Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pulmonary nodule detection on MDCT images: evaluation of diagnostic performance using thin axial images, maximum intensity projections, and computer-assisted detection

European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic benefits of maximum intensity projections (MIP) and a commercially available computed-assisted detection system (CAD) for the detection of pulmonary nodules on MDCT as compared with standard 1-mm images on lung cancer screening material. Thirty subjects were randomly selected from our database. Three radiologists independently reviewed three types of images: axial 1-mm images, axial MIP slabs, and CAD system detections. Two independent experienced chest radiologists decided which were true-positive nodules. Two hundred eighty-five nodules ≥1 mm were identified as true-positive by consensus of two independent chest radiologists. The detection rates of the three independent observers with 1-mm axial images were 22 ± 4.8%, 30 ± 5.3%, and 47 ± 2.8%; with MIP: 33 ± 5.4%, 39 ± 5.7%, and 45 ± 5.8%; and with CAD: 35 ± 5.6%, 36 ± 5.6%, and 36 ± 5.6%. There was a reading technique effect on the observers’ sensitivity for nodule detection: sensitivities with MIP were higher than with 1-mm images or CAD for all nodules (F-values = 0.046). For nodules ≥3 mm, readers’ sensitivities were higher with 1-mm images or MIP than with CAD (p < 0.0001). CAD was the most and MIP the less time-consuming technique (p < 0.0001). MIP and CAD reduced the number of overlooked small nodules. As MIP is more sensitive and less time consuming than the CAD we used, we recommend viewing MIP and 1-mm images for the detection of pulmonary nodules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF et al (2001) Early lung cancer action project: a summary of the findings on baseline screening. Oncologist 6:147–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sone S, Li F, Yang ZG et al (2000) Characteristics of small lung cancers invisible on conventional chest radiography and detected by population based screening using spiral CT. Br J Radiol 73:137–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H et al (1996) Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology 201:798–802

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sone S, Takashima S, Li F et al (1998) Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet 351:1242–1245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE et al (2005) CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology 235:259–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Naidich DP, Rusinek H, McGuinness G, Leitman B, McCauley DI, Henschke CI (1993) Variables affecting pulmonary nodule detection with computed tomography: evaluation with three-dimensional computer simulation. J Thorac Imaging 8:291–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V, Freund T, Akkol E, Felix R (2003) Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 13:2378–2383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Seltzer SE, Judy PF, Adams DF et al (1995) Spiral CT of the chest: comparison of cine and film-based viewing. Radiology 197:73–78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tillich M, Kammerhuber F, Reittner P, Riepl T, Stoeffler G, Szolar DH (1997) Detection of pulmonary nodules with helical CT: comparison of cine and film-based viewing. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1611–1614

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wormanns D, Ludwig K, Beyer F, Heindel W, Diederich S (2005) Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow-detector CT: effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard-dose and low-dose chest CT. Eur Radiol 15:14–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wormanns D, Beyer F, Diederich S, Ludwig K, Heindel W (2004) Diagnostic performance of a commercially available computer-aided diagnosis system for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules: comparison with single and double reading. Eur Radiol 176:953–958

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gruden JF, Ouanounou S, Tigges S, Norris SD, Klausner TS (2002) Incremental benefit of maximum-intensity-projection images on observer detection of small pulmonary nodules revealed by multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:149–157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diederich S, Lentschig MG, Overbeck TR, Wormanns D, Heindel W (2001) Detection of pulmonary nodules at spiral CT: comparison of maximum intensity projection sliding slabs and single-image reporting. Eur Radiol 11:1345–1350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Coakley FV, Cohen MD, Johnson MS, Gonin R, Hanna MP (1998) Maximum intensity projection images in the detection of simulated pulmonary nodules by spiral CT. Br J Radiol 71:135–140

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eibel R, Turk TR, Kulinna C, Herrmann K, Reiser MF (2001) [Multidetector-row CT of the lungs: Multiplanar reconstructions and maximum intensity projections for the detection of pulmonary nodule]. Rofo 173:815–821

    Google Scholar 

  16. Valencia R, Denecke T, Lehmkuhl L, Fischbach F, Felix R, Knollmann F (2006) Value of axial and coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images in the detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice spiral CT: comparison with axial 1-mm and 5-mm slices. Eur Radiol 16:325–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Armato SG 3rd, Li F, Giger ML, MacMahon H, Sone S, Doi K (2002) Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology 225:685–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Armato SG 3rd, Giger ML, MacMahon H (2001) Automated detection of lung nodules in CT scans: preliminary results. Med Phys 28:1552–1561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown MS, McNitt-Gray MF, Goldin JG, Suh RD, Sayre JW, Aberle DR (2001) Patient-specific models for lung nodule detection and surveillance in CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:1242–1250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gurcan MN, Sahiner B, Petrick N et al (2002) Lung nodule detection on thoracic computed tomography images: preliminary evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system. Med Phys 29:2552–2558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee Y, Hara T, Fujita H, Itoh S, Ishigaki T (2001) Automated detection of pulmonary nodules in helical CT images based on an improved template-matching technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:595–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wormanns D, Fiebich M, Saidi M, Diederich S, Heindel W (2002) Automatic detection of pulmonary nodules at spiral CT: clinical application of a computer-aided diagnosis system. Eur Radiol 12:1052–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rubin GD, Lyo JK, Paik DS et al (2005) Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection. Radiology 234:274–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Awai K, Murao K, Ozawa A et al (2004) Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists’ detection performance. Radiology 230:347–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee IJ, Gamsu G, Czum J, Wu N, Johnson R, Chakrapani S (2005) Lung nodule detection on chest CT: evaluation of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system. Korean J Radiol 6:89–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marten K, Seyfarth T, Auer F et al (2004) Computer-assisted detection of pulmonary nodules: performance evaluation of an expert knowledge-based detection system in consensus reading with experienced and inexperienced chest radiologists. Eur Radiol 14:1930–1938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marten K, Engelke C, Seyfarth T, Grillhosl A, Obenauer S, Rummeny EJ (2005) Computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules: influence of nodule characteristics on detection performance. Clin Radiol 60:196–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Armato SG 3rd, Giger ML, Moran CJ, Blackburn JT, Doi K, MacMahon H (1999) Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules on CT scans. Radiographics 19:1303–1311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Giger ML, Bae KT, MacMahon H (1994) Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images. Invest Radiol 29:459–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ko JP, Betke M (2001) Chest CT: automated nodule detection and assessment of change over time-preliminary experience. Radiology 218:267–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Brown MS, Goldin JG, Suh RD, McNitt-Gray MF, Sayre JW, Aberle DR (2003) Lung micronodules: automated method for detection at thin-section CT—initial experience. Radiology 226:256–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Marten K, Grillhösl A, Seyfarth T, Obenauer S, Rimmeny EJ, Engelke C (2005) Computer-assisted detection of pulmonary nodules: evaluation of diagnostic performance using an expert knowledge-based detection system with variable reconstruction slice thickness settings. Eur Radiol 15:203–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marten K, Engelke C (2007) Computer-aided detection and automated CT volumetry of pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol 17(4):888–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Das M, Mühlenbruch G, Mahnken AH et al (2006) Small pulmonary nodules: effect of two computer-aided detection systems on radiologist performance. Radiology 241(2):564–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yuan R, Vos PM, Cooperberg PL. Compuer-aided detection in screening CT for pulmonary nodules. Am J Roentgenol 186:1280–1287

  36. Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M et al (2002) Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 222:773–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Henschke CI (2005) Computed tomography screening for lung cancer: principles and results. Clin Cancer Res 11:4984s–4987s

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Midthun DE, Swense SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE (2003) Evaluation of nodules detected by screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral computed tomography. Lung Cancer 41(suppl 2):S40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. MacMahonH, Austin JHM, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP, Patz EF, Swensen SJ (2005) Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement of the Fleischner society. Radiology 237:395–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Jankowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jankowski, A., Martinelli, T., Timsit, J.F. et al. Pulmonary nodule detection on MDCT images: evaluation of diagnostic performance using thin axial images, maximum intensity projections, and computer-assisted detection. Eur Radiol 17, 3148–3156 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0727-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0727-6

Keywords

Navigation