Table 3

Associations between depressive symptoms and observed individual working conditions among 95 directly observed eldercare workers

Model I*Model II†Model III‡Individual deviation from work unit average§Work unit average§
Relative difference (%)95% CIp ValueRelative difference (%)95% CIp ValueRelative difference (%)95% CIp ValueRelative difference (%)95% CIRelative difference (%)95% CI
Resources
 Regulation requirements−14(−25% to −1%)0.031−16(−28% to −1%)0.032−15(−27% to −1%)0.043−19(−34% to −2)−7(−28% to 19%)
Stressors
 Extra work due to barriers (difference per 30 min)−4(−13% to 7%)0.481−2(−12% to 10%)0.764−2(−13% to 9%)0.6892(−12% to 18%)−6(−20% to 10%)
 Sum of qualitatively different barriers−3(−21% to 21%)0.8090(−20% to 24%)0.989−1(−20% to 23%)0.933−4(−32% to 35%)2(−25% to 38%)
Barrier sub-scales
  Locomotion, movement and resident handling−9(−35% to 27%)0.565−10(−36% to 26%)0.531−11(−37% to 25%)0.4886(−30% to 61%)−36(−63% to 11%)
 Information processing1(−16% to 21%)0.8964(−14% to 25%)0.6944(−14% to 25%)0.692−1(−22% to 26%)10(−15% to 44%)
 Equipment use2(−16% to 24%)0.8473(−16% to 26%)0.7604(−14% to 28%)0.6648(−21% to 49%)2(−19% to 30%)
 Interruptions0(−21% to 27%)0.9673(−19% to 31%)0.8251(−20% to 29%)0.909−26(−47% to 3%)45(0% to 109%)
  • *Model I: adjusted for age in splines (<35. 36–50. 50<) and cohabitation.

  • †Model II: adjusted for covariates in model I and further adjusted for job group, shift and work hours.

  • ‡Model III: adjusted for covariates in model II and further adjusted for stressful life events.

  • §Model III: where both work unit average and individual deviation from work unit average is included in the same regression analysis.