Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors associated with being a false positive on the General Health Questionnaire

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) has been used extensively in community and primary care research as an alternative to longer, time-consuming and more expensive assessments of the common mental disorders of depression and anxiety. The sensitivity and specificity of the GHQ compared with longer more detailed assessments is between 70 and 80%. Though satisfactory, this raises the concern about the possibility of bias in relation to longer assessments. We studied socio-demographic factors that were associated with being a false positive on the GHQ in order to investigate any ascertainment bias in relation to more detailed assessments.

Method

A total of 7,357 consecutive patients aged 16 and over, in five general practices in Cardiff, Bristol and Pontypridd, were invited to complete the 12-item GHQ. Of these, 1,154 patients scored 3 or more, our case definition on the GHQ, and completed a computerised version of the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R) together with a short socio-demographic questionnaire.

Results

Of the 1,154 subjects who were cases on the GHQ, 344 (30 %) (95% CI 27%–32%) were false positive and were not cases on the CIS-R. After adjustment for the other variables, including GHQ score, false positive subjects were more likely to be employed [odds ratio (OR) 2.7, 95% CI 1.4–5.3], owner-occupiers (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.4) and to have a close friend or relative to talk to about personal problems (OR 2.2, 95 % CI 1.4–3.5).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that in this study there was an ascertainment bias on the GHQ in relation to the CIS-R. Studies that use the GHQ to study the relationship between socio-economic status and common mental disorder could lead to biased estimates of association compared to studies that use the CIS-R. It is likely that the GHQ will lead to a higher estimate of prevalence than the CIS-R in subjects who are better off financially and who have better social support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Araya RI, Wynn R, Lewis G (1992) A comparison of two self-administered questionnaires in primary care in Chile. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 27:168–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Canino GJ, Bird HR, Shrout PE, Rubio-Stipec M, Bravo M, Martinez R, Sesman M, Guevara LM (1987) The prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders in Puerto Rico. Arch Gen Psychiatry 44(8):727–735

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Furukawa TA, Goldberg DP, Rabe-Hesketh S, et al. (2001) Stratum-specific likelihood ratios of two versions of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med 31:519–529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg D (1986) Use of the General Health Questionnaire in clinical work. BMJ 293:1188–1189 Press

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg DP (1972) The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Maudsley Monograph 21:1 edn, Oxford, Oxford University

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg DP, Williams P (1988) The User’s Guide to the General Health Questionnaire, 1 edn, Windsor, NFER-NELSON

  7. Goldberg DP, Oldehinkel T, Ormel J (1998) Why GHQ threshold varies from one place to another. Psychol Med 28:915–921

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harding TW, De Arango MV, Baltazar J, Climent CE, Ibrahim HHA, Ladrigo-Ignacio L, Srinivasa Murthy R, Wig NN (1980) Mental Disorders in primary health care: a study of their frequency and diagnosis in developing countries. Psychol Med 10:231–241

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jenkins R, Lewis G, Bebbington P, Brugha T, Farrell M, Gill B, et al. (1997) The National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys of Great Britain: Initial findings from the Household Survey. Psychol Med 27:775–790

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, Nelson CB, Hughes M, Eshleman S, et al. (1994) Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSMIII-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Arch Gen Psych 51:8–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis G, Araya R (1995) Is the General Health Questionnaire (12 item) a culturally biased measure of psychiatric disorder? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 30:20–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis G, Pelosi AJ, Araya R, Dunn G (1992) Measuring psychiatric disorder in the community: a standardised assessment for use by lay interviewers. Psychol Med 22:465–486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mari JJ, Williams P (1986) Misclassification by psychiatric screening questionnaires. Br J Psychiatry 158:368–374

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stansfeld SA, Marmot MG (1992) Social class and minor psychiatric disorder in civil servants: a validated screening survey using the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med 22:739–749

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software (6.0) (1999) College Station, Texas, Stata Corporation

  16. Townsend P, Phillimore P, Beattie A (1988) Health and Deprivation Croom Helm, New York

  17. Weich S, Lewis G (1998) Poverty, unemployment and the common mental disorders: a population based cohort study. BMJ 317:115–119

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wittchen HU, Ustun TB, Kessler RC (1999) Diagnosing mental disorders in the community. A difference that matters? Psych Med 29:1021–1027

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, T., Watson, M., Sharp, D. et al. Factors associated with being a false positive on the General Health Questionnaire. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 40, 402–407 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0881-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0881-6

Key words

Navigation