Table 2

Age-adjusted logistic regression analysis of association of last meeting place with bSTI diagnosis in recent 12 months, German MSM online survey 2013—model 1

Not diagnosed with HIVOR95% CIDiagnosed with HIVOR95% CI
HIV status4.932.80 to 8.66
Meeting place
 Onlinereference
Social venue-negative1.601.03 to 2.48Social venue-positive0.8630.37 to 2.02
Sex venue-negative1.881.37 to 2.57Sex venue-positive1.521.07 to 2.14
 Private setting-negative0.930.34 to 2.55Private setting-positive1.460.76 to 2.79
 Cruising place-negative1.140.59 to 2.19Cruising place-positive0.450.19 to 1.09
 Smartphone app-negative1.480.94 to 2.34Smartphone app-positive1.070.51 to 2.25
 Other-negative0.730.48 to 1.11Other-positive0.160.05 to 0.52
Age group
 20–29reference
 <20-negative0.620.35 to 1.09<20-positive1.180.12 to 11.81
 30–44-negative1.070.82 to 1.3930–44-positive1.550.90 to 2.68
>44-negative0.500.36 to 0.70>44-positive0.820.47 to 1.44
  • Bold=statistically significant associations (p<0.05).

  • Example of how to read the table: The odds of an MSM diagnosed with HIV who met his last non-steady anal sex partner online having received a bSTI diagnosis in the recent 12 months are 4.93 compared with those of an MSM not diagnosed with HIV. The odds of a man not diagnosed with HIV who met his non-steady anal sex partner in a gay sex venue were 1.88 compared with those of a man meeting his last non-steady anal sex partner online. The odds of a man diagnosed with HIV who met his last non-steady anal sex partner in a gay sex venue were 1.52 compared with those of a man diagnosed with HIV and meeting his last partner online, and 1.52*4.93=7.49 compared with those of a man not diagnosed with HIV meeting his last partner online.

  • bSTI, bacterial sexually transmitted infections; MSM, men having sex with men.