Abstract
This topic review discusses the evolving clinical challenges associated with the implementation of electronic personal health records (PHR) that are fully integrated with electronic medical records (EMR). The benefits of facilitating patient access to the EMR through web-based, PHR-portals may be substantial; foremost is the potential to enhance the flow of information between patient and healthcare practitioner. The benefits of improved communication and transparency of care are presumed to be a reduction in clinical errors, increased quality of care, better patient-management of disease, and better disease and symptom comprehension. Yet PHR databases allow patients open access to newly-acquired clinical data without the benefit of concurrent expert clinical interpretation, and therefore may create the potential for greater patient distress and uncertainty. With specific attention to neuro-oncology patients, this review focuses on the developing conflicts and consequences associated with the use of a PHR that parallels data acquisition of the EMR in real-time. We conclude with a discussion of recommendations for implementing fully-integrated PHR for neuro-oncology patients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wen PY, Kesari S (2008) Malignant gliomas in adults. N Engl J Med 359:492–507
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996
Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG et al (2009) Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 360:1628–1638
Milton CL (2009) Information sharing: transparency, nursing ethics, and practice implications with electronic medical records. Nurs Sci Q 22:214–219
Pagliari C, Detmer D, Singleton P (2007) Potential of electronic personal health records. BMJ 335:330–333
Fisher B, Bhavnani V, Winfield M (2009) How patients use access to their full health records: a qualitative study of patients in general practice. J R Soc Med 102:539–544
Tang PC, Lee TH (2009) Your doctor’s office or the internet? Two paths to personal health records. N Engl J Med 360:1276–1278
Ralston JD, Martin DP, Anderson ML et al (2009) Group health cooperative’s transformation toward patient-centered access. Med Care Res Rev 66:703–724
Staroselsky M, Volk LA, Tsurikova R et al (2006) Improving electronic health record (EHR) accuracy and increasing compliance with health maintenance clinical guidelines through patient access and input. Int J Med Inform 75:693–700
Winkelman WJ, Leonard KJ, Rossos PG (2005) Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: Employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness. J Am Med Inform Assoc 12:306–314
Halamka JD, Mandl KD, Tang PC (2008) Early experiences with personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 15:1–7
Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C (2004) Patients’ experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 54:38–43
Groll RJ, Leonard KJ, Eakin J, Warde P, Bender J, Jewett MAS (2009) Electronic surveillance of testicular cancer: understanding patient perspectives on access to electronic medical records. J Oncol Pract 5:177–181
Ross SE, Lin CT (2003) The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 10:129–138
Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Spagnolli F et al (2008) Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: pitfalls in neurooncology. NeuroOncology 10:361–367
Bromberg JE, van den Bent MJ (2009) Oligodendrogliomas: molecular biology and treatment. Oncologist 14:155–163
Ueki K, Nishikawa R, Nakazato Y et al (2002) Correlation of histology and molecular genetic analysis of 1p, 19q, 10q, TP53, EGFR, CDK4, and CDKN2A in 91 astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors. Clin Cancer Res 8:196–201
Morita T, Akechi T, Ikenaga M et al (2004) Communication about the ending of anticancer treatment and transition to palliative care. Ann Oncol 15:1551–1557
Schofield PE, Butow PN, Thompson JF, Tattersall MH, Beeney LJ, Dunn SM (2003) Psychological responses of patients receiving a diagnosis of cancer. Ann Oncol 14:48–56
Davies E, Higginson IJ (2003) Communication, information and support for adults with malignant cerebral glioma: a systematic literature review. Support Care Cancer 11:21–29
Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PM et al (2005) Communicating with realism and hope: incurable cancer patients’ views on the disclosure of prognosis. J Clin Oncol 23:1278–1288
Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PA et al (2004) Cancer patient preferences for communication of prognosis in the metastatic setting. J Clin Oncol 22:1721–1730
Fujimori M, Uchitomi Y (2009) Preferences of cancer patients regarding communication of bad news: a systematic literature review. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39:201–216
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cahill, J.E., Gilbert, M.R. & Armstrong, T.S. Personal health records as portal to the electronic medical record. J Neurooncol 117, 1–6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1333-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1333-x