Table 2

Comparison of outcome variables at baseline and follow-up and assessment of the difference at follow-up between the two groups adjusting for the baseline levels

 Controlp Value*Interventionp Value*Adjusted difference or relative risk (RR)p Value
BaselineFollow-upBaselineFollow-up(95% CI)†
Physical activity index (n (%)) (RR)0.30.0021.17 (0.86 to 1.60)0.3
 Level 193 (38.3)89 (36.6)130 (48.9)105 (39.5)
 Level 248 (19.8)36 (14.8)41 (15.4)49 (18.4)
 Level 353 (21.8)65 (26.8)62 (23.3)51 (19.2)
 Level 449 (20.2)53 (21.8)33 (12.4)61 (22.9)
Prudent diet SD score (mean (SD))0.0 (0.9)−0.1 (0.9)0.0520.2 (1.0)0.1 (1.0)0.0050.00 (−0.11 to 0.12)0.9
General self-efficacy (mean (SD))14.9 (1.9)14.2 (1.5)<0.00115.1 (1.7)14.6 (1.5)<0.0010.26 (0.01 to 0.5)0.04
Specific efficacy for healthy eating (mean (SD))14.5 (2.3)14.4 (2.1)0.614.5 (2.3)14.2 (2.3)0.15−0.16 (−0,54 to 0.22)0.4
Specific efficacy for exercising (mean (SD))12.3 (2.9)12.5 (2.9)0.312.3 (2.8)12.4 (2.8)0.7−0.11 (−0.55 to 0.34)0.6
Sense of control: total (mean (SD))27.0 (2.5)25.5 (2.0)<0.000127.6 (2.8)26.0 (2.0)<0.00010.35 (0.05 to 0.65)0.02
  • *For the physical activity index, Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test was used to test for differences between baseline and follow-up in each group. For all other variables a matched-pairs t test was used.

  • †This column gives the adjusted difference at follow-up between intervention and control sites, adjusted for baseline values.