when compared with the physical audits (χ = 115.3 min (virtual), χ = 148.5 min (physical)). In the majority of cases, the physical and virtual audits were within the acceptable levels of agreement (ICC ≥ 0.70) for the variables being assessed. The methodological implication of this study is that Google Street View is a potentially valuable data source for measuring the contextual features of neighborhood streets that likely impact on health outcomes. Overall, Google Street View provided a resource-efficient and reliable alternative to physically auditing the attributes of neighborhood streetscapes associated with walking and cycling. Supplementary data derived from other sources (e.g., Geographical Information Systems) could be used to assess the less reliable streetscape variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frank LD, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Chapman JE, Saelens BE, Bachman W. Many pathways from land use to health: associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. J Am Plan Assoc. 2006; 72(1): 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ewing R, Schmid T, Killingsworth R, Zlot A, Raudenbush S. Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity and morbidity. Am J Health Promot. 2003; 18(1): 47–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Galea S, Vlahov D. Urban health: evidence, challenges, and directions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005; 26: 341–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leslie E, Coffee N, Frank L, Owen N, Bauman A, Hugo G. Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. Health Place. 2007; 13(1): 111–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(9): 1552–1558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, Sallis JF, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Neighborhood SES and walkability are related to physical activity behavior in Belgian adults. Prev Med. 2010; 50 (Supp 1): S74–S79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pikora TJ, Giles-Corti B, Knuiman MW, Bull FC, Jamrozik K, Donovan RJ. Neighborhood environmental factors correlated with walking near home: using SPACES. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(4): 708–718.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pikora TJ, Giles-Corti B, Bull FC, Jamrozik K, Donovan RJ. Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 56(8): 1693–1703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pikora TJ, Bull FC, Jamrozik K, Knuiman M, Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 23: 187–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Badland HM, Schofield GM, Witten K, et al. Understanding the Relationship between Activity and Neighbourhoods (URBAN) Study: research design and methodology. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9: 224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson J, Lindsey G, Liu G. Viewshed characteristics of urban pedestrian trails, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. J Maps. 2008; v2008: 108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Google maps. Street View. 2010. http://www.google.com/intl/en_us/help/maps/streetview/. Accessed on: 5 August 2010.

  13. Google maps. 2010. http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&tab=wl. Accessed on: 5 August 2010.

  14. Google earth. 2010. http://earth.google.com/. Accessed on: 5 August 2010.

  15. Curtis A, Duval-Diop D, Novak K. Identifying spatial patterns of recovery and abandonment in the post-Katrina Holy Cross neighborhood of New Orleans. Cartography Geogr Info Sci. 2010; 37: 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1): 159–174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baumgartner TA, Chung H. Confidence limits for intraclass reliability coefficients. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2001; 5: 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Looney MA. When is the intraclass correlation coefficient misleading? Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2000; 4: 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. IPEN International Physical Activity and the Environment Network. No date. http://www.ipenproject.org/. Accessed on: 11 August 2011.

Download references

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Witten.

Additional information

The larger project (URBAN study) was supported by the Health Research Council of New Zealand (grant number: 07/356). At the time of writing, HMB was supported by a National Heart Foundation of New Zealand Research Fellowship (grant number: 1210) and SO was supported by a University of Auckland Faculty of Science Summer Studentship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badland, H.M., Opit, S., Witten, K. et al. Can Virtual Streetscape Audits Reliably Replace Physical Streetscape Audits?. J Urban Health 87, 1007–1016 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9505-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9505-x

Keywords

Navigation