Table 2

The collection and reporting of information about missing participant data in Cochrane and non-Cochrane SRs

Overall (N=202)Cochrane SR (N=98)Non-Cochrane SR (N=104)p Value*
Reported a plan to collect number of participants with missing data68 (33.7%)51 (52%)17 (16.3%)<0.0001
Reported a plan to collect reasons for missing data35 (17.3%)26 (26.5%)9 (8.7%)0.0008
Reported number of participants with missing data
 No149 (73.8%)52 (53.1%)97 (93.3%)<0.0001
 Across comparisons, but not for each comparison14 (7.0%)11 (11.2%)3 (2.9%)0.03
 For each comparison, but not for each study3 (1.5%)2 (2.0%)1 (1.0%)0.61
 For each study but not for each outcome34 (16.8%)31 (31.6%)3 (2.9%)<0.0001
 For each outcome2 (1.0%)2 (2.0%)0 (0%)0.23
Reported on the following participant categories with potentially missing data
 No reporting of any category163 (80.7%)66 (67.4%)97 (93.3%)<0.0001
 Mistakenly randomised6 (3.0%)6 (6.1%)0 (0%)0.01
 Did not receive intervention4 (2.0%)4 (4.1%)0 (0%)0.05
 Withdrew consent12 (6.0%)11 (11.2%)1 (1.0%)0.002
 Crossed over0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
 Dropped out21 (10.4%)16 (16.3%)5 (4.8%)0.007
 Non-adherent7 (3.5%)7 (7.1%)0 (0%)0.006
 Lost contact14 (6.9%)13 (13.3%)1 (1%)<0.0001
 ‘Other reasons’ not otherwise specified6 (3.0%)5 (5.0%)1 (1.0%)0.11
 Other specified reason10 (5.0%)10 (10%)0 (0%)<0.0001
 SR authors reported that included studies did not report on missing data3 (1.5%)3 (3.1%)0 (0%)0.11
Reported on missing data as distinct outcome9 (4.5%)8 (8.2%)1 (1.0%)0.02
Reported information on missing data in
 Cochrane RoB tool (table format)61 (30.2%)59 (60.2%)2 (1.9%)<0.0001
 Cochrane RoB tool (graph format)46 (22.77%)45 (45.92%)1 (1.0%)<0.0001
 GRADE SoF table9 (4.5%)9 (9.2%)0 (0.0%)0.001
 GRADE EP0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
 Table describing characteristics of included studies70 (34.7%)61 (62.2%)9 (8.7%)<0.0001
 Other table9 (4.5%)2 (2.0%)7 (6.7%)0.17
 None of the above102 (50.5%)17 (17.4%)85 (81.7%)<0.0001
  • *p Value for the difference between Cochrane and non-Cochrane SRs.

  • EP, Evidence Profile; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; RoB, Risk of Bias; SoF, Summary of Findings; SR, systematic review.