Table 1

Efficacy of HPV vaccination on all-type cervical abnormalities in HPV-naïve women reported in the literature

StudyStudy designSetting/yearStudy population (stratum of study population included)Outcome measure reportedReported vaccine efficacy, % reduction (95% CI)
ASCUS+Any cervical biopsyCIN2+CIN3+
Munoz et al27Randomised controlled trialMultinational 2001–200616–26 years+several other criteria*Rate ratio17.1 (10 to 23)22 (16 to 30)42.7 (23.7 to 57.3)43† (13.0 to 63.2)
Crowe et al28Nested case–control studyQueensland, Australia 2007–201115–18 years in 2007, presenting for first smear, received all 3 doses of vaccineORNANA60 (44 to 70)‡NA
Gertig et al25Data linkage studyVictoria, Australia 2007–2011≤17 years in 2007, had started cervical screening, received all 3 doses of vaccineHRNANA39 (22 to 52)47 (23 to 64)
Baldur-Felskov et al36Cohort studyDenmark 2006–201214–15 years in 2008 (1993–1994 cohort), had a history of cervical cytologyHR§NA67 (17 to 87)75* 10 to 93)
Mahmud et al37Cohort studyManitoba, Canada 2006–201114–17 years in 2006–2010, had ≥1 Pap smearHR45 (32 to 56)NANANA
Pooled estimate32224947
  • *(1) Participants had 0–4 sex partners during their lifetime; (2) no history of abnormal Pap smear test; (3) no history of genital warts; (4) no genital wart detected at enrolment; (5) received at least one vaccination; (6) were seronegative; HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18 negative, and negative for 10 other HPV types at enrolment; (7) had a negative day 1 Pap smear test and (8) had any follow-up visit.

  • †The reported vaccine effect is on CIN3, not CIN3+. No cases of higher grade of severity are reported.

  • ‡Relative risk calculated from reported data.

  • §Vaccine efficacy on ‘atypia or worse’ of 53% is not included in our pooled estimate, because this classification includes reactive changes.

  • ASCUS, Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV, human papillomavirus; NA, not applicable.