Skip to main content
Log in

Newspaper reporting of the medical literature

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the media are providing information to the public about important medical advances in a timely manner and whether the degree of importance is associated with other aspects of newspaper reporting (presence, extent, and prominence).

DESIGN: The authors explored the amount, extent, prominence, and timeliness of newspaper coverage received byNew England Journal of Medicine andJAMA articles published in 1988, by searching ten leading U.S. newspapers. The journal articles were independently rated based on the public’s need to know the medical information contained in the article. The intraclass reliability coefficient for this need-to-know importance score was 0.77.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 35% of the journal articles received newspaper coverage (276/786). The articles were frequently covered by more than one newspaper [extensive coverage (161/276, 58%)] and often appeared on the front page [prominent coverage (42/276, 15%)]. Articles considered most important to the public (92/786, 12%) received more extensive and prominent coverage than did less important articles (p<0.01). More than three fourths of the newspaper stories appeared within two days of the journal article’s issue date. Stories about the most important articles appeared sooner than did those about the less important articles (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: Articles reported in two prominent medical journals are often viewed as being important to the public, and these articles are receiving newspaper coverage that is extensive, prominent, and timely. This is particularly true for those articles considered most important to the public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Medical journals and the popular media. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilkes MS, Kravitz RL. Medical researchers and the media. Attitudes toward public dissemination of research. JAMA. 1992;268:999–1003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Koren G, Klein N. Bias against negative studies in newspaper reports of medical research. JAMA. 1991;266:1824–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Phillips DP, Kanter EJ, Bednarczyk B, Tastad PL. Importance of the lay press in the transmission of medical knowledge to the scientific community. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1180–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Klaidman S, Beauchamp TL. The Virtuous Journalist. New York: Oxford University Press. 1987:30–57.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klaidman S, Beauchamp TL. Baby Jane Doe in the Media. J Health Polit. Policy Law. 1986;11:271–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lohey MA, Dommy RG, Saal FE. Intraclass correlations: there’s more than meets the eye. Psychol Bull. 1983;93:586–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Winkler JD, Kanouse DE, Brodsley L, Brook RH. Popular press coverage of eight National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Topics. JAMA. 1986;255:1323–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nelkin D. How to doctor the media. New Sci. 1986;112:51–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Relman AS. Reporting the aspirin study. The journal and the media. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:918–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Relman AS. The Ingelfinger rule. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:824–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dickerson K, Min YI, Meiner CL. Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA. 1992;267:374–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dan BB. One-minute medicine. JAMA. 1987;257:2798.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson GT. Media. JAMA. 1987;258:2303–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by an NIH Biomedical Research and Support Grant (#S07RR05487-27).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burns, R.B., Moskowitz, M.A., Osband, M.A. et al. Newspaper reporting of the medical literature. J Gen Intern Med 10, 19–24 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599571

Key words

Navigation