Table 3

Comparison of primary and secondary outcomes in intervention and control clusters

nBaselineFollow-upDifference between baseline and follow-up (95% CI)Intervention effect adjusted for baseline and clustering*
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)
Primary outcomes
Well-being score
 Control5950.4 (8.0)49.0 (8.5)−1.4 (−2.8 to 0.0) 
 Intervention22551.0 (8.3)49.9 (8.3)−1.1 (−1.9 to 0.2)0.5 (3.2 to 4.2)
Days off sick from HR data†
 Control660.9 (2.0)1.0 (1.7)0.1 (−0.4 to 0.6) 
 Intervention2941.2 (3.2)1.6 (3.7)0.4 (−0.1 to 0.9)0.6 (1.4 to 2.6)
Days off sick self-report†
 Control511.2 (3.5)1.3 (3.8)0.1 (−0.8 to 0.9) 
 Intervention1981.0 (3.0)1.3 (3.4)0.3 (−0.3 to 0.9)0.1 (2.2 to 2.4)
Secondary outcomes
GHQ
 Control593.2 (3.4)2.9 (3.7)−0.3 (−1.1 to 0.4)
 Intervention2162.8 (3.5)2.9 (3.5)0.0 (−0.4 to 0.5)0.2 (2.0 to 2.5)
Supervisor relationships
 Control5974 (21)75 (19)0.9 (−5.6 to 7.4)
 Intervention22472 (20)71 (21)−1.5 (−3.8 to 0.9)−3.3 (−14.1 to 7.5)
Supervisor support
 Control5987 (23)86 (21)−0.8 (−8.7 to 7.0)
 Intervention22880 (23)80 (24)−0.1 (−3.1 to 2.8)−3.2 (−19.2 to 12.9)
  • *The difference in well-being score and mean days off sick between intervention and control arms, adjusted for baseline and clustering.

  • †Excluding those off sick for more than 21 days at baseline.

  • GHQ, General Health Questionnaire.