Table 2

Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for associations between socioeconomic positions and poor self-rated oral health (SROH) among 3201 men and women aged 25–50 years in Japan during 2010–2011

Independent variableOR95% CIp Value
Occupations
 Professionals1.00
 Office workers1.05(0.79 to 1.39)0.75
 Blue-collar workers1.44(1.07 to 1.95)0.017
Household income
 Lowest tertile1.72(1.38 to 2.16)<0.0001
 Second tertile1.18(0.94 to 1.48)0.15
 Highest tertile (richest)1.00
Wealth (household financial and other assets)
 Lowest tertile1.93(1.51 to 2.46)<0.0001
 Second tertile1.55(1.20 to 1.99)0.0007
 Highest tertile (richest)1.00
Educational attainment
 High school or less1.98(1.63 to 2.42)<0.0001
 Vocational/junior college1.38(1.14 to 1.68)0.0012
 University or more1.00
Economic situation at home when respondents were 5 years old
 Poor, very poor1.61(1.25 to 2.08)0.0003
 Normal1.07(0.86 to 1.34)0.55
 Well off, very well off1.00
Economic situation at home when respondents were 15 years old
 Poor, very poor1.53(1.20 to 1.95)0.0006
 Normal0.91(0.74 to 1.11)0.33
 Well off, very well off1.00
  • SROH was assessed by the following question. “Overall, how would you rate the health of your teeth and gums?” Potential responses ranged from “(1) excellent, (2) good, (3) fair, (4) not so good to (5) Poor.” In the analysis, the outcome was dichotomised: “(1) excellent and (2) good, (3) Fair” as “Good SROH,” and “(4) not so good and (5) Poor” as “Poor SROH”.