Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula?

  • Rapid Communication
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is common practice to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the Schwartz formula (a height creatinine/ratio), although it has its limitations. Cystatin C was found to be a superior marker of GFR. No formula has been validated to estimate GFR from cystatin C in children. Children (aged 1.0–18 years, n=536) with various renal pathologies undergoing nuclear medicine GFR clearance studies (99mTc-DTPA single-injection technique) were tested. Cystatin C was measured with a nephelometric assay. The Schwartz GFR was calculated using enzymatically determined serum creatinine in micromoles per liter using the constant 48 for adolescent males and 38 otherwise. Using multiple stepwise regression analysis on log/log-transformed data, we derived the following relationship between the cystatin C concentration and GFR: log(GFR)=1.962+[1.123*log(1/Cystatin C)]. Using the Bland and Altman analysis to test agreement between the Schwartz formula and gold standard GFR showed considerable bias, with a mean difference of +10.8% and a trend towards overestimation of the GFR by the Schwartz formula with lower GFRs. In contrast, the Bland and Altman analysis applied on the GFR estimate derived from cystatin C showed the mean difference to be negligible at +0.3% and no trend towards overestimation of the GFR with lower GFRs. In the regression analysis of the estimate and the GFR, the Schwartz estimate showed significant deviation from linearity, whereas the cystatin C estimate did not. In conclusion, the data suggest that this novel cystatin C-based GFR estimate shows significantly less bias and serves as a better estimate for GFR in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB, Edelmann CM Jr, Spitzer A (1976) A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics 58:259–263

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz GJ, Brion LP, Spitzer A (1987) The use of plasma creatinine concentration for estimating glomerular filtration rate in infants, children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am 34:571–590

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Seikaly MG, Browne R, Bajaj G, Arant BS Jr (1996) Limitations to body length/serum creatinine ratio as an estimate of glomerular filtration in children. Pediatr Nephrol 10:709–711

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nolte S, Mueller B, Pringsheim W (1991) Serum alpha 1-microglobulin and beta 2-microglobulin for the estimation of fetal glomerular renal function. Pediatr Nephrol 5:573–577

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Filler G, Witt I, Priem F, Ehrich JHH, Jung K (1997) Are cystatin C and beta-2-microglobulin better markers than serum creatinine for prediction of a normal glomerular filtration rate in pediatric subjects? Clin Chem 43:1077–1078

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G (2002) Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 40:221–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bokenkamp A, Domanetzki M, Zinck R, Schumann G, Byrd D, Brodehl J (1998) Cystatin C—a new marker of glomerular filtration rate in children independent of age and height. Pediatrics 101:875–881

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Filler G, Priem F, Lepage N, Sinha P, Vollmer I, Clark H, Keely E, Matzinger M, Akbari A, Althaus H, Jung K (2002) Beta-trace protein, cystatin C, beta(2)-microglobulin, and creatinine compared for detecting impaired glomerular filtration rates in children. Clin Chem 48:729–736

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Russell CD (1993) Optimum sample times for single-injection, multisample renal clearance methods. J Nucl Med 34:1761–1765

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I:307–310

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krouwer, JS, Monti KL (1995) A simple, graphical method to evaluate laboratory assays. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 33:525–527

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dalton RN, Haycock GB (1999). Laboratory investigation. In: Barratt TM, Avner ED, Harmon W (eds) Pediatric nephrology, 4th edn. p 355

  13. Filler G, Priem F, Vollmer I, Gellermann J, Jung K (1999) Diagnostic sensitivity of serum cystatin for impaired glomerular filtration rate. Pediatr Nephrol 13:501–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Finney H, Newman DJ, Gruber W, Merle P, Price CP (1997) Initial evaluation of cystatin C measurement by particle-enhanced immunonephelometry on the Behring nephelometer systems (BNA, BN II). Clin Chem 43:1016–1022

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Erlandsen EJ, Randers E, Kristensen JH (1999) Evaluation of the Dade Behring N Latex cystatin C assay on the Dade Behring Nephelometer II system. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 59:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Randers E, Erlandsen EJ (1999) Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of the renal function—a review. Clin Chem Lab Med 37:389–395

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by a limited educational grant from Dade Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada

    Guido Filler

  2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada

    Nathalie Lepage

Authors
  1. Guido Filler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nathalie Lepage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Filler.

Additional information

This study was supported by a research grant from Dade Behring GmbH, Germany. There is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Filler, G., Lepage, N. Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula?. Pediatr Nephrol 18, 981–985 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-003-1271-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-003-1271-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation