Skip to main content
Log in

Static and dynamic standing balance: test-retest reliability and reference values in 9 to 10 year old children

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Based on the literature, reliability reports and normative data for bilateral stance assessments in elementary schoolchildren are limited. The present study was designed to report test-retest reliability and reference values for postural stability in 9 to 10 years old schoolchildren using the Balance Master system.

Materials and methods

Twenty children participated in the reproducibility study (mean age 10.1±0.7) including test and retest measurement with a one-week interval. The modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance (mCTSIB) quantified children’s static standing balance. The test for the limits of stability (LOS) measured dynamic standing balance. The study sample to determine reference values consisted of 99 children (mean age 9.8±0.5).

Results

The ICCs for inter-item reliability of the four sensory conditions of the mCTSIB showed fair to excellent reliability (ICCs between 0.62 and 0.80). The reproducibility between test and retest was non-significant for the condition ‘firm surface with eyes closed’ (ICC of 0.37), fair to good for the three other sensory conditions (ICCs between 0.59 and 0.68), and excellent for the composite sway velocity (ICC of 0.77). For all LOS parameters, the significant ICCs showed fair to good reproducibility (ICCs between 0.44 and 0.62), with the exception of the non-significant ICC for the composite reaction time. The ICCs for the separate LOS parameters showed fair to good and excellent reliability for nine parameters (ICCs between 0.46 and 0.81), while 11 separate LOS scores did not demonstrate significant ICCs.

Discussion

Analysing reference values, girls performed better on all the composite balance parameters compared to boys, with the exception of reaction time and movement velocity. No differences were found on standing balance scores between 9 and 10 year olds.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Balance Master showed fair to good reliability for most postural parameters in 9 to 10 year olds. The current data on postural control in children aged 9 to 10 years are relevant for research in other domains within the clinical field, like obesitas and developmental coordination disorder or in relation to back pain prevalence at early age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

COP:

Centre of pressure

COG:

Centre of gravity

mCTSIB:

Modified clinical test of sensory interaction

LOS:

Limits of stability

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

References

  1. Atwater SW, Crowe TK, Deitz JC, Richardson PK (1990) Interrater and test-retest reliability of two pediatric balance tests. Phys Ther 70:79–87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker CP, Newstead AH, Mossberg KA, Nicodemus CL (1998) Reliability of static standing balance in nondisabled children. Pediatr Rehabil 2:15–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Birmingham T (2000) Test-retest reliability of lower extremity functional instability measures. Clin J Sport Med 10:264–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brouwer B, Culham EG, Liston RA, Grant T (1998) Normal variability of postural measures: implications for the reliability of relative balance performance outcomes. Scand J Rehabil Med 30:131–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cambier D, Cools A, Danneels L, Witvrouw E (2001) Reference data for 4- and 5-year-old-children on the Balance Master: values and clinical feasibility. Eur J Pediatr 160:317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Emery CA, Cassidy JD, Klassen TP, Rosychuk RJ, Rowe BB (2005) Development of a clinical static and dynamic standing balance measurement tool appropriate for use in adolescents. Phys Ther 85:502–514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Figura F, Cama G, Capranica L, Guidetti L, Pulejo C (1991) Assessment of static balance in children. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 31:235–242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleiss JL (1986) Analysis of data from multiclinic trials. Control Clin Trials 7:267–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gabriel LS, Mu K (2002) Computerized platform posturography for children: test-retest reliability of the sensory test of the VSR system. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 22:101–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hatzitaki V, Zisi V, Kollias I, Kioumourtzoglou E (2002) Perceptual-motor contributions to static and dynamic balance control in children. J Mot Behav 34:161–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lafond D, Corriveau H, Hebert R, Prince F (2004) Intrasession reliability of center of pressure measures of postural steadiness in healthy elderly people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:896–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lebiedowska MK, Syczewska M (2000) Invariant sway properties in children. Gait Posture 12:200–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee HY, Cherng RJ, Lin CH (2004) Development of a virtual reality environment for somatosensory and perceptual stimulation in the balance assessment of children. Comput Biol Med 34:719–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McEvoy MP, Grimmer K (2005) Reliability of upright posture measurements in primary school children. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6:35–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nolan L, Grigorenko A, Thorstensson A (2005) Balance control: sex and age differences in 9- to 16-year-olds. Dev Med Child Neurol 47:449–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pollock AS, Durward BR, Rowe PJ, Paul JP (2000) What is balance? Clin Rehabil 14:402–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Riach C, Starkes J (1994) Velocity of centre of pressure excursions as an indicator of postural control systems in children. Gait Posture 2:167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rival C, Ceyte H, Olivier I (2005) Developmental changes of static standing balance in children. Neurosci Lett 376:133–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmid M, Conforto S, Lopez L, Renzi P, D’Alessio T (2005) The development of postural strategies in children: a factorial design study. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 30:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is part of a broader research project entitled: Sport, Physical Activity and Health, carried out by a consortium of researchers from KULeuven, Ghent University and VUBrussels, funded by the Flemish Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greet Cardon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geldhof, E., Cardon, G., De Bourdeaudhuij, I. et al. Static and dynamic standing balance: test-retest reliability and reference values in 9 to 10 year old children. Eur J Pediatr 165, 779–786 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-006-0173-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-006-0173-5

Keywords

Navigation