Table 2

Final agreed methodological quality assessment results for all included studies*

AuthorYearQuestion 1Question 2Question 3Question 4Question 5Question 6Question 7Question 8Question 9Question 10Total score†Quality category‡
All-cause
 Antonopoulos32200501111000116Moderate
 Currie24199810010010115Moderate
 Donnan33200010010010115Moderate
 Gottrup34201311010000003Poor
 Gruen35199711110010016Moderate
 Henke36200510010010104Moderate
 Lacroix37200811101110118Good
 Morgan38201010010010115Moderate
Diabetes-related
 Ajayi39200900010010013Poor
 Asumanu40201001111000105Moderate
 Chijioke41201000010010103Poor
 Daultry42201111110000004Moderate
 Hurd43200911111010006Moderate
 Leichter44198200010010002Poor
 Mahe45200611110010016Moderate
 Masson46199211010010004Moderate
 Mohammad Akther47201101111000105Moderate
 Mottini48200300010010002Poor
 Nason49201310010010003Poor
 Ogbera50200610010010003Poor
 Ogbera51200701010010014Moderate
 Otu52201300011010104Moderate
 Sjoberg53200700010010013Poor
 Tait54200711010000003Poor
 Unachukwu55200701111000004Moderate
 Wallymahmed56200511010010004Moderate
 Williams57198510010010003Poor
Pressure ulcer-related
 Alja’afreh58201301100000002Poor
 Allcock59199411110010005Moderate
 Amlung60200111111000005Moderate
 Barczak61199711111000016Moderate
 Barrois62199511011000015Moderate
 Barrois63200811011010117Good
 Bours64199911111100017Good
 Bours65200211111100017Good
 Brito66201311111000016Moderate
 Charlier67200111100010015Moderate
 Clark68199211011010005Moderate
 Cole69200411101010005Moderate
 da Silva Cardoso70201011111000005Moderate
 Dealey71199111010000003Poor
 Dealey72199411111010006Moderate
 Ek73198211010000003Poor
 Gallagher74200811111110018Good
 Galvan-Martinez75201211101110017Good
 Gawron76199411111110018Good
 Gethin77200511111010017Good
 Gosnell78199211111110108Good
 Groeneveld79200411111110018Good
 Gunningberg80200511111110018Good
 Gunningberg81200611111110018Good
 Gunningberg82200811111110018Good
 Gunningberg83201311111000016Moderate
 Hopkins84200011111000005Moderate
 House85201111101000004Moderate
 Inan86201211111010118Good
 Jenkins87201011111000005Moderate
 Lahmann88200611111010017Good
 Langemo89199011101000004Moderate
 Lepisto90200111101000004Moderate
 Meehan91199011111000106Moderate
 Meehan92199411111000106Moderate
 Nyquist93198711111000005Moderate
 O’Brien94199811111000005Moderate
 Pearson95200011111010006Moderate
 Soldevilla96200611011010005Moderate
 Thoroddsen97199901011110016Moderate
 Tubaishat98201111111110018Good
 Tubaishat99201311101110017Good
 Uzun100200711111010118Good
 Vanderwee101200711111100017Good
 Vanderwee102201111111100118Good
 Vangilder4200811111000117Good
 Vangilder103201011111000117Good
 Wann-Hansson104200811111010118Good
 Whittington105200411110000004Moderate
 Young106200211111110018Good
 Zhao107201011111010017Good
Total (n)6565536952174602039426
Total (%)83.383.367.988.566.721.860.0025.650.054.6
  • *Please see online supplementary table S3 for descriptions of each question; score: 1, ‘yes’; 0, ‘no’ or ‘not reported’.

  • †Total score, total agreed study quality score from the methodological assessment performed (total possible score is 10).

  • ‡Quality category, total study quality score was classified as either ‘poor’ (total score=0–3), ‘moderate’ (total score=4–6) or ‘good’ (total score=7–10) study quality score.

  • Author, primary author of included study; Year, year included study was published.