Abstract
Aim
Treatment options for persistent diabetic macular edema remain disappointing. ILM peeling and intravitreal triamcinolone have been successfully used in several case series; however, there is no evidence that one of these options is superior for specific groups of patients. The triamcinolone versus ILM peeling in diabetic macular edema study (TIME-study) is designed to investigate the efficacy of these two treatments in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema.
Methods
Patients with persistent diabetic macular edema are randomised to either the control group (no treatment), ppV + ILM peeling, or triamcinolone (4 mg) injection. One hundred thirty-five patients are to be recruited per group and followed-up for one year. The main endpoints are defined as change in visual acuity (VA) at 12 months compared to baseline and the change in retinal thickness after 3 months follow-up. Secondary endpoints include differences in the functional success and anatomical success and the effect of the treatment on the patient’s quality of life. Twelve institutions (28 surgeons) in 3 European countries agreed to contribute to the study.
Results
The design issues and implications of the study are described.
Conclusions
The TIME study is the first randomised prospective clinical trial to investigate the effectiveness of the two treatment methods. The results of this study should enable physicians to improve therapy and to select cases according to the most promising treatment option.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pendergast SD, Hassan TS, Williams GA et al (2000) Vitrectomy for diffuse diabetic macular edema associated with a taut premacular posterior hyaloid. Am J Ophthalmol 130:178–186
Harbour JW, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW Jr, Rubsamen PE (1996) Vitrecxtomy for diabetic macular edema associated with a thickened and taut posterior hyaloid membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 121:405–413
Ikeda T, Sato K, Katano T, Hayashi Y (2000) Improved visual acuity following pars plana vitrectomy for diabetic cystoid macular edema and detached posterior hyaloid. Retina 20:220–222
Micelli Ferrari T, Cardascia N, Durante G, Vetrugno M, Cardia L (1999) Pars plana vitrectomy in diabetic macular edema. Doc Ophthalmol 97:471–474
Haritoglou C, Gass CA, Schaumberger M, Ehrt O, Gandorfer A, Kampik A (2001) Macular changes after peeling of the internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 132:363–368
Jonas JB, Sofker A (2001) Intraocular injection of crystalline cortisone as adjunctive treatment of diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 132:425–427
Martidis A, Duker JS, Greenberg PB et al (2002) Intravitreal triamcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 109:920–927
Ferris FL, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I (1982) New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 94:91–96
Radner W, Obermayer W, Richter-Mueksch S, Willinger U, Velikay-Parel M, Eisenwort B (2002) The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:461–467
Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM et al (1993) The lens opacities classification system III. The longitudinal study of cataract study group. Arch Ophthalmol 111:831–836
Gandorfer A, Messmer EM, Ulbig MW, Kampik A (2000) Resolution of diabetic macular edema after surgical removal of the posterior hyaloid and the inner limiting membrane. Retina 20:126–133
Cohen J (1997) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press, New York
Snapinn SM (1992) Monitoring clinical trials with a conditional probability stopping rule. Stat Med 11:659–672
Rom P, Costello RJ, Connell LT (1994) On closed test procedures for dose-response analysis. Stat Med 13:1583–1596
Radetzky S, Walter P, Fauser S, Koizumi K, Kirchhof B, Joussen AM (2004) Visual outcome of patients with macular edema after pars plana vitrectomy and indocyanine green-assisted peeling of the internal limiting membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242:273–278
Mochizuki Y, Hata Y, Enaida H et al (2006) Evaluating adjunctive surgical procedures during vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema. Retina 26:143–148
Patel JI, Hykin PG, Schadt M, Luong V, Fitzke F, Gregor ZJ (2006) Pars plana vitectomy with an without peeling of the inner limiting membrane for diabetic macular edema. Retina 26:5–13
Antcliff RJ, Spalton DJ, Stanford MR, Graham EM, Ffytche TJ, Marshall J (2001) Intravitreal triamcinolone for uveitic cystoid macular edema: an optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology 108:765–772
Young S, Larkin G, Branley M, Lightman S (2001) Safety and efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone for cystoid macular oedema in uveitis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 29:2–6
Greenberg PB, Martidis A, Rogers AH, Duker JS, Reichel E (2002) Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol 86:247–248
Chieh JJ, Roth DB, Liu M, Blemnont J, Nelson M, Regillo C, Martidis A (2005) Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema. Retina 25:828–834
Larsson J, Zhu M, Sutter F, Gillies MC (2005) Relation between reduction of foveal thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal triamcinolone. Am J Ophthalmol 139:802–806
Massin P, Audren F, Haouchine B et al (2004) Intravitreal tiramcinolone acetonide for diabetic diffuse macular edema: preliminary results of a prospective controlled trial. Ophthalmology 111:218–224
Stifter E, Weghaupt H, Benesch T, Thaler A, Radner W (2005) Discriminative power of reading tests to differentiate visual impairment caused by cataract and age-related macular degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:2111–2119
Acknowledgement
This study is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG Jo 324/6-1 (Emmy Noether Career Development Award), DFG Jo 324/7-1, and DFG Hi 541/3-1). The authors wrote this report on behalf of the TIME Study group. A complete list of participants is given in the Appendix.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Participants
Principal investigators: AM Joussen (Düsseldorf), B Kirchhof (Köln), RD Hilgers (Aachen)
Endpoint Committee: AM Joussen, B Kirchhof, RD Hilgers, KD Lemmen
Biostatisticians and data managers: RD Hilgers, D Bauer
Surgeons (alphabetic order):
Agostini (Freiburg), Bornfeld (Essen), Bunse (Kiel), Binder (Wien), Dahlke (Köln), Foja (Leipzig), Gandorfer (München), Groenewald (Liverpool), Hansen (Freiburg), Heimann (Liverpool), Hoerauf (Lübeck), Jochmann (Leipzig), Joussen (Düsseldorf), Kampik (München), Kirchhof (Köln), Kohen (Leipzig), Lommatzsch (Münster), Meier (Leipzig), Müller (Lübeck), Pauleikhoff (Münster), Pearce (Liverpool), Requadt (Hannover), Roider (Kiel), Stolba (Wien), Ulbig (München), Wiechens (Hannover), Wiedemann (Leipzig), Wong (Liverpool)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joussen, A.M., Weiss, C., Bauer, D. et al. Triamcinolone versus inner-limiting membrane peeling in persistent diabetic macular edema (TIME study): design issues and implications. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245, 1781–1787 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0640-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0640-3